Does society have double standards about male/female nudity?
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 6:51 pm
As far as female nudity is concerned, society has double standards.
What do you think?
What do you think?
Discussion for learners and teachers of English
https://www.englishclub.com/esl-forums/
https://www.englishclub.com/esl-forums/viewtopic.php?t=38806
Of course, it's a world of men.TP wrote:As far as female nudity is concerned, society has double standards.
What do you think?
I sure hope so! Who wants to see a bunch of naked blokes? Yuk!TP wrote:As far as female nudity is concerned, society has double standards.
What do you think?
Oh Danyet you're smarter than that! ;)danyet wrote:Oh, that's a dirty lie and you know it! Women are not interested in naked men. To a woman sex is just a weapon!
Who told you it was a lie? Why don't you try to get naked in front of me and see if I'm interested or not? Geeezzz, you men know nothing about women.danyet wrote:Oh, that's a dirty lie and you know it! Women are not interested in naked men. To a woman sex is just a weapon!
You...a very bad girl.LennyeTran wrote:Who told you it was a lie? Why don't you try to get naked in front of me and see if I'm interested or not? Geeezzz, you men know nothing about women.danyet wrote:Oh, that's a dirty lie and you know it! Women are not interested in naked men. To a woman sex is just a weapon!
Because he doesn't like guys I do, however, but I would never say that a feminine body is ugly, on the contrary. Nudity is a natural thing; in part when we put on our clothes every day it's like we are hiding a part of ourselves. No, nudity is not ugly or negative or porn (porn is a different concept, who said that nudity is like porn?).LennyeTran wrote:No, I am not. Nudity is an art. There's nothing pornographic about it at all. Look at the Medieval times/Renaissance arts. It involved a lot of nudity, and it was considered as an art. Human body is a beautiful art, with or without clothes. Therefore, why is it beautiful if a girl is nude, but it's not the same for a guy?
There was a news on yahoo,Dixie wrote: No, nudity is not ugly or negative or porn (porn is a different concept, who said that nudity is like porn?).
Offensive and disgusting? Those who think that just don't know what life is about. Have they never seen a mother breast-feeding her baby? How can that woman say that the picture was offensive for her (I bet she doesn't have any children) or that her husband was uncomfortable with it? (I am sure he was lying). What planet do we live in?LennyeTran wrote: There was a news on yahoo,
News
Some of those don't-have-a-life people got scared to see that picture on a magazine. They called it pornography. Can you believe it? Some Americans just wear their underwears too tight.
danyet wrote:I sure hope so! Who wants to see a bunch of naked blokes? Yuk!TP wrote:As far as female nudity is concerned, society has double standards.
What do you think?
Don't you mean until they have bigger body and longer... legs than yours?Hardi wrote:Naked men are artistic, only so far until they have smaller than mine. Otherwise it's all real uglyness and horrible porn... far away from art!
Those women probably didn't breastfeeding their children, and I think their husbands are gay. Either this or those women have a very conservative and submissive mind. Some men are scared of BF. Not because of the nudity but it's because of the action itself reminds them about childbirth, responsibilities of a Father, family, etc. Therefore, those uptight women were probably afraid that this picture would remind their men about all those things.Dixie wrote:
Offensive and disgusting? Those who think that just don't know what life is about. Have they never seen a mother breast-feeding her baby? How can that woman say that the picture was offensive for her (I bet she doesn't have any children) or that her husband was uncomfortable with it? (I am sure he was lying). What planet do we live in?
Well... I hope "Nudity" can be something pornographic as well. Or, at least, something erotic and even perverse and vicious.LennyeTran wrote:No, I am not. Nudity is an art. There's nothing pornographic about it at all. Look at the Medieval times/Renaissance arts. It involved a lot of nudity, and it was considered as an art. Human body is a beautiful art, with or without clothes. Therefore, why is it beautiful if a girl is nude, but it's not the same for a guy?
8) That's Danyet! Loved your post, by the way .jeffcox wrote:
Look at the guy on this forum with the picture of a man with muscles... isn't he appreciating that man's body?
I knowjeffcox wrote: Thanks, LennyeTran
No insult was intended towards Danyet. I just wanted to question the guys' concepts about what they say and what they show us.
loved it!jeffcox wrote: Leonardo Di'Caprio just isn't!
I think there is no doubt about it that the society will have two standars forever!TP wrote:As far as female nudity is concerned, society has double standards.
What do you think?