Should pet owners be responsible for their pets' behaviour?

Monthly topics for discussion

Moderator: TalkingPoint

Hardi
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1222
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 7:44 pm
Status: Other
Location: European Union

Postby Hardi » Wed Dec 29, 2004 11:14 am

I believe that in some countries exist such laws. I'm not sure, I don't remember exactly but I believe, that here in estonia one person who not feed own horses was banned owning animals. (brrr... englis is so hard) I don't but almost never my dog to lead. I just have a bazooka. And if my dog ton't kill dangerous beoples who vant sue me, because I don't but my dog to lead, or because my dog barking. Then I kill self those persons before thei can sue me.

Actually I think: Must teach peoples allreadyk in kindregarten, how to act with anymals and owning anymals. There is not needed laws, like that u must keep your dog on leads or muzzled. here in my hometown is this law. I think It's owners responsiblyti. If owner feels tha't he/she can trust his dog, then it's not my business, at least so far when nobody don't atack me. And even when dog atack, then its not always dogs or owners fault. some beoples is just so stupid. Really peoples must learn how to act with dangerous dogs.

User avatar
Shazzam
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1201
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 4:40 am
Location: Australia

Postby Shazzam » Tue Apr 12, 2005 11:55 am

In Australia all dogs have to walked on a lead. I think this is a great idea (we also have to use poop scoops and place their dodoos in bins). Dogs also aren't allowed to roam the streets and have to be microchipped and registered by Councils for ownership reasons. If you walk and play with you dog everyday; they don't miss roaming around.

Dogs get hurt too! So it is as much for their safety as others.

sky888walker
Silver Member
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 8:02 am

A penny from me

Postby sky888walker » Wed Apr 13, 2005 11:14 am

Basic logic...

Can a pet assume any responsibility ??

If the answer yes, then its owner should break up a bottle of sampagne and toast coz obviously he/she will be the most luckiest man/woman on earth.

Unfortunately, the answer is no, so, for sure its owner should assume full responsibility for whatever reason.

Case closed.. lol.. next case, please.

User avatar
Shazzam
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1201
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 4:40 am
Location: Australia

Re: A penny from me

Postby Shazzam » Wed Apr 13, 2005 12:36 pm

sky888walker wrote:Basic logic...

Can a pet assume any responsibility ??

If the answer yes, then its owner should break up a bottle of sampagne and toast coz obviously he/she will be the most luckiest man/woman on earth.

Unfortunately, the answer is no, so, for sure its owner should assume full responsibility for whatever reason.

Case closed.. lol.. next case, please.


Exactly, :lol: they are unpredictable. We are the owners and with ownership comes responsibility! Yahoo;;; well said!!

User avatar
Shazzam
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1201
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 4:40 am
Location: Australia

Re: It depends...

Postby Shazzam » Wed Apr 13, 2005 12:39 pm

simplyblessedwithlove wrote:
Prometheus wrote:In my opinion it depends on the situation. For example, if my dog had attacked and killed Mother Teresa, then I should have been held responsible. But if my dog attacked and killed George Bush Jnr (or Snr for that matter) then George Bush should be held responsible (posthumously, of course) and I should be given a Nobel prize.


I know you're trying to be funny, but personally, I don't think it's ok to say that. I'm not a fan of Bush family; however, it doesn't mean I do feel right to kill him. Killing is killing. It doesn't matter who you've killed. If a person is evilly dangerous, that person should be siezed by the laws.


I think you need to re-read the comments; they were a joke. I don't think this person meant it literally plus I don't think he would personally go and kill anyone. Just a generalisation. :lol: ;)

Guest

Re: It depends...

Postby Guest » Wed Apr 13, 2005 4:26 pm

shazzam1452 wrote:
simplyblessedwithlove wrote:
Prometheus wrote:In my opinion it depends on the situation. For example, if my dog had attacked and killed Mother Teresa, then I should have been held responsible. But if my dog attacked and killed George Bush Jnr (or Snr for that matter) then George Bush should be held responsible (posthumously, of course) and I should be given a Nobel prize.


I know you're trying to be funny, but personally, I don't think it's ok to say that. I'm not a fan of Bush family; however, it doesn't mean I do feel right to kill him. Killing is killing. It doesn't matter who you've killed. If a person is evilly dangerous, that person should be siezed by the laws.


I think you need to re-read the comments; they were a joke. I don't think this person meant it literally plus I don't think he would personally go and kill anyone. Just a generalisation. :lol: ;)

Image Booooooooooooo to you! I said I knew he was trying to be funny. Image Now am I funny or what??? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

sky888walker
Silver Member
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 8:02 am

simplyblessed ???

Postby sky888walker » Thu Apr 14, 2005 11:23 am

Oh, sorry, i dont know that simplyblessed was also trying to be funny...

Can i laugh now... ??

ha ha ha

User avatar
Shazzam
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1201
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 4:40 am
Location: Australia

Should you be responsible for your pets.

Postby Shazzam » Fri May 06, 2005 9:31 am

Arale wrote:
wonki wrote:
So~! if the owners don't want to take responsibility, i want to say this, DO NOT OWN A PET!!!


wonki, how can you ban them from owning pets? There is no rule. Do you have any method then?

_Arale_


In Australia this week three breeds of dogs have been banned in this Country due to increasing numbers of attacks on children over the past several years. Anyone owning these dogs now has to have them neutered to prevent breeding. This will eventually eliminate this breed of dog in Australia.

The were mostly American Pit Bull Terriers.

Coolfish
Silver Member
Posts: 40
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 6:09 am

Postby Coolfish » Wed May 11, 2005 5:58 am

Sure, the owner should be responsible for the pets' behaviour. In most case, the owner likes his pet. Just like his children, should they be responsible for their children's behaviour? Definitely the answer is Yes.

Yan999
Member
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 7:57 am

Postby Yan999 » Thu May 12, 2005 11:04 am

Yes, the owner should be responsible for their pets, especially dangerous pets, i think government should have some policy for it, such as : can not keep dangerous pets, should be in trace for all of the pets.
i dont like to keep pets for a long time.

User avatar
Shazzam
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1201
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 4:40 am
Location: Australia

Postby Shazzam » Wed Jun 29, 2005 12:36 pm

Yan999 wrote:i dont like to keep pets for a long time.


Good grief what do you do with them when you are finished with them? :P

User avatar
MissLT
Ethereal Member
Posts: 3939
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
Status: Other

Re: Should you be responsible for your pets.

Postby MissLT » Wed Jun 29, 2005 4:34 pm

shazzam1452 wrote: The were mostly American Pit Bull Terriers.

Some just attacked 12 years-old little boy and killed him when he was locked in the basement with that stupid dog for his punishment. The story is really sad. I'll find a link to share with you when I'm back. Kinda busy now. Anyway, the bottom line of that story is Pitt Bulls will be watched. And that mother, gosh, some mothers are monsters. She didn't even grip over her son's death. I think she should be punished instead of that dog.

User avatar
MissLT
Ethereal Member
Posts: 3939
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
Status: Other

Postby MissLT » Sat Jul 02, 2005 2:07 am


Vale
New Member
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:16 pm
Status: English Learner

Re: Should pet owners be responsible for their pets' behaviour?

Postby Vale » Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:50 pm

The biggest problem with the behavior of some pets is definitely the owner, not the pet. Every dog can become dangerous in bad hands, in my opinion animal cruelty is a reflection of human cruelty! All over the world there are crimes and things like that committed by people, but we don`t kill them, why should we do that with animals?

User avatar
Krisi
Ethereal Member
Posts: 3792
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 9:48 am
Status: English Learner
Location: house

Re: Should pet owners be responsible for their pets' behavio

Postby Krisi » Sun Aug 01, 2010 5:31 am

I think, it is necessary that dangerous dogs be lead and muzzled in public places. The owners will always be responsible for the behaviour of their pets.

User avatar
MissLT
Ethereal Member
Posts: 3939
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
Status: Other

Re: Should pet owners be responsible for their pets' behavio

Postby MissLT » Sat Aug 07, 2010 9:05 am

They say there is no irresponsible pet, only irresponsible owner.

User avatar
emresenoglu
Member
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 5:34 pm
Status: English Learner

Re: Should pet owners be responsible for their pets' behavio

Postby emresenoglu » Sat Nov 20, 2010 11:48 am

Pets especially dogs must be walk with their owners and never be free, if they live in the city. Dog owners can free their dogs in their garden.

User avatar
sweethuman
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1144
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 7:18 am
Status: Other
Contact:

Re: Should pet owners be responsible for their pets' behavio

Postby sweethuman » Tue Jun 07, 2011 10:16 am

I dont think so that they owners should be held responsible, because they are animals and they dont have brain/wisdom, They can do anything at any moment.


Return to “Talking Point Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests