A scholar wrote in a very learned British magazine this sentence:
"[The investigator] worked out from the actual area of Tahrir Square and the streets leading to it that on the most generous estimate the demonstration CAN'T [my emphasis] have exceeded 265,000 people."
Why did he use "can't" instead of "couldn't"?
Thank you
Source: [Professor] Hugh Roberts, LONDON REVIEW OF BOOKS (print edition), September 12, 2013, page 5
Can't vs.couldn't
Moderator: Alan
-
- Rising Star
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 10:34 am
- Status: Learner of English
- Alan
- Teacher/Moderator
- Posts: 15204
- Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 7:56 pm
- Status: Teacher of English
- Location: Japan
Re: Can't vs.couldn't
I have no idea. "Couldn't" is strictly required here, although tense concord rules are occasionally ignored, even by well-educated natives.