shazzam1452 wrote:I think the parents of the children involved in this case should be on trial, for too many reasons to list! Firstly and foremost explotation. I mean really who in their right mind (as a parent) would allow their children to share a bed with a grown man...it is neglect on their part. Putting the prosecutors etc in the middle doesn't help the case. They are just doing their jobs.
Just my opinion.
Agree with you totally. I mean, what kinda loudsy parents are they? Letting their kids stay at Neverland, letting them sleep in the same bed with a psycho and sueing the guy for sleeping the same bed with their children--what the hell?!!?!?!?!?
My family never allows us to have a sleep-over at my friends' houses. The US is too sick with many sex-maniacs. You never know if your childrent might get raped by a friend's parent in a sleeping-over night. Whatcha gonna do after it's happened? Sue the guy? Too late, your kids already got raped. Overall, trust your friends, but sleep at home.
IBLIEVE THAT HE IS GUILTY BECAUSE EVEN THE JURY BLIEVED SO BUT THE PROBLEM THAT THERE WERE NO ENUOGH EVIDENCE AND THE BOUYS WHO WERE FRIEND OF HIM WERE ALL STARS THEY HAVE POWER HE CANT HURT THEM BECAUSE HE WILL BE IN A BIG TROUBLE :x
leen@rasel wrote:IBLIEVE THAT HE IS GUILTY BECAUSE EVEN THE JURY BLIEVED SO BUT THE PROBLEM THAT THERE WERE NO ENUOGH EVIDENCE AND THE BOUYS WHO WERE FRIEND OF HIM WERE ALL STARS THEY HAVE POWER HE CANT HURT THEM BECAUSE HE WILL BE IN A BIG TROUBLE :x
leen@rasel wrote:IBLIEVE THAT HE IS GUILTY BECAUSE EVEN THE JURY BLIEVED SO BUT THE PROBLEM THAT THERE WERE NO ENUOGH EVIDENCE AND THE BOUYS WHO WERE FRIEND OF HIM WERE ALL STARS THEY HAVE POWER HE CANT HURT THEM BECAUSE HE WILL BE IN A BIG TROUBLE :x
One, don't do capital. It hurts my eyes to read your post. I know you're trying to show that you're angry, but don't you think smileys would do a fine job?
Two, the boys and their mothers are from poverty. At first, they denied they were harrassed, but then they changed their mind. Did you ever ask why they changed their mind? And like you said, not enough evidence. I believe he's sick, but not that sick.
shazzam1452 wrote:I think the parents of the children involved in this case should be on trial, for too many reasons to list! Firstly and foremost explotation. I mean really who in their right mind (as a parent) would allow their children to share a bed with a grown man...it is neglect on their part. Putting the prosecutors etc in the middle doesn't help the case. They are just doing their jobs.
This is the biggest current news.
I think everyone could make mistakes,rather that Michael Jackson is aslo a normal person,he also could do some unbelieve things,even he is famous. He gave us so many happy things and wouderful music and great dance, we all should forgive him! Don't allways catch his mistakes to defeat him untill he is in prison or dead. Think about his past, his contribution to our world,not only music ,entertainment,but he also helped many persons out of charity! In china, if he did many good things or he was orginally a good person ,when he make mistakes ,our will think about all his before! We also should do like this
I support you ,Michail!!
Sigmaboy wrote:This is the biggest current news.
I think everyone could make mistakes,rather that Michael Jackson is aslo a normal person,he also could do some unbelieve things,even he is famous. He gave us so many happy things and wouderful music and great dance, we all should forgive him! Don't allways catch his mistakes to defeat him untill he is in prison or dead. Think about his past, his contribution to our world,not only music ,entertainment,but he also helped many persons out of charity! In china, if he did many good things or he was orginally a good person ,when he make mistakes ,our will think about all his before! We also should do like this
I support you ,Michail!!
I don't know if he's helped other people are not, but I must admit enough is enough. If those families need money that bad, work for it then. Money doesn't grow on trees, and what's so hard to work for food and other expenses in the States? Some people are just too rotten to be slaves of money although it has something to do with their souls.
Someone be the slave of money,evil of money, this is not his or her personal wrong. Our society makes them. There is a logion: although money can't make everything, we can't lack money!
money can buy everything...
that's what we should always remember.. we might say money couldn't buy our dignity, principle. all of them are big lies now..
michael jackson has lots of money.. i guess he's guilty. but it's really hard to prove it since he's a very popular and influencing people...
i just said, i guess...
hedwig14 wrote:money can buy everything...
that's what we should always remember.. we might say money couldn't buy our dignity, principle. all of them are big lies now..
michael jackson has lots of money.. i guess he's guilty. but it's really hard to prove it since he's a very popular and influencing people...
i just said, i guess...
How about the other around? Money can buy everything that it makes people sold their souls to tell lies, to sell their kids in the process of adult's problems.
leen__rasel wrote:IBLIEVE THAT HE IS GUILTY BECAUSE EVEN THE JURY BLIEVED SO BUT THE PROBLEM THAT THERE WERE NO ENUOGH EVIDENCE AND THE BOUYS WHO WERE FRIEND OF HIM WERE ALL STARS THEY HAVE POWER HE CANT HURT THEM BECAUSE HE WILL BE IN A BIG TROUBLE :x
I actually think the same. He's been guilty to me all along...
The whole thing is madness anyway. Quite frankly it is over he was found not guilty so that is that. The crazy thing about the system in the US is that a couple of Jurors have now come and and said that they believe he is guilty but they didn't vote that way. But wait for it they both have book deals.
That is what this whole case was about money.
Lets face it no one knows for sure if he is guilty or innocent. He would be a target for many reasons. His strange lifestyle etc. Unfortunately I think alot of this case was motivated by money.
I can't see it ever happening again. I think Michael will just fade into the background of life now.
Michael Jackson has made his first public appearance since the trial in London a few days ago. Apparently he was swarmed by fans; they still love him.
It is such a shame ; because quite frankly why does he still have fans. I used to love his music; but when was the last time he released a hit. I can't remember.
He is a has been. Simple and true. The media needs to move on to people that are actually doing something; not people that used to do something?
shazzam1452 wrote:Michael Jackson has made his first public appearance since the trial in London a few days ago. Apparently he was swarmed by fans; they still love him.
It is such a shame ; because quite frankly why does he still have fans.
?
At the risk of getting into another religious battle I must put it to you. Perhaps M Jackson still has fans for the same reason that the Catholic church still has fans even after The Inquisition.
shazzam1452 wrote:Michael Jackson has made his first public appearance since the trial in London a few days ago. Apparently he was swarmed by fans; they still love him.
It is such a shame ; because quite frankly why does he still have fans.
?
At the risk of getting into another religious battle I must put it to you. Perhaps M Jackson still has fans for the same reason that the Catholic church still has fans even after The Inquisition.
So are you saying that Michael Jackson is like religion? :?
No. I am saying that many people take the attitude that, "My mind is made up. Don't confuse me with the facts". People are not persuaded by facts but by what they want to believe.
shazzam1452 wrote:Michael Jackson has made his first public appearance since the trial in London a few days ago. Apparently he was swarmed by fans; they still love him.
It is such a shame ; because quite frankly why does he still have fans. I used to love his music; but when was the last time he released a hit. I can't remember.
He is a has been. Simple and true. The media needs to move on to people that are actually doing something; not people that used to do something?
Someone likes him is hard to find. I meant, musical skills, not the other area . Thus, I think just because he doesn't release new albums we should forget him. A talented person is always appreciated through time. In addition, I think he's one of the idols that the old generation have left to admire of-- he reminds them of the old days. Just imagine how stupid it would be if the old generations were fans of the young ones like Hillary Duff, Christina Aguilera .
shazzam1452 wrote:Michael Jackson has made his first public appearance since the trial in London a few days ago. Apparently he was swarmed by fans; they still love him.
It is such a shame ; because quite frankly why does he still have fans. I used to love his music; but when was the last time he released a hit. I can't remember.
He is a has been. Simple and true. The media needs to move on to people that are actually doing something; not people that used to do something?
Someone likes him is hard to find. I meant, musical skills, not the other area . Thus, I think just because he doesn't release new albums we should forget him. A talented person is always appreciated through time. In addition, I think he's one of the idols that the old generation have left to admire of-- he reminds them of the old days. Just imagine how stupid it would be if the old generations were fans of the young ones like Hillary Duff, Christina Aguilera .
The fans that I saw on the television that were swamping him in England weren't older people Lenny they were people ranging from 17-20's from what I saw!
shazzam1452 wrote: The fans that I saw on the television that were swamping him in England weren't older people Lenny they were people ranging from 17-20's from what I saw!
Well, you have to admit his old albums are still way better than most the young ones' albums. Right? So if the old is gold, why turn our backs away from it? 8)
shazzam1452 wrote: The fans that I saw on the television that were swamping him in England weren't older people Lenny they were people ranging from 17-20's from what I saw!
Well, you have to admit his old albums are still way better than most the young ones' albums. Right? So if the old is gold, why turn our backs away from it? 8)
I agree that he is music is great. I must admit I think is old hat though. If he still wants adulation he needs to write a new album and do something. He can't keep sitting back on works he produced decades ago.
shazzam1452 wrote:I agree that he is music is great. I must admit I think is old hat though. If he still wants adulation he needs to write a new album and do something. He can't keep sitting back on works he produced decades ago.
You know what, actually I prefer it this way. He's had a good time, and now it's turn for the young ones to make their moves. I'm okay with him trying to relive his moments, but trying to rebuild it is quite meh to me unless his new album is a promise of best of the best (whatever this means ).
shazzam1452 wrote:I agree that he is music is great. I must admit I think is old hat though. If he still wants adulation he needs to write a new album and do something. He can't keep sitting back on works he produced decades ago.
You know what, actually I prefer it this way. He's had a good time, and now it's turn for the young ones to make their moves. I'm okay with him trying to relive his moments, but trying to rebuild it is quite meh to me unless his new album is a promise of best of the best (whatever this means ).
Funny you should say that because alot of people felt the same way about artists like TINA TURNER and DAVID BOWIE and they did great things when the restarted their careers. I just think if he is going to do something he had better do it really soon. People get sick of has beens quickly. Especially ones with the sort of repututation that he is gaining.
shazzam1452 wrote:Funny you should say that because alot of people felt the same way about artists like TINA TURNER and DAVID BOWIE and they did great things when the restarted their careers. I just think if he is going to do something he had better do it really soon. People get sick of has beens quickly. Especially ones with the sort of repututation that he is gaining.
But on the other hand, with the reputation he's having right now, he might not have as many people who will be curious in his new album. I mean, if he waited for awhile and then popped up the new album, peope would be really curious, "hmmm let's see what this guy is up to? New album? I wonder if it's good?" However, if he started right now, some people would be, "I'm not gonna listen to that children molester's music." A lot of negative effects are still going on. I think if he wanted to rebuild his past moment, he should wait for the tension to cool down (I don't think it'll ever be off since he's titled as a children molester even he won the case). To me, when people are no longer angry, they would transfer their feelings to curiosity to someone they were angry with. Don't you think?
I heard yesterday that Michael Jackson has been living in Bahrain since the end of his trial. I mean what is that about?
The reason why this information has become public knowledge is because the vet that has helped him acquire and medically treat all the animals at 'Neverland' (his estate in America) is reluctantly sueing Michael because he hasn't paid his bill for something like two years.
What is it with this guy? He just hates having to pay his way, doesn't he?
seal wrote:Quiet honestly I don't know what to do think about him. The whole thing is very confusing me. I wonder how the jury will decide.
The case has been going for too long. One of the jurors got kicked out of the team, Jacko is selling his Beatle collection ( I think), etc. http://news.findlaw.com/ap/o/51/05-30-2 ... a7b5c.html
If he's found guilty, he could face up to 20 years in prison. *sigh*.......
as I know, In usa have SO many people s in favor of him and hate him!!! about the case which I hear of many time ...i remember during the period , alway have guy stay out to throw stones at him... i ever so hate it when happening!! i hate him can't face up to the fact....
I am listening to his songs now.
I love his songs.
If this case happened in our country,he would not have that trouble,giving his money to the judge,everything was ok!
Now in China, money is the god!
U have money ,u have all.
If you are rich,u can do everything,including killing your enemy.
The Communism Party is the big one,
what that he says right is right ,and ,what that he says wrong is wrong .
He said our people living happy lives,though many people were very poor ,many people did't have enough money to support their childen's education .
TVs, newspapers,broadcasts are all his slaves now .
U can not say anything which is acctually wrong wrong.
Shazzam wrote:There was a news report (with pictures) here this week that Michael was out shopping in Bahrain (with his son Prince Michael OMG ) dressed as a woman.
I mean honestly! What has happened to this guy
It didn't seem to be unusual to me, to be truthful. He didn't wanna be recognized, but I guess he was lousy at his undercover mask.
He was the King of Pop but he hasn't done anything worthwhile in years. I think he no longer holds that mantel. I love the Thriller album it would probably be close to one of my top 10 albums. I also like some of the dance music he did with the Jackson 5. Ben was a great song too. Very sad!