Dixie wrote:
OK then, if drawing caricatures is insane, can you please tell me the more appropriate adjective to designate the authors of its consequences and those who agree with that? You do not support violence but you justify those acts?
I've seen the caricatures and I didn't find them funny at all, but I didn't go and burned a building on order to protest. If everytime we see something we don't like or don't agree with we go and do criminal acts, the world will be turned to ashes.
I am so sick of this matter already. I don't like to discuss something which I find so basic. It's like trying to convince someone that the earth is round. Please thinka little. Do the effort, it won't cost you much and you will feel more mature and free.
You didn't go and burned a building because you aren't a Muslim. You must know that Mohammed means a lot to all Muslims. He is the soul of everyone. And, well, I have to write again, according to Islamics' rule, no one has right to draw his portrait. So don't you think it's insane to insert those caricutures? If the author knew about this, he intended to disrespect Mohammed and Muslims.
Given that he didn't know it, he was foolish to post them everywhere. Because he doesn't understand anything about Islamic, so who allows him to do that?
The action that 'do what you don't understand', I regard as an infantile one.
You can't burn this world into ashes because you don't like anything. But this problem affects a class of people - Islamics, not any single one. I admit that burning houses or killing people is wrong and not all Islamics do like that. People who are guilty will be punished. I'm still young but it doesn't mean I'm not mature so you don't have to worry about that. After all, the world should learn something from this great lesson. Religions are holy. One, even small, action which profanes any religion will cause such a disaster.