Is "which was" / "that was" necessary?

English grammar questions, answered by Alan

Moderator: Alan

Locked
User avatar
bawenang
Member
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun May 30, 2021 5:53 am
Status: Learner of English

Is "which was" / "that was" necessary?

Post by bawenang »

Greetings. I'm a new member in this forum. Nice to meet you all.

The reason I'm joining this forum is to ask about something that has bugged me for a while now. Which of these sentences is correct: "He was killed by a bus which was crossing over the road." or "He was killed by a bus crossing over the road." ? I was thinking that the second one is also correct but my friend said that only the first one is correct.

Thanks.
User avatar
Alan
Teacher/Moderator
Teacher/Moderator
Posts: 15237
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 7:56 pm
Status: Teacher of English
Location: Japan

Re: Is "which was" / "that was" necessary?

Post by Alan »

Both are grammatical but the first is absurd: it is presumably the pedestrian, and not the bus, that was doing the crossing...
Locked