be likely to - negative and past forms

English grammar questions from ESL learners

Moderator: Alan

be likely to - negative and past forms

New postby haderadi » Sun Nov 15, 2009 11:52 am

If you want to say "perhaps they don't meet today", do you say
- they are likely not to meet today
- they are not likely to meet today
- they are unlikely to meet today
?

And if you want to say "perhaps they met yesterday", do you say
- they are likely to have met yesterday
- they were likely to meet yesterday
?

Thanks
haderadi
Member
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 11:26 am
Status: Learner of English

Re: be likely to - negative and past forms

New postby Alan » Mon Nov 16, 2009 7:15 am

If you want to say "perhaps they don't meet today", do you say
- they are likely not to meet today
- they are not likely to meet today
- they are unlikely to meet today
?


All possible.


And if you want to say "perhaps they met yesterday", do you say
- they are likely to have met yesterday
- they were likely to meet yesterday
?


Only the first.
The second is different in meaning and fails to specify whether the action is considered to have (probably) occurred from a present viewpoint. It states simply that the meeting was considered to be a future possibility at the past time in question.
User avatar
Alan
EC Teacher
EC Teacher
 
Posts: 11450
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 7:56 pm
Location: Japan
Status: Teacher of English

Re: be likely to - negative and past forms

New postby Alan » Wed Nov 18, 2009 6:37 am

Yes, that is so.
User avatar
Alan
EC Teacher
EC Teacher
 
Posts: 11450
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 7:56 pm
Location: Japan
Status: Teacher of English


Return to Grammar Help Desk

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests