EnglishClub ESL Forums

Hi there!
Would this be considered a metaphor?
"Facts in his eyes are over, a relic from the age of the printing press."
There is no "is" but could the comma act as one?

"is" or no "is", this sentence makes no sense. What does "over" mean?

'Over' means facts are done for. They don't exist.

Do you mean they are not important?

The sentence structure itself is ok. The word "is" is not necessary. In fact (if I dare use that word ) it would be wrong.

So without getting into whether facts exist or not, I'll leave you to choose your words...

Facts in his eyes are done for, a relic from the age of the printing press.
Facts in his eyes are unimportant, a relic from the stoneage.

...and a thousand other combinations.

But to answer your first question, I don't see it as a metaphor. Just a statement of "fact"...as someone believes it to be.

Thank you for your help! If the whole sentence is not seen as a metaphor, then would "a relic from the age of the printing press" be a simile?
P.S. the sentence is takes from an extract that I have to analyse :)

It's certainly not a simile (which involves "like" or "as...as"). And I don't see it as a metaphor. I take the words literally, not metaphorically.

On second thoughts, maybe "relic" is attempting to be a metaphor. The whole concept is contentious and I find the sentence bizarre So if you have to analyze it, perhaps the answer needed actually is metaphor.