have to

[smiledman]

hi
I have some questions
Are the following answers correct?
1-It was not necessary to walk. (use: We)
We had not to walk.
2-She has a car , hasn`t she?
3- Can you help me , please? (Reported speech )
He asked his friend if he could help him.

[dennismychina]

Hi, I’d say;
1. We didn’t have to walk. / It was not necessary for us to walk.
2. Fine.
3. He/She asked if I could help him/her.
Hope this helps.
Enjoy.

[smiledman]

hi
I know this answer but the answers I provide are true?

[EC]

I know this answer but the answers I provide are true?

Re your answers:

1. not correct. It should be: "We didn't have to walk."

2. correct, but may not be entirely idiomatic. British would more likely say: "She's got a car, hasn't she?" [as in "She has got a car, hasn't she?"] Another (I think American) possibility is: "She has a car, doesn't she?" [as in "She does have a car, doesn't she?"

3. perfectly correct

[smiledman]

Thanks greatly

[kamel]

1-It was not necessary to walk. (use: We)
the meaning here is that we walked in reality ,but after walking we recognized that what we did was not necessary;I think we are dealing with absence of necessity I propose the following: we needn't have walked
I hope I 'll receive a comment.

[mheinjapan]

Just confirming ECs response to #2. In America, we would say "She's got a (sounds more like godduh when a California boy like me says it) car, doesn't she?" Again, this is a colloquial SPEECH pattern. In American formal or technical writing, you might simply ask, Does she have a car? I think you already knew that one though, so sorry to beat a dead horse if that's the case.