After Five Years From Now ??
Moderator: EC
- zaman
- Rising Star
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 11:20 am
- Status: Other
- Location: libya
After Five Years From Now ??
what do you think about the news after 5 years from now ?
do you think that , map of the world will be change .
the terrorism will be increase more than now .
is there any a big disaster will be happen.
A scientists will discover many of medicines to the diseases of camelish.
do you think that , map of the world will be change .
the terrorism will be increase more than now .
is there any a big disaster will be happen.
A scientists will discover many of medicines to the diseases of camelish.
- FIVER
- Rising Star
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 7:45 am
- Location: WA, USA
I don't know but the fighting in the middle east... I don't see it stopping anytime soon. As soon as it seems like there's an end around the corner, another battle erupts. As for in the medical category I hope they find a cure for the Bird flu, but I'd most like for someone to find a cure for AIDS.
P.S. English will still be the international language.
P.S. English will still be the international language.
- andes
- Member
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 5:56 am
- Location: Indonesia
-
- Member
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 12:11 pm
- Location: CHINA
why the terrosim incease so many!!
I need a answer that someone give me why the terrorism incease more and more faster.
- Danyet
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 2:29 am
- Status: Teacher of English
- Location: USA
Because I know the truth of the whole story.andes wrote:pardon me danyet, can you tell me why do you always stand and fight for Israel?danyet wrote:I hope you don't exist in five years from now.zaman wrote:i hope after five years from now there will not to be exsiting israel city
You, on the other hand have been lied to by your friends, teachers, media and government. (As have most of the people at EC)
-
- Rising Star
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Switzerland
Well, that's interesting statement of someone who supports the Bush regime, isn't it? But on the other hand, we all have been lied to on certain issues by the politicians of our countries, I guess...danyet wrote: have been lied to by your friends, teachers, media and government. (As have most of the people at EC)
- Danyet
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 2:29 am
- Status: Teacher of English
- Location: USA
There is no clear distinction between good and evil. The guys who hasn't done any bad things in his life only exist in novels, the guys who did bad things in his life also did good things.
For example: Someone says that danyet is the personification of evil, but danyet also does good things, for example he stands up to blaim the ones who offer porn sites here, where other people don't dare to.
Without offer, there is no inquiry. With more inquiry, there will be more offer.
As terrorists don't like Bush, they made that terrorist attack against American people. As Bush reacts in sending more and more soldiers occupying the country (which also contains non terrorist people), the non terrorist people find it very annoying and also become terrorists in order to protest.
For example: Someone says that danyet is the personification of evil, but danyet also does good things, for example he stands up to blaim the ones who offer porn sites here, where other people don't dare to.
In social science I learned an important rule:northernwolf wrote:I need a answer that someone give me why the terrorism incease more and more faster.
Without offer, there is no inquiry. With more inquiry, there will be more offer.
As terrorists don't like Bush, they made that terrorist attack against American people. As Bush reacts in sending more and more soldiers occupying the country (which also contains non terrorist people), the non terrorist people find it very annoying and also become terrorists in order to protest.
-
- Rising Star
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Switzerland
Yes, violence always causes more violence... it's such an illusion to begin a war in Iraq (or Lebanon...) and to think it's for the good of peace and safety in the world. All the people that get hurt or lose family members and friends, they don't care if Bush or other politicians did it because of fighting against terrorism, they just get more angry and they will fight back.
- Danyet
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 2:29 am
- Status: Teacher of English
- Location: USA
Easy for you to say this since you come from a country that was too cowardly to take a stance against the Nazi's during the II World War. While your country sucked up to Hitler, Britain led the rest of the world in a fight against Fascism to save France, Poland and the rest of Europe.Rach wrote:Yes, violence always causes more violence... it's such an illusion to begin a war in Iraq (or Lebanon...) and to think it's for the good of peace and safety in the world. All the people that get hurt or lose family members and friends, they don't care if Bush or other politicians did it because of fighting against terrorism, they just get more angry and they will fight back.
Sir Winston Churchill recognized Hitler as the true threat he was, while most European politicions wanted to appease him. And look what happened!!
It is the same with Bush. Bush recognizes Islamofascism as the threat it truely is while Europeans want to suck up to the Islamic world.
Somehow i don't think that someone from Switzerland has any business criticising matters of war and peace.
- andes
- Member
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 5:56 am
- Location: Indonesia
I wish I don't, danyet. I wish we don't.danyet wrote:It is a sad mistake to think that the truth is unknowable. There is a clear distinction between good and evil. If you can not tell the difference I suspect that it is because you are under the influence of evil.
however, in fact we're all under influence of evil..(though sometime we didn't realize that)
that's why we couldn't stop a war. we just make it become worse and worse.
-
- Rising Star
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Switzerland
You seem to know very little of that period of time. When the USA finally decided to intervene into the second world war (and they evaded this for a long, long time!), it was far too late for what you're bringing up here.Sir Winston Churchill recognized Hitler as the true threat he was, while most European politicions wanted to appease him. And look what happened!!
What could have done a little country like Switzerland with less than 4 Million of inhabitants (at this time) against Hitler, by military fighting? They had their own ways of fighting against them, there were very few people here who "sucked up" to Hitler, believe me. I hear my grandfather almost turning over in his grave...While your country sucked up to Hitler, Britain led the rest of the world in a fight against Fascism to save France, Poland and the rest of Europe.
You're crossing literally some borders here that I don't like at all. So you think because the politicians of your country decided to play the role of some sort of self-proclaimed world police, only you have the right to say your opinion?Somehow i don't think that someone from Switzerland has any business criticising matters of war and peace.
Life would be far easier if this was the truth I guess, yes, but I fear it isn't as simple as that. Life isn't just black and white, nope...There is a clear distinction between good and evil.
- Danyet
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 2:29 am
- Status: Teacher of English
- Location: USA
Rach wrote:You seem to know very little of that period of time. When the USA finally decided to intervene into the second world war (and they evaded this for a long, long time!), it was far too late for what you're bringing up here.Sir Winston Churchill recognized Hitler as the true threat he was, while most European politicions wanted to appease him. And look what happened!!
I did not bring up USA in this....you did! And what does USA have to do with Churchill recognizing Hitler as a world threat while the rest of europe did not?
You would not have to fight Htler if you had have backed Winston Churhill. Hitler never would have come into so much power if Europe had have done something about him in the 1930's. But everyone wanted to ignore Hitler and hoped he would just do away istead of being proactive. And now you are doing the same thing by not backing USA against Islamofascism. It is the gutless cowards in this world who refuse to confront problems who make things even worse.Rach wrote: What could have done a little country like Switzerland with less than 4 Million of inhabitants (at this time) against Hitler, by military fighting? They had their own ways of fighting against them, there were very few people here who "sucked up" to Hitler, believe me. I hear my grandfather almost turning over in his grave...
Yep! Just as I figured. You can't tell good from evil either.Rach wrote:Life would be far easier if this was the truth I guess, yes, but I fear it isn't as simple as that. Life isn't just black and white, nope...There is a clear distinction between good and evil.
Police are needed in every society! Somebody has to to the job. You should be thankful the US is taking charge of this instead of China or North Korea.Rach wrote:You're crossing literally some borders here that I don't like at all. So you think because the politicians of your country decided to play the role of some sort of self-proclaimed world police, only you have the right to say your opinion?Somehow i don't think that someone from Switzerland has any business criticising matters of war and peace.
And since you don't know the difference between good and evil your opinion would not count anyway!
hey danyet, I respect your opinions but you can't fix your opinions as a world thesis.
Good and evil is really not that easy said as you imagine. America is a good country, because it fought against the Nazi regime in the 2nd world war, but it is also a bad country as it fought senseless wars like the Korean one or the Iraq one.
In the real life things are not that clear as black and white. That is what Rach meaned.
Good and bad are just extremes. As you can find bacterias in clear water, you can also find both bad and good things in people.Yep! Just as I figured. You can't tell good from evil either.
Good and evil is really not that easy said as you imagine. America is a good country, because it fought against the Nazi regime in the 2nd world war, but it is also a bad country as it fought senseless wars like the Korean one or the Iraq one.
In the real life things are not that clear as black and white. That is what Rach meaned.
-
- Rising Star
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Switzerland
Nothing, you brought up the whole world war II thing and accused Switzerland and the Europeans of "sucking up" to Hitler, I brought up the USA was waiting a long time until they intervened at last.danyet wrote:I did not bring up USA in this....you did! And what does USA have to do with Churchill recognizing Hitler as a world threat while the rest of europe did not?
You forget about the fact that it was a very, very hard time in the 1930 after the so called "black friday" and the world economic crisis. Hitler brought jobs to the Germans, he really did! That's why his evil motives were sort of "covered" first for a long time, this all happened not only in a few months but evolved slowly in a long period of time. And for the "backing up Churchill" thing... do you know the geocraphical location of Switzerland? There is no English Channel nor the Atlantic ocean between Switzerland and Germany. The Swiss of that time were very brave not to deliver themselves freely as Austria and Italy did, because by doing so they risked a declaration of war. We really should not blame whole countries for what had happend so much time ago.Hitler never would have come into so much power if Europe had have done something about him in the 1930's.
But anyway, you can't compare the second world war to the terrorism of today, those are two completely different matters.
Yes, but in a democratic society the police is the executive of the law! As we are talking about international matters we could say the law is represented by the UN. Did the US politicians follow what the UN was saying about all this? No, they behaved like a military regime totally blinding out the UN suggestions. Now the terrorism spreads and increases in the whole world provoked by the wars the Bush regimes started.Rach wrote:Police are needed in every society! Somebody has to to the job. You should be thankful the US is taking charge of this instead of China or North Korea.
I'll take that as a compliment 8)And since you don't know the difference between good and evil your opinion would not count anyway!
Last edited by Rach on Fri Sep 29, 2006 12:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Danyet
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 2:29 am
- Status: Teacher of English
- Location: USA
The UN is not in a position to keep the peace.
The UN has no teeth. This has been proved many times. Rawanda, for one.
Even if the UN did have teeth it be of no use because it has been taken over by corruption and does the will now of corrupt and stupid politicians such as was shown the other day when the President of Venezuela gave his rediculous speech about Bush being Evil while most of the UN delegates cheered him on.
And if you think that the Korean war was wrong then why is it that South Korea is now free and stable while the in North Korea the people are starving to death? If you are an example of the new Swiss it is too bad we did not let the nazis have you.
We should call you Neville Chamberlain! :) :)
The UN has no teeth. This has been proved many times. Rawanda, for one.
Even if the UN did have teeth it be of no use because it has been taken over by corruption and does the will now of corrupt and stupid politicians such as was shown the other day when the President of Venezuela gave his rediculous speech about Bush being Evil while most of the UN delegates cheered him on.
And if you think that the Korean war was wrong then why is it that South Korea is now free and stable while the in North Korea the people are starving to death? If you are an example of the new Swiss it is too bad we did not let the nazis have you.
We should call you Neville Chamberlain! :) :)
-
- Rising Star
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Switzerland
It seems impossible to discuss political topics with you without getting on a personal level...
The USA did good things in the world as you mentioned Ruwanda (though I don't know the context at all). But they did very bad things, too... if you want to look at them or not.
Well, he intervened as the first one, as far as I remember?We should call you Neville Chamberlain!
The USA did good things in the world as you mentioned Ruwanda (though I don't know the context at all). But they did very bad things, too... if you want to look at them or not.
- Danyet
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 2:29 am
- Status: Teacher of English
- Location: USA
To refresh your memory. Nevile Chaimberlain is the British politician who met with Hitler shortly before Hitler attacked his neighbours. Chaimberlain went back to England and told the people that Hitler was a man that could be reasoned with!!!
Churchill recognized Hitler as a threat back in 1930 while Europe was still in their "peacenik" mode.
And yes I always have to bring things down to a personal level. We change the world as individuals, not collectively.
Churchill recognized Hitler as a threat back in 1930 while Europe was still in their "peacenik" mode.
And yes I always have to bring things down to a personal level. We change the world as individuals, not collectively.