Today, I read a sentence "The buffet we had last night consisted of several different Thai dishes."
I learned grammar from my teacher in class who said that be done is meaning passive.
The other way to say is that "The buffet is consisted of several different Thai dishes. ".
I thought the word "consisted" is meaning passive but the sentence without "be".
Who can explain the sentence's grammar? thank you.
I'm confused about PAST and PASSIVE
Moderator: EC
-
- Member
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2020 7:14 am
- Status: Learner of English
-
- Member
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2021 7:26 pm
- Status: Teacher of English
Re: I'm confused about PAST and PASSIVE
Here 'consisted of' is used as the second form of the verb to reflect simple past tense where we simply use the second form of the verb. So it is not a passive sentence. It simply means that buffet was made up of several Thai dishes. Hope this helps.
-
- Member
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2019 9:29 am
- Status: Teacher of English
Re: I'm confused about PAST and PASSIVE
This is really a great question, one that could give a retired EFL teacher like myself a bit of a headache. First of all the verb s "consist of' -- a phrasal verb. Secondly, this is not really a passive situation. It is not like "The buffet was prepared by a team of Thai chefs" where the chefs clearly are the doers. There are no doers in your sentence. "Consisted of" only tells you what the buffet contained and nothing about who prepared it. Focus on meaning here. Don't worry too much about grammatical structure.
-
- Member
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2021 1:28 pm
- Status: Teacher of English
Re: I'm confused about PAST and PASSIVE
'The buffet is consisted .......' is not correct. The sentence is active and the verb 'consist' has to agree with the subject (buffet).
Some phrasal verbs could be used here in a passive form. For example 'The buffet was made up of .......'
Some phrasal verbs could be used here in a passive form. For example 'The buffet was made up of .......'