"Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Monthly topics for discussion

Moderators: Krisi, Vega, TalkingPoint

kruwik
Member
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2014 8:00 pm
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by kruwik » Sun Mar 08, 2015 3:58 pm

In my opinion, marriages between the same sex shouldn't be permitted. I don't have got anything versus this kind of relationships, but they cannot have got any of children, so they cannot make a really family. Nowadays are more a couple of the same sex than 20 or 30 years ago. But I don't think it is a good idea that this kind of marriages should be permitted.

Lucywa
Member
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 12:44 pm
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Lucywa » Sun Mar 08, 2015 5:01 pm

I think that "marriages" between people of the same sex can't be permitted because it isn't normal. Love is diffrent but when man and man want to have children and be family - it isn't working. In my opinion only woman and man should have a law to get married. This relationship is natural and natura has created them to do this.

natalianowak
Member
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2014 5:09 pm
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by natalianowak » Sun Mar 08, 2015 5:30 pm

I think, that marriages between people of the same sex shouldn't be permitted, because I suppose that it isn't normal. Love between man and woman is perfect love, because of this relationships can be children. But on the other hand I don't against gays, but In my opinion they shouldn't take care of children. Nowadays are more a couple of the same sex, but I think, that this is only new trend, because people want to be original. It is very important at present

User avatar
aladrelich
Member
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2014 7:35 am
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by aladrelich » Sun Mar 08, 2015 6:05 pm

I thinkt that marriages between people of the same sex should be permitted, because love is love. Themost important is that they are in love and respect each other! Also they can be family to. Thankts to that abandoned children have a family! That is the most important! That they don't have to grow up in foster family or in family where they don'y be loved. In fact it is not our business who men or woman love! Their life not ours!

wiktoriasz
Member
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2014 5:14 pm
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by wiktoriasz » Sun Mar 08, 2015 6:37 pm

It's a hard and one of the most important question in recent years which have a lot of issue to consider. I'm tolerant person who follow the rule which is about to live own life and let the other part of world do the same. I think that homosexuals have the same law to love and show their happiness like a heterosexual couples. In conclusion marriages between people of the same sex should be legalized. They are just like we with the same bodies, brains, jobs, dreams and hearts full of feelings. Love knows no boundaries. And homosexuals should have no problems to get married.

OskiDz
Member
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2014 5:28 pm
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by OskiDz » Sun Mar 08, 2015 7:39 pm

I think that a marriage between persons of the same sex should be prohibited. Personally, I think that homosexual couples have become a fashion in the 21st century, and there isn't a defect. What is more I am a believer and I believe that God didn't create us so as to connect with people of the same sex, on the contrary.

klamolga
Member
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2014 7:33 am
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by klamolga » Sun Mar 08, 2015 7:43 pm

I think that marriage between people the same sex should be permitted. I don't mind it. Love is love and it isn't important between who. Everyone has a right to live in their own way. I can't understand people, who is against homosexual marriage. They don't have any rational argument, which convinces me to their opinion.

kowalskidzik
Member
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2014 7:32 am
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by kowalskidzik » Sun Mar 08, 2015 7:56 pm

Definitely not. I am opposed to same-sex unions. How do they imagine their children's future? It should be banned. Just married man-women should be. It disgust me.

dębskidzik
Member
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2014 7:31 am
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by dębskidzik » Sun Mar 08, 2015 8:14 pm

I am tolerant but traditional person. For me marriages between people of the same sex shouldn't be allowed. It's scary for me when two men are kissing each other. But i think that they can exist in peace and calm in their houses and i don't have probem with that .

KubaKoi
Member
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 4:27 pm
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by KubaKoi » Sun Mar 08, 2015 8:27 pm

In my opinion marriages between people of the same sex should'nt be permitted. It isn't normal, and if that marriages will be permitted, children will think this is normal, and we will have more marries between people of the same sex. I don't say they can't love each other. They can and I don't have anything against it, but marriage of two men or women isn't normal and it shouldn't be permitted.

OlaaMej
Member
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2014 12:35 pm
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by OlaaMej » Sun Mar 08, 2015 8:29 pm

Defenitely : YES. Why do heterosexual people should have more rights? We are all people. We should have the same rights to happiness. I really don't understend all this hatred for gays and lesbians. It's none of our buisness how they love, if they are happy. We should take care of our lives and stop interfere in their lives. :)

justynasta
Member
Posts: 18
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2014 12:15 am
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by justynasta » Sun Mar 08, 2015 8:33 pm

At bottom it doesn't interest me and I don't have opinion at this topic. Let them do what they want. I think that there are more important points to discuss for example the hunger on the world.

agatawerecka
Member
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2014 7:28 am
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by agatawerecka » Sun Mar 08, 2015 8:48 pm

As far as im concerned i don't care about it. I'm a tolerant person, I guess every man is the architekt of his own fortune. If someone actions have nothing in common with my life, let him do what he wants.
I am neither for nor against.

MajaPu
Member
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2014 7:30 am
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by MajaPu » Sun Mar 08, 2015 9:08 pm

I have no opinion on this topic. We should let everyone love who they want, not who we want:) Same like justynasta, i think there are more important things in life than this, like what should I wear 2morrow, ech...

Adifanstal
Member
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 8:43 pm
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Adifanstal » Sun Mar 08, 2015 9:08 pm

It can't exist. It's unnatural and don't have any sense. They couldn't have children. What's more, if they adopt child, what he can say in school, when teacher ask for your mother name? My mum name is John...
People don't have to be tolerant. If some media "force" us to be tolerant for homos why they aren't tolerant for us untolerant ;)

NaKuzajewska
Member
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2014 5:22 pm
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by NaKuzajewska » Sun Mar 08, 2015 9:11 pm

It is a hard question for me, because on the one hand the also are people, so they should do with their life what they want. But on the other hand if they colud have a weeding, they probably would like to adopt children and I can't imagine a little kid, who has two fathers or two mothers.

User avatar
Krisi
Keeper of the Board
Keeper of the Board
Posts: 4133
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 9:48 am
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Krisi » Sat Mar 14, 2015 11:55 am

not needed. {-: they r so free...

User avatar
reindeer
Gold Member
Posts: 401
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 6:57 am
Status: Other
Location: S-Pet
Contact:

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by reindeer » Sun Mar 15, 2015 12:00 pm

:shock: Is that possible?! :shock:

annmadej
Member
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2014 5:12 pm
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by annmadej » Sun Mar 15, 2015 10:26 pm

I thing that every person should be able to live in my own way, I think that such marriages should be allowed.

User avatar
reindeer
Gold Member
Posts: 401
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 6:57 am
Status: Other
Location: S-Pet
Contact:

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by reindeer » Mon Mar 16, 2015 8:20 am

annmadej wrote: every person should be able to live in my own way
...Judges had to thing it over twice and scratch their bald spots assiduously...
Taking into account the significance of the arguments, Holly Inquisition re-considered the matter once again, and announced them, lost souls, innocent! Since the moment they are allowed doing their lewdness here and there every now and then. Ahem!

SOATOAVINA
New Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 10:56 am
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by SOATOAVINA » Mon Mar 16, 2015 11:09 am

IT IS A COMMON AND WIDELY KNOWN PRACTICE IN RICH COUNTRIES TO DIVORCE AFTER SOME YEARS OF MARRIAGE. NOW, HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE WANT TO MARRY.

One thing is clear in this situation. They want to promote and defend their new situation. However, instead of just defending themselves, they prefer to attack by claiming their right to marry, and not just to marry, but to marry at church. The best defence is attack.

Homosexual are called Sodomite in the christian bible and the kuran. It has never been natural to have sex with someone of the same genre than oneself apart from the big and lustful city of Sodom and Gomorrah. So, the question is: is our country becoming Sodom2 and Gomorrah2?

OskiDz
Member
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2014 5:28 pm
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by OskiDz » Wed May 27, 2015 4:40 pm

I beg, just not this question.. Sorry, I'm intolerant. Let people do what they want but not before my eyes.

Basharuae
Member
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon May 25, 2015 6:16 am
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Basharuae » Thu Jul 09, 2015 8:29 am

GOD created ADAM and EVE not ADAM and STEVE, (no offense to anyone with the name Steve)

There is nothing called marriage of the same sex rather than sex between the same sex.

Because Logically, Historically, religiously, ethically...etc, marriage has consequences which do not exist when 2 of the same sex are together.

Marriage at least has husband (male) and wife (female).
so, how would the case be same sex.

theguest
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 11:47 pm
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by theguest » Sun Jan 03, 2016 5:20 pm

First of all, i have to say that i don't believe in gods or any supernatural entity. Ok now about the topic, i think marriages between homosexual shouldn't be allowed for several reasons: 1) I know this could be seen stupid, but in my opinion, homosexuality in general is a disease, a genetic defect that shouldn't be powered. 2) The marriage, by the definition, is the union between man and woman, if it's man-man, woman-woman, it can't be called marriage anymore. 3) Children. Think about them, and the moral and social "repercussions" that they will have.

User avatar
Krisi
Keeper of the Board
Keeper of the Board
Posts: 4133
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 9:48 am
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriage" between people of the same sex?

Post by Krisi » Sat Feb 27, 2016 3:32 am

This very question was raised by a correspondent during an interview to a boxing champion in my country which led to several outbursts from much of the society over the course of two weeks. When the boxer was asked if he supported same sex marriage he responded that he was not, stating that it was not supported in the Christian bible then proceeded to quote some lines from the holy book that directly opposed homosexuality. Subsequently one offended actor reacted to the champion's response in a harsh manner calling the boxer a "false prophet" resulting in his suspension from work.

In my opinion, the amount of negative attention that this incident attracted was entirely unnecessary, as the boxer was just honestly answering the question presented to him in the interview and his answer was not a direct strike towards the LGBT community rather it was his own take on this topic. The freedom of expression entitles anyone to his/her own opinion. What the boxer had quoted (from the bible) is true therefore, he should not in any case or condition be labelled as a false prophet. One does not have to be a prophet to quote any verse from the bible because the bible is for the guidance of all Christians.
Is it possible that the offended actor just didn't know the correct meaning of the word 'prophet'

User avatar
leking
New Member
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2017 12:06 pm
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by leking » Thu Mar 30, 2017 12:11 pm

The government, federal or state, has no business in defining what a marriage is or is not.

It's only concern should be identifying those who wish to establish themselves as a family household for the purposes of financial, medical, child guardianship matters.

Marriage was established as a religious sacrament long before the US or state governments were formed.

Government by dictating what is and is not a marriage, has established itself as the religious authority on the matter. This clearly violates our first amendment rights : "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion".

Do not let the federal or state governments dictate what a marriage is. That is the right of the people to decide for themselves.

If a group of individuals want to establish themselves as a family household, then the governments should legally recognize that and equally apply the laws to all households when it comes to taxes, inheritance, insurance and any other financial, medical, and child guardianship matters.

Leave it to people to call themselves married, unioned, joined, or what ever else their religion or philosophy calls it.

Marriage will continue to be an issue as long as the government stays in the religion business despite anything the Supreme Court rules on the matter.

Post Reply