Employer charged over not paying maid for 13 months.
Should it be "charged with" instead?
Thanks!
Should it be "charged with" instead?
Moderator: Alan
-
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 602
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 3:58 pm
- Status: Learner of English
- Alan
- Teacher/Moderator
- Posts: 15237
- Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 7:56 pm
- Status: Teacher of English
- Location: Japan
Re: Should it be "charged with" instead?
No, correct as written, since what follows is simply a description of the offence, but not its statutory name (cf. e.g. charged with fraud)