More nuclear power stations?

Monthly topics for discussion

Moderator: TalkingPoint

Post Reply
Adhir Garg
Member
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 7:04 am
Status: Other
Location: India

Post by Adhir Garg »

Hello ddai...(I would always forget the name and of course extension) :)

You are right in saying that excess of anything is bad for health, but little or less knowledge would make the things worse. :idea: I hope You agree with me in this respect.

Controlling ourself is a different topic. Why does not anybody raise this topic !! The topic can be "Should we control ourself to prevent Population Explosion and How" :?:

Enjoy
Life is very short (max 100 years normally), so enjoy every moment of it

Adhir
User avatar
Arale
Rising Star
Rising Star
Posts: 377
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 7:05 am
Status: Learner of English
Location: Vietnam

Post by Arale »

Nuclear power is a hot problem in some countries now such as Iran or North Korea .America always oppose these programs because they are scared that Iran or North Korean will use nuclear power in war .I think building nuclear station for electricity is good ,for electricity not for war !If America does not interfer in others why does they frighten ? :roll:

_Arale_
User avatar
Guest

Post by Guest »

Nuclear power plants are mostly for electricity and this topic is about whether we should build more plants in order to generate more electricity. I don't know. It depends on if a city, province, or country has enough electric power to serve its people.
SCAR
Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:04 am
Status: Learner of English

Re: More nuclear power stations?

Post by SCAR »

I AGREE WITH BUILDING MORE NUCLEAR POWER STATIONS BUT I THINK IT SHOULDN'T BE INSTALLED IN UNDEVELOPPED COUNTRIES BECAUSE I THINK THEY CAN'T KEEP IT SAFE.I THINK THERE AREN'T MANY COUNTRIES WHICH CAN KEEP IT SAFE BECAUSE IT IS VERY DIFFICULT TO CONTROL AND IT COULD HAPPEN THE SAME THING AS CHERNOBYLIN 1986.
SCAR
Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:04 am
Status: Learner of English

Re: More nuclear power stations?

Post by SCAR »

MY TEACHER THINKS WE SHOULD INVEST MORE MONEY INTO RESEARCH SO AS TO DEVELOP SUSTAINABLE ENERGY. NUCLEAR PLANTS MAY NOT CONTRIBUTE TO GLOBAL WARMING BUT THEY DO PRODUCE NUCLEAR WASTES.
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
wllsp
Rising Star
Rising Star
Posts: 119
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 7:54 am
Location: Russia, Saint-Petersburg

Re: More nuclear power stations?

Post by wllsp »

Briefly, if a country has required level of technology to build nuclear power stations and to operate them safely my answer is yes. Other countries should use other technologies to generate electricity. It seems that inevitably in a few decades there will be necessity to generate most of energy without burning fossil fuel, so countries should gradually improve other technologies.
User avatar
sweethuman
Top Contributor
Top Contributor
Posts: 559
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 7:18 am
Status: Other

Re: More nuclear power stations?

Post by sweethuman »

It is good if they are really used for electricity generation however if they are used on the other aspect it is really harmful for the whole world
leeOxo
Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 5:08 pm
Status: Learner of English

Re: More nuclear power stations?

Post by leeOxo »

y'all forget that a nuclear reactor can be operated absolutely automatically, so that they can be planted everywhere.
Post Reply