To turn email notifications ON or OFF go to [Username] > User Control Panel > Board preferences > Edit notification options

"Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Monthly topics for discussion

Moderator: TalkingPoint

Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 10:56 am
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by SOATOAVINA » Mon Mar 16, 2015 11:09 am


One thing is clear in this situation. They want to promote and defend their new situation. However, instead of just defending themselves, they prefer to attack by claiming their right to marry, and not just to marry, but to marry at church. The best defence is attack.

Homosexual are called Sodomite in the christian bible and the kuran. It has never been natural to have sex with someone of the same genre than oneself apart from the big and lustful city of Sodom and Gomorrah. So, the question is: is our country becoming Sodom2 and Gomorrah2?

Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2014 5:28 pm
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by OskiDz » Wed May 27, 2015 4:40 pm

I beg, just not this question.. Sorry, I'm intolerant. Let people do what they want but not before my eyes.

Posts: 18
Joined: Mon May 25, 2015 6:16 am
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Basharuae » Thu Jul 09, 2015 8:29 am

GOD created ADAM and EVE not ADAM and STEVE, (no offense to anyone with the name Steve)

There is nothing called marriage of the same sex rather than sex between the same sex.

Because Logically, Historically, religiously, ethically...etc, marriage has consequences which do not exist when 2 of the same sex are together.

Marriage at least has husband (male) and wife (female).
so, how would the case be same sex.

Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 11:47 pm
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by theguest » Sun Jan 03, 2016 5:20 pm

First of all, i have to say that i don't believe in gods or any supernatural entity. Ok now about the topic, i think marriages between homosexual shouldn't be allowed for several reasons: 1) I know this could be seen stupid, but in my opinion, homosexuality in general is a disease, a genetic defect that shouldn't be powered. 2) The marriage, by the definition, is the union between man and woman, if it's man-man, woman-woman, it can't be called marriage anymore. 3) Children. Think about them, and the moral and social "repercussions" that they will have.

User avatar
Top Contributor
Top Contributor
Posts: 1773
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 9:48 am
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriage" between people of the same sex?

Post by Krisi » Sat Feb 27, 2016 3:32 am

This very question was raised by a correspondent during an interview to a boxing champion in my country which led to several outbursts from much of the society over the course of two weeks. When the boxer was asked if he supported same sex marriage he responded that he was not, stating that it was not supported in the Christian bible then proceeded to quote some lines from the holy book that directly opposed homosexuality. Subsequently one offended actor reacted to the champion's response in a harsh manner calling the boxer a "false prophet" resulting in his suspension from work.

In my opinion, the amount of negative attention that this incident attracted was entirely unnecessary, as the boxer was just honestly answering the question presented to him in the interview and his answer was not a direct strike towards the LGBT community rather it was his own take on this topic. The freedom of expression entitles anyone to his/her own opinion. What the boxer had quoted (from the bible) is true therefore, he should not in any case or condition be labelled as a false prophet. One does not have to be a prophet to quote any verse from the bible because the bible is for the guidance of all Christians.
Is it possible that the offended actor just didn't know the correct meaning of the word 'prophet'

User avatar
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2017 12:06 pm
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by leking » Thu Mar 30, 2017 12:11 pm

The government, federal or state, has no business in defining what a marriage is or is not.

It's only concern should be identifying those who wish to establish themselves as a family household for the purposes of financial, medical, child guardianship matters.

Marriage was established as a religious sacrament long before the US or state governments were formed.

Government by dictating what is and is not a marriage, has established itself as the religious authority on the matter. This clearly violates our first amendment rights : "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion".

Do not let the federal or state governments dictate what a marriage is. That is the right of the people to decide for themselves.

If a group of individuals want to establish themselves as a family household, then the governments should legally recognize that and equally apply the laws to all households when it comes to taxes, inheritance, insurance and any other financial, medical, and child guardianship matters.

Leave it to people to call themselves married, unioned, joined, or what ever else their religion or philosophy calls it.

Marriage will continue to be an issue as long as the government stays in the religion business despite anything the Supreme Court rules on the matter.

Post Reply