Page 4 of 6

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 6:29 pm
by MissLT
[quote="bambang"]

11. Don’t discriminate homosexuals. All we have to do is to bring them back to the right track.



PEACE[/quote]
Just because they're different than you, they're not on the "right track"?

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 5:25 am
by Bambang
[quote="LennyeTran"][quote="bambang"]

11. Don’t discriminate homosexuals. All we have to do is to bring them back to the right track.



PEACE[/quote]
Just because they're different than you, they're not on the "right track"?[/quote]

They're not different from us. They're just walking on the wrong track.

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:07 am
by MissLT
If you don't think they're different than you, then how can they be walking on the wrong track? Whatever "track" they're walking on should be accepted by you since they're not different from you. How can you say they're walking on the wrong track, for they're not walking on your track yet you don't think they're different? This concept is just wrong on many levels.

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:41 am
by mr_Love
" eeewwwwww........"

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:18 pm
by Bambang
A joke for Rasheed.


Ask : How do you make a gay baby cry?

Answer : Take the pacifier out of his ... a s s.



A joke for Lenny.


Ask : What's the definition of AIDS?

Answer : Anally Injected Death Sentence.




And a joke for me.

A man walks into a bar ... once inside, he realizes it's a gay bar, but he decides, "What the heck, I really want a drink."

So he sits down at the bar, and the gay bartender says to him, "What's the name of your penis?"

The man says, "Look, I'm not into any of that. All I want is a drink."

The gay bartender says, "I'm sorry, but I can't serve you until you tell me the name of your penis."

So the man looks at the man sitting to his left who is sipping on a beer and asks, "Hey bud, what's the name of your penis?"

The gay proudly exclaims, "FORD, because quality is very important, he then ads, "Have you driven a Ford lately?"

"No", said the man.

Then the man turns to the bartender and exclaims, "The name of my penis is SECRET. Now give me my beer."

The bartender begins to pour the man a beer, but with a puzzled look asks, "Why secret?"

The man says, "because it's strong enough for a man but made for a woman!"



Moral of the joke: a penis is made for women.

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:25 pm
by Dixie
You guys should be ashamed of yourselves. You know there's a word for this, it's homophobia.

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 4:53 pm
by MissLT
[quote="Dixie"]You guys should be ashamed of yourselves. You know there's a word for this, it's homophobia.[/quote]
Actually, I pity those who admit they're homophobic, but I'm offended beyond words when they don't admit they are. Those people should not go near me and tell me homosexuals are on the wrong track, ewww, what the heck they're thinking, it's against God's will, blah blah blah, yet they don't have the guts to admit they're prejudiced.

It's sad how most of those homophobic people normally have their prejudice towards race and religions also. They either don't like others because of their skin color or religion or both. If you observe those people, it'll amaze you.

Re:

Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 5:00 pm
by Dixie
[quote="bambang"]
Even animals which have no good brain as human beings never "marry" their same sex. He animals have intercourse with she animals. They never make a single mistake on this. They know exactly that he with she. [i][b][size=150]There is no he with he in their dictionary. [/size][/b][/i] :cry:[/quote]

Where did you get that? As far as I know, animals DO have homosexual behaviours. And, according to Wikipedia:"Homosexual behavior occurs among numerous animals other than humans, particularly among social animals".

And it goes on:

"Homosexual sexual behavior occurs in the animal kingdom, especially in social species, particularly in marine birds and mammals, monkeys, and the great apes. Homosexual behavior has been observed among 1,500 species, and in 500 of those it is well documented.[128] [4]. This discovery constitutes a major argument against those calling into question the biological legitimacy or naturalness of homosexuality, or those regarding it as a meditated social decision. For example, male penguin couples have been documented to mate for life, build nests together, and to use a stone as a surrogate egg in nesting and brooding. In a well-publicized story from 2004, the Central Park Zoo in the United States replaced one male couple's stone with a fertile egg, which the couple then raised as their own offspring.[129]

The genetic basis of animal homosexuality has been studied in the fly Drosophila melanogaster.[130] Here, multiple genes have been identified that can cause homosexual courtship and mating.[79] These genes are thought to control behavior through pheromones as well as altering the structure of the animal's brains.[131][132] These studies have also investigated the influence of environment on the likelihood of flies displaying homosexual behavior.[133][134]

Georgetown University professor Janet Mann has specifically theorized that homosexual behavior, at least in dolphins, is an evolutionary advantage that minimizes intraspecies aggression, especially among males.[135] Studies indicating prenatal homosexuality in certain animal species have had social and political implications surrounding the gay rights debate.[136]"

If you want more: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_animals
and also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_an ... l_behavior

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:49 am
by Bambang
Lennye, I am not homophobic. Just take pity on them. That's all.

Thanks for the link, Dixie. Hope we're not gonna copy the animals' behaviors. The animal do that "thing" for the sake of their generation continuity. But we, human beings, should do the opposite. To have generations, we must marry to the opposite sex. Marriages between people of the same sex never produce generations.

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 12:16 pm
by Dixie
Rasheed wrote:Dixie

I respect your opinion, because I believe that you say the truth (maybe not always).
:shock: What does that mean? What does truth mean to you? How do you know whether I always tell the truth or not? I guess it depends on what you understand by truth (=statements with which you agree).

No I am not going to discuss such a basic thing as homosexuality with you. It's a natural thing, either if you want to believe it or not. I don't want to blame you, but the society you were raised in. Anyway like I said I don't like discussing basic things with somebody that doesn't want to even try to understand. It's a waste of time.

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:00 pm
by MissLT
Dixie wrote:
Rasheed wrote:Dixie

I respect your opinion, because I believe that you say the truth (maybe not always).
:shock: What does that mean? What does truth mean to you? How do you know whether I always tell the truth or not? I guess it depends on what you understand by truth (=statements with which you agree).
:lol: I'm the "poisonous" one, Dixie. Anyone who stands next to me is a saint, so you'd be like God if you were standing next to me. Ain't that the truth? :mrgreen: :mrgreen: Anyway, we see what we wanted to see, and it's the truth to us, isn't that right?

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:05 pm
by MissLT
bambang wrote:Lennye, I am not homophobic. Just take pity on them. That's all.
I don't understand you. You said you're neither homophobic nor you think they're different, yet you take pity on them and think they're on the wrong track. How can you have all that emotions when you see them as indifferent? They're not criminals, drug dealers, or anything like that. They just choose their mates in a different way than you do. If you think they're not different, how could they live a wrong life? If you're not homophobic, why would you take pity on them? What is the crime that they have done to the humanity? Please enlighten me. :?

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:14 pm
by Dixie
LennyeTran wrote: we see what we wanted to see, and it's the truth to us, isn't that right?
That's the point!

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:33 pm
by Bambang
Rasheed wrote: Then this behaviour "Homosexual",
is it a disease or normal situation?
Is it a rule or personal behavior (depend on acceptance of the two persons to do this)?
What's the purpose of marriage?
What's the futuristic results, if this behaviour become common?
We don't need children, right?
We don't need any children. We don't need any generations. Thus, homosexsuality should be supported. Let's gayanize and lesbianize this world so that the population of this world will be decreasing pretty soon. I think this strategy is much more effective than the Chinese government's policy to limit the number of people by imposing a regulation for parents to have only one kid. :lol:

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:42 pm
by Bambang
LennyeTran wrote: :lol: I'm the "poisonous" one, Dixie. Anyone who stands next to me is a saint, so you'd be like God if you were standing next to me. Ain't that the truth? :mrgreen: :mrgreen: Anyway, we see what we wanted to see, and it's the truth to us, isn't that right?
When I stand next to you, you'll realize that I myself am the real poison. I am far more poisonous than you, my dear. My poison is dead poisonous. :mrgreen:

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 2:17 am
by MissLT
bambang wrote:
LennyeTran wrote: :lol: I'm the "poisonous" one, Dixie. Anyone who stands next to me is a saint, so you'd be like God if you were standing next to me. Ain't that the truth? :mrgreen: :mrgreen: Anyway, we see what we wanted to see, and it's the truth to us, isn't that right?
When I stand next to you, you'll realize that I myself am the real poison. I am far more poisonous than you, my dear. My poison is dead poisonous. :mrgreen:
I'm sorry. I wasn't really trying to be funny. I was using my "satire" to speak out Rasheed's hypocrisy. He called people liars and don't know what the truth is while he is the one who wants to believe things based on what he sees. Because he sees that I've corrected him, he denies to see the truth in my words. What Dixie said wasn't new, for it was what I said in page 3. Did he see it? Of course, not. I'm glad Dixie didn't wanna discuss it further with him since it'd be a waste of time anyway. This is the reason why people called her smart. :wink:

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 12:43 pm
by Hardi
Until the self reproduction is guaranteed, homosexuals are sure good for society.. They work as well as others.. Only their consumption habits might be different.. so baby-food companies might complain.

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:09 am
by MissLT
Rasheed wrote: If they confirm the homosexual as a normal behavior, so they should be accept the sex relation between the family's members,
:roll: (mumbling... what a load of ~)

:roll: I hope you didn't get this logic from school. Homosexuals don't sleep with their family members. Being a homosexual and choose the same gender mate has nothing to do with incest. Incest gives you retarded kids; homosexuality doesn't. :roll: :roll: :roll:

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:13 am
by MissLT
Rasheed wrote: So they are scared of this discussion.
Of course, we are scared. Did you even read your logic? It's a bunch of whack similar like keep your legs close during sex or you'll be a slut, don't moan; only sluts do, be sexually available for your husband even when he's already had four wives, pray; only infidels don't pray, etc. :roll: :roll:

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:31 am
by Dixie
Rasheed wrote:
I don't know who refused the truth, that who search for her or who elude of it.
If they confirm the homosexual as a normal behavior, so they should be accept the sex relation between the family's members, Maybe they are, I don't know. then should to confess many illogical things.
So they are scared of this discussion.
It's not a big problem if they use the lie to prove their views.
Some of them use some reports have no scientific bases, they vilified the wikipedia before, but now it's great, and we can trust it and depend on it.
Anyway, the future will uncover the truth, but till this moment they have a half of world's problem, and they are the creators of second half of problems.
It's clear that the sun shined from the east but it'll die in the west.
What a bunch of c***! Have you even attended school? How can you "reason" like that? And what does homosexuality have to do with incest?

EDIT: I just read Lennye's post above. Sorry they sound the same.

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:39 am
by Hardi
Technically can't sex between husband and wife, be also called sex between family members? :roll:

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:27 pm
by Bambang
LennyeTran wrote: ...Incest gives you retarded kids; homosexuality doesn't. :roll: :roll: :roll:
Well then, incest is still better that homosexuality?
I agree as incets gives kids. :lol: :lol: :lol: and the homos will never. :D :D :D

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:31 pm
by Bambang
LennyeTran wrote: ...It's a bunch of whack similar like keep your legs close during sex or you'll be a slut, ...
Ha ha ha... 100X

I can's stop laughing! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:34 pm
by Bambang
Hardi wrote:Technically can't sex between husband and wife, be also called sex between family members? :roll:
Yes, you are dead right. :mrgreen:

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:41 am
by MissLT
bambang wrote:
LennyeTran wrote: ...Incest gives you retarded kids; homosexuality doesn't. :roll: :roll: :roll:
Well then, incest is still better that homosexuality?
I agree as incets gives kids. :lol: :lol: :lol: and the homos will never. :D :D :D
Adopt if you want kids and can't have one. Some straight people don't want kids. That's why we have a lot of orphans. Those kids have done nothing to deserve the neglect. What's the point of reproduction when one doesn't wanna take care of the result? :roll:

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:37 am
by Moody
Let’s analyze Gay Union (physical relation).

It consist of two parts
1- Emotional part that is LOVE which alone without physical part doesn’t fall in the category of Gay relation.
2- Physical part ONLY that defines if the relation is Gay or not. OR you can say that if two men are sexually involved ONLY THEN IT IS GAY REALTION.
So basically this relation is based on SEXUAL NATURE only!

Now lets analyze its MAIN ASPECT that is physical sexual relation.

1- From male satisfaction and sensation point, the best and natural a man get is from women. Question : Is it normal and hygienic or SICK behavior to get it by hitting a s.h.i.t hole??
2- And from the point view of person who is allowing the unnatural intercourse through his s.h.i.t hole. Question : Is in love he force the other to hit his s.h.i.t.? Is it normal or extremely unhygienic insane behavior??

Now the last question does love really demand such unhygienic and UNNATURAL behavior??

Are we so lost that don’t know countless other ways of showing our love and compassion like caring, helping and protecting each other rights etc? Rights doesn’t mean s.h.i.t bashing or adopting insane activities. Insanity is a DESEASE and not the normal course or nature of life. BAD HABITS ARE NOT NATURE, YOU ARE ONLY SO AROGANT NOT WILLING TO LEAVE THEM!!!!!!!!!

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 11:55 am
by Stanley
I don't want to discus the sexual side although it does play an important part.
Friendship is what it is all about. Gay boys are some of the nicest and most helpful you could meet, that is why such a lot of them work in the services industry. Hairdressers, cabin crew, catering, waiters, etc etc.
What is so wrong in having a same sex friend?
What is wrong if they like to cuddle, kiss, and hold hands?
And yes! they should be allowed to make vows to each other.

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 3:52 am
by MissLT
Moody wrote:Let’s analyze Gay Union (physical relation).

It consist of two parts
1- Emotional part that is LOVE which alone without physical part doesn’t fall in the category of Gay relation.
2- Physical part ONLY that defines if the relation is Gay or not. OR you can say that if two men are sexually involved ONLY THEN IT IS GAY REALTION.
So basically this relation is based on SEXUAL NATURE only!

Now lets analyze its MAIN ASPECT that is physical sexual relation.

1- From male satisfaction and sensation point, the best and natural a man get is from women. Question : Is it normal and hygienic or SICK behavior to get it by hitting a s.h.i.t hole??
2- And from the point view of person who is allowing the unnatural intercourse through his s.h.i.t hole. Question : Is in love he force the other to hit his s.h.i.t.? Is it normal or extremely unhygienic insane behavior??

Now the last question does love really demand such unhygienic and UNNATURAL behavior??

Are we so lost that don’t know countless other ways of showing our love and compassion like caring, helping and protecting each other rights etc? Rights doesn’t mean s.h.i.t bashing or adopting insane activities. Insanity is a DESEASE and not the normal course or nature of life. BAD HABITS ARE NOT NATURE, YOU ARE ONLY SO AROGANT NOT WILLING TO LEAVE THEM!!!!!!!!!
I can assure that you know nothing about sex based on your post. Please don't embarrass yourself by saying that you know something about sex. You wouldn't have made those statements if you knew something about it. I would shut my mouth and learn more about sex if I were you. :roll:

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 3:22 pm
by cosmo
It is matter of individuals' choice! but my worry is what will happend to the boys (e.g.me) who looks for another kind of body? I hope there were girls too who would not like have relation with same sex and that hope keep alive my business

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:14 am
by Bambang
LennyeTran wrote:
Moody wrote:Let’s analyze Gay Union (physical relation).

It consist of two parts
1- Emotional part that is LOVE which alone without physical part doesn’t fall in the category of Gay relation.
2- Physical part ONLY that defines if the relation is Gay or not. OR you can say that if two men are sexually involved ONLY THEN IT IS GAY REALTION.
So basically this relation is based on SEXUAL NATURE only!

Now lets analyze its MAIN ASPECT that is physical sexual relation.

1- From male satisfaction and sensation point, the best and natural a man get is from women. Question : Is it normal and hygienic or SICK behavior to get it by hitting a s.h.i.t hole??
2- And from the point view of person who is allowing the unnatural intercourse through his s.h.i.t hole. Question : Is in love he force the other to hit his s.h.i.t.? Is it normal or extremely unhygienic insane behavior??

Now the last question does love really demand such unhygienic and UNNATURAL behavior??

Are we so lost that don’t know countless other ways of showing our love and compassion like caring, helping and protecting each other rights etc? Rights doesn’t mean s.h.i.t bashing or adopting insane activities. Insanity is a DESEASE and not the normal course or nature of life. BAD HABITS ARE NOT NATURE, YOU ARE ONLY SO AROGANT NOT WILLING TO LEAVE THEM!!!!!!!!!
I can assure that you know nothing about sex based on your post. Please don't embarrass yourself by saying that you know something about sex. You wouldn't have made those statements if you knew something about it. I would shut my mouth and learn more about sex if I were you. :roll:
Lenny is the sex expert. Don't argue with her! :wink:

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 8:58 am
by Moody
L O L

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 4:33 am
by MissLT
I'm sorry, there's no such thing as a sex expert in my world; I just didn't doze off in my anatomy and physiology class. Human bodies have always been a curiosity for me.

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 10:42 am
by yomismo
I agree with you

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 5:04 pm
by donis
In the world all country must have some rules which can not change by any reason like freedom of people. Like that topic..Ofcourse can not be.. If people want to this , thats mean they are crazy , but in the population people can not do what they want. If everybody can do what they want now ; i am sure after 10-20 years we could have very very strange generations.

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 10:02 am
by Annaa
I don`t agree with the marriages between people of the same sex,but I don`t judge gays and lesbains.

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 4:51 am
by juan
I think every person has the rhigt to choose , who she or he wants to be with,Its the right that we are born with.
but if the person that tried to induce others. that person is doing what the person is fighting against.
so as somebody said, respect others ideas as yu want them to respect yours, otherwise your goal is meaningful

if you wuant tonow who wrote this mi name is manuel mostly now as tepa or meno from jalisco mexico

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 5:35 pm
by ritapally
i'm disagree marriage between people of the seme sex because i think this is against nature.but i'm not against gay people......

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 6:26 pm
by fatema
Marriage from the same sex should not be allowed

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 7:18 pm
by AdiNNa
I don't agree with marriage between people of the same sex :!!:

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 9:56 am
by Consul
I think it is incompatibility that people of the same sex can live together and love each other=)) :-?

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 2:17 pm
by AdiNNa
^still,it happens ..

Re:

Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 2:13 pm
by Anahita
ronke wrote:Marriage from the same sex should not be allowed, In the first instance is not Godly .This should not be legalise in any nation.

I say this kind of narrow - mindedness is what really going to destroy morals at the end not the marriage between the same sex.

two people decide to live together out of love and respect and it happens that they are from the same sex. so what is the problem here? people should be free to choose their way of life and love. no god or religion is qualified enough to stop humans from expressing their true feelings and hearts.

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 5:37 am
by davidhua
firstly , i wanna say i can not understand marriages between people of the same sex . i do not know it mean what ,maybe it mean nothing ..............

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 6:03 pm
by nessma
i think it is unacceptable concept to human nature & any one practice thise manner it will be irregular {-;

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 1:07 am
by AleSte
There is no way to think that it is normal cause it is NOTTTTT gay people should not exist in all the world cause we have children.I mean that they are grewing up with these examples please think about it that's not nice for a little boy even for a little girl actually I hate all the gay people for the same thing they give a very bad example i am sure that you agree with me please let's fight against these people.
THANKS

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:32 pm
by AleSte
nessma wrote:i think it is unacceptable concept to human nature & any one practice thise manner it will be irregular {-;
yeah bro that's what i think

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 1:11 am
by Anahita
AleSte wrote:There is no way to think that it is normal cause it is NOTTTTT gay people should not exist in all the world cause we have children.I mean that they are grewing up with these examples please think about it that's not nice for a little boy even for a little girl actually I hate all the gay people for the same thing they give a very bad example i am sure that you agree with me please let's fight against these people.
THANKS
whoa, whoa, whoa...hold your breath for a second before destroying all the evils in the world! :lol:

so basically, this is the main point of your logic: "any one who is not like me, doesn't think like me, doesn't live like me, doesn't love the same way I do, should be destroyed and actually it is a MUST. lets kill all the people who are different from majority!! yay!" :roll:

with all due respect, I have to say this: you are the one who scares me the most, you and people who think the same like you do. the darkness in your hearts and souls which doesn't let you to love and respect your own fellow human's rights just because you don't like it. you are scary, really. :shock:

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 7:50 pm
by herione
:prof: in my opinion is big mistake because there are no resul just the

Sexually transmitted disease


let us thinking about the world if all the people doing same thing :oops:

Re:

Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 2:03 am
by thepossibilist
ahmedtaha wrote:of coursre not ,in my own point of view i think the marrige concept is much bigger than just making sex , letus ask why people married? the answer would be :-
firstly : to reserve the humanity this a bilogical answer
secondy : to make sex
may be there is another answers but the logical question will be : what life going to be if every body married from his/her sex??
i totaly agree with you ahmed. it is an immoral act, that should be forbiden in every country. biological answer is enough to go against this act. the question that most of people ask themselves, is whether being a gay is a natural thing! be sure that it isn't. it is simply a behaviour that man aquire by the time, and that he must avoid it. so the problem come from the person that try to make this behaviour.
by the way, all the religions do not accept this kind of marriage. calling this a freedom is a big mess, because a freedom that will ruin the humanity is rather a sin!

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 12:15 pm
by langbam
In my country, people got married with the same sex that is illegal action. But nobody were arrested if they have marriages without registered by local authority. I myself feel slightly uncomfortable with news that showing a bride and groom are all absolute man or women. Because they do different way compare with nature.
If this cases appear commonly on mass media, children like teenager could be affected. I saw several pictures showing fake lesbians and gays. They did it because they faced these ones frequently on internet.
But in other hand, the people with their unnatural "disease" should have their human right. And the needed for perfect life, we should submit a new law that applied for mid_sex people?