Well I believe in past, when these laws were invented it really was so, but..
=Ahmad= wrote:Islam forbids a woman to get together with a man ( men ) without being accompanied by her relatives. It’s all done to protect them from adultery, molestation, rape, and the like.
In the case above, the woman was sentenced because she had broken this law. AGAIN, She was sentenced NOT because she had been gang raped.
=Ahmad= wrote:I’d like to give you an analogy.
Suppose there is a man/woman stealing some jewelry from a jewelry shop. Then the police come to the location. The police ask him/her to stop it. But s/he in fact points a gun at the police and shoots them. Then the criminal runs away. On his/her run, suddenly a car hits him/her because s/he doesn’t pay attention to the traffic. S/he gets injured and then taken to the hospital. And s/he is finally put in jail due to his/her crime.
Getting hit by a car and injured is the consequence of his/her acts. It’s not the punishment. The punishment is the imprisonment. S/he is imprisoned because s/he has broken the law.
=Ahmad= wrote:Similiarly, getting raped was the consequence of her act to get together with men without being accompanied by her relatives. It was not the punishment. And the punishment was that she was put in jail because she had broken the law.
Thank you very much.
It’s all for their own good. It has nothing to do with limiting their freedom.
sunshine81 wrote:It’s all for their own good. It has nothing to do with limiting their freedom.
It is limiting their freedom! That's for sure!
And I also think that this kind of "rule" is pretending that every men in your country is a criminal and dangerous for a woman, doesn't it??

=Ahmad= wrote:Secondly, sadly the media has blown up this case as if the girl were sentenced because she has been gang raped. It’s absolutely NOT. She was sentenced because she had broken the law for getting together with men without being accompanied by her relatives.
=Ahmad= wrote: It’s all for their own good. It has nothing to do with limiting their freedom.
=Ahmad= wrote:Fourthly, her sentence was doubled because she opposed the law and discredited it and provoked the media to fight against this law that’s actually good for her. It was not because she had been gang raped. And some media managed to discredit Islam and its system.
Oriani wrote:sunshine81 wrote:It’s all for their own good. It has nothing to do with limiting their freedom.
It is limiting their freedom! That's for sure!
And I also think that this kind of "rule" is pretending that every men in your country is a criminal and dangerous for a woman, doesn't it??
I really liked this part of the conversation.. And Lenney, don't worry. Thank God we don't live under those rules, Imagine.. we would have been bad treated all the time If we do something "wrong".....
It is sad the fact that women, my genre, is such an object like that.. God...that is not good at all.. at all.. but well... things are like that. Poor woman. What can we do???
Oriani wrote:But why women and not men????
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests