Hello there!
I would like to ask you to shed light on an issue I have. It has created a discussion among me and my friends over this.
We were going through some quizzes in conditional sentences, and encountered this;
I wouldn't be so unfriendly to Jake if he ____ ignored me in the past.
The answer to this sentence is "hadn't", which I think sounds perfect, but one of my mates think it's wrong; that it's not a correct sentence according to the grammar.
She is basically saying that she would prefer it to be this way instead;
1. I wouldn't have been so unfriendly to Jake if he hadn't ignored me in the past.
2. I wouldn't be so unfriendly to Jake if he didn't ignore me in the past
She is insisting that saying 'ignored' is wrong. She is saying that in the sentence we have would + infinitive (would be) [would + be -- if ... ignored], and that the rules related to 'would' are two. If + past perfect ---needs--- would + have + past participle.
Can you please explain to me what you understand of it? And what the sentences (both the original, and hers) implies?
Thank you in advance!
/Hataw
Grammar help - conditional sentences
Moderator: Alan
-
- Member
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2015 10:22 pm
- Status: Learner of English
- Alan
- Teacher/Moderator
- Posts: 15204
- Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 7:56 pm
- Status: Teacher of English
- Location: Japan
Re: Grammar help - conditional sentences
Your original sentence is perfectly possible.
This type, in which a present result is combined with a past cause, is sometimes known as a hybrid conditional.
This type, in which a present result is combined with a past cause, is sometimes known as a hybrid conditional.