Sir,
The verb "to be" used ,without any main verb , may be considered as a main verb.
I am a doctor.
here verb "am" helping verb or main verb.
some one use "main verb" while other "ordinary verb".
What is difference between them.
Thanks.
to be
Moderator: Alan
- Alan
- Teacher/Moderator
- Posts: 15237
- Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 7:56 pm
- Status: Teacher of English
- Location: Japan
You seem to be confused about terminology: a MAIN verb is a finite verb, either the only or the first element in the verb phrase of a sentence, illustrated respectively by 'is' in
[1] He IS a doctor.
and
[2] The house IS cleaned every day .
Thus a main verb contrasts with a NONFINITE verb, such as 'being' in
[3] The food is BEING cooked.
The distinction to which you seem to be referring, however, is that between FULL verb and AUXILIARY verb, a quite different matter. When 'be' (or any form of it, finite or nonfinite) is complemented by a participle, it is termed an auxiliary verb, as in [2] and [3] above. Otherwise it is a full verb, as in [1].
Thus, as a main (or 'finite') verb it may be either full or auxiliary, and as a nonfinite verb it may equally be either full or auxiliary.
[1] He IS a doctor.
and
[2] The house IS cleaned every day .
Thus a main verb contrasts with a NONFINITE verb, such as 'being' in
[3] The food is BEING cooked.
The distinction to which you seem to be referring, however, is that between FULL verb and AUXILIARY verb, a quite different matter. When 'be' (or any form of it, finite or nonfinite) is complemented by a participle, it is termed an auxiliary verb, as in [2] and [3] above. Otherwise it is a full verb, as in [1].
Thus, as a main (or 'finite') verb it may be either full or auxiliary, and as a nonfinite verb it may equally be either full or auxiliary.