Page 1 of 1

all

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:48 am
by azz
"They all didn't have coats."

Can't this sentence have two meanings:
1) None of them had a coat.
2) Not all of them had coats.

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2004 1:36 pm
by Alan
No, it is equivalent to #1 only.
An alternative to #2 with 'all' would be

They didn't ALL have coats.