Do you think that US will control the world?

Let others know the latest news, or discuss it with them.

Moderators: Vega, EC

Sir f(x)=2x-3
New Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 5:01 pm
Location: Spain
Contact:

There are no politicians

Postby Sir f(x)=2x-3 » Thu Nov 11, 2004 8:28 pm

I think the USA IS controlling the world. But I think it's a mistake to say that american presidents or politicians are controlling the other countries. In the USA -and in many other countries, too- multinational corporations are the ones who rule the things. Actually, all the important right-wing politicians, like Bush or Kerry, own one or more of these corporations. And, of course, they want MONEY, and if somebody wants money more than anything else, he/she can't be a good president. It's simple:
Bush wants money. Bush makes war with Irak, so he gains money from petroleum and weapon commerces. Some Americans are happy because they think Bush is defeating terrorism -although he is increasing it. Then these people votes Bush again, and Bush becomes rich, rich and rich, while innocent civilians in Irak become poor, poor, and dead. And some people keep on thinking that he only wants good things for the world.

And I want to say to final things:
1.To the people who vote Bush, Kerry or any other right-wing party in any country: the dictionary says that right-wing means capitalist. And capitalism is only good for rich people, so if you are not rich, don't vote them.
2.To the people who think that terrorists do bad things because they are bad: nobody will hurt you if you don't give them any reason to do it.

basty14@hotmail.com

Guest

Re: There are no politicians

Postby Guest » Thu Nov 11, 2004 8:38 pm

Sir f(x)=2x-3 wrote: Bush becomes rich, rich and rich, while innocent civilians in Irak become poor, poor, and dead. And some people keep on thinking that he only wants good things for the world.
basty14@hotmail.com

Tell me why he's becoming rich out of that stupid war? His salary for being a president is less than a TV reporter. He doesn't gain anything without the approval from the Congress and stuff. He's rich because his dad is rich. Kerry is rich because his wife is rich. The ketchup company they have is under his wife's last name. Tell me where you've got the source saying that dumb Bush will become rich after the war. His salary would gain because he defeated Iraq? Give me the link to your source, otherwise do more research.

yuniu
Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:25 am
Location: China

Postby yuniu » Fri Nov 12, 2004 1:50 am

Yes. U.S has been involving the domestic affair of other countries taking the advantage of human right to come up their own greedy ambitious. That’s why U.S politicians are always saying “God bless America”

Guest

Postby Guest » Fri Nov 12, 2004 2:15 am

yuniu wrote:Yes. U.S has been involving the domestic affair of other countries taking the advantage of human right to come up their own greedy ambitious. That’s why U.S politicians are always saying “God bless America”

When you say something like that, you should come up with something such as a source from where you've heard it to prove your point. It has nothing to do with that line. "God bless America" is just a saying like "god bless you." If you have noticed, on the US money we have " In God we trust" line. Although America is a melting pot but it still somehow is like a white-man country. They believe in God. That's why they say good bless....

Sir f(x)=2x-3
New Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 5:01 pm
Location: Spain
Contact:

Postby Sir f(x)=2x-3 » Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:47 pm

Simply bessed with love wrote:
Tell me why he's becoming rich out of that stupid war? His salary for being a president is less than a TV reporter. He doesn't gain anything without the approval from the Congress and stuff. He's rich because his dad is rich. Kerry is rich because his wife is rich. The ketchup company they have is under his wife's last name. Tell me where you've got the source saying that dumb Bush will become rich after the war. His salary would gain because he defeated Iraq? Give me the link to your source, otherwise do more research.


The Bush family gains money in many ways, and two of this ways are the petroleum commerce, and the weapon commerce (this is also said in my first message). This means war is good for them, because without war, there is no weapon commerce. And if the war is in a place with petroleum, bonus score. Anyway, I don't think bush minds if people in Irak are dead or alive.
basty14@hotmail.com

Guest

Postby Guest » Sat Nov 13, 2004 3:09 am

Sir f(x)=2x-3 wrote:Simply bessed with love wrote:
Tell me why he's becoming rich out of that stupid war? His salary for being a president is less than a TV reporter. He doesn't gain anything without the approval from the Congress and stuff. He's rich because his dad is rich. Kerry is rich because his wife is rich. The ketchup company they have is under his wife's last name. Tell me where you've got the source saying that dumb Bush will become rich after the war. His salary would gain because he defeated Iraq? Give me the link to your source, otherwise do more research.


The Bush family gains money in many ways, and two of this ways are the petroleum commerce, and the weapon commerce (this is also said in my first message). This means war is good for them, because without war, there is no weapon commerce. And if the war is in a place with petroleum, bonus score. Anyway, I don't think bush minds if people in Irak are dead or alive.
basty14@hotmail.com

Good defending paragraph. I see someone has done his homework. :wink:

User avatar
maryemily
Silver Member
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 2:16 pm
Location: Brazil

Postby maryemily » Mon Nov 15, 2004 10:45 pm

We don't care because what's the need to stop them?


sorry, i did not understand this.

User avatar
darwen
Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 2:04 am

Re: Do you think that US will control the world?

Postby darwen » Tue Nov 16, 2004 3:01 am

I think there must be a long-time peace after a world war,for example,Economy increases rapidly after the World-War 1st and the World-war 2nd.So it is very dangerous for a super nation to control the world.There must be other strength and emerge and keep the world peace.And I know Clinton have no right to run for the Secretary-General of the United Nations.Because U.S.A. is a permanent member of the United Nations.But according to the world's situation,U.S.A. occupies the absolute predominance to intervent the world's affairs.So long as U.S.A. considers panhuman interests,there will be opposite.

Guest

Postby Guest » Tue Nov 16, 2004 7:41 am

maryemily wrote:
We don't care because what's the need to stop them?


sorry, i did not understand this.

I said in my last paragraph, I believe we never said we're the leader of the world. Everyone else thinks so. We don't care because what's the need to stop them?, it means we're not the one who say we're the leader of the world. Everyone thinks that way. I admit that our economy is the number one or the strongest in the world, but it doesn't put us to where we will be the leader of the world. We never announce that. What that stupid Bush has done does not represent what most of Americans think, well not for those who are Democrats. People think we're controlling and we're the leader sometimes don't base on our economy's fact. They say that because we have strong military and we're the threat to most countries. Whatever way, it's true. It's a fact so what is the need to stop people thinking that way when it is. No matter how much we argue, people won't stop thinking that way. Thus, whatever, be that way.

shinjo2000
New Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 12:15 pm

so

Postby shinjo2000 » Wed Feb 09, 2005 12:40 pm

i dont think US will but China will!
an ancient civilization is rising and going to become the biggest threat of the peace of the world.
i am what i am

User avatar
luckygirl9
Silver Member
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 6:10 am
Status: English Learner
Location: Shanghai,China
Contact:

Re: so

Postby luckygirl9 » Mon Feb 14, 2005 5:26 am

shinjo2000 wrote:i dont think US will but China will!
Well,I don't know where are you from,but it couldn't be China,yeah? :lol: China is a developing country,and it has protential energy which may one day become strong enough,but i can say,China has lots of national problems,especially in governments.Constitutions in China are sometimes not reasonable and acceptable compared to foreign countries,but maybe,this can be known by ourselves which won't show out to the world.Anyway,even if one day we had the power to lead the whole world,we wouldn't control it.

User avatar
Dithzie
Member
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 11:17 am
Location: Asia

Postby Dithzie » Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:48 pm

Everybody wake up! Remove your rose-colored glasses. US already has control of the world. It's the most powerful country in the world right now and it will continue to do so until some other country becomes stronger again (probably China). Tell me who can dare oppose the US and get away with it. It's a law unto itself. Just look at what happened in Iraq. Even if a lot of countries opposed the war, which includes the United Nations I might add, the US did not budge on it's position and still declared war.

Bush knows this so he hides his agenda under the "terrorist-countries-have-nuclear-weapons-must-eliminate-or-remove-them-by-force" program. By destabilizing the Middle East, the United States and Bush gain by getting the upper hand and controlling oil productions in the region, if not in world.

Don't get me wrong. I'm not anti-US or anything of the sort. Am just saying things as I see them and this is what I see in this stupid war in Iraq where a lot of people has died already trying to find non-existent so-called "weapons of mass destructions".
Iamwhoam

Guest

Postby Guest » Tue Feb 15, 2005 8:32 pm

Dithzie wrote:Everybody wake up! Remove your rose-colored glasses. US already has control of the world. It's the most powerful country in the world right now and it will continue to do so until some other country becomes stronger again (probably China).Tell me who can dare oppose the US and get away with it. It's a law unto itself. Just look at what happened in Iraq. Even if a lot of countries opposed the war, which includes the United Nations I might add, the US did not budge on it's position and still declared war.

The question is WILL, meaning in the future, so I guess your answer is China????

User avatar
Trantrung
Silver Member
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 1:25 am
Status: Other
Location: VN

Postby Trantrung » Thu Mar 10, 2005 2:52 am

I don't think US want to control the world. I think It only wants all coutries in the world live in American style :lol:
I wander'd lonely as a cloud

Guest

Postby Guest » Thu Mar 10, 2005 7:01 am

Trantrung wrote:I don't think US want to control the world. I think It only wants all coutries in the world live in American style :lol:

I believe, one couldn't be white-washed if he/she was not white-washed himself/herself. In another words, one wouldn't act American, be Americanized, follow American culture if he/she didn't try to forget his/her own.

User avatar
luckygirl9
Silver Member
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 6:10 am
Status: English Learner
Location: Shanghai,China
Contact:

Postby luckygirl9 » Thu Mar 10, 2005 10:50 am

Trantrung wrote: I think It only wants all coutries in the world live in American style :lol:

Really?I don't think so,I quite agree with simpleblessedwithlove,if I follow your opinion,then maybe your VN people have to live like Americans? :roll: :o

Hardi
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1222
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 7:44 pm
Status: Other
Location: European Union

Postby Hardi » Thu Mar 10, 2005 11:47 am

Well I cant speak for America.. I'm not american, but In my viewpoint. Some weak/litle countryes just have inferiority complex and then they fawn to america to much... to get some good word from Mr. bush, or to get... whatever they need.

Well I hope that at least Estonia don't need never, ever bootlick america or anybody else anymore, since we have now members of EU and NATO.

User avatar
luckygirl9
Silver Member
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 6:10 am
Status: English Learner
Location: Shanghai,China
Contact:

Postby luckygirl9 » Sat Mar 12, 2005 3:10 am

Hardi wrote:Well I hope that at least Estonia don't need never, ever bootlick america or anybody else anymore, since we have now members of EU and NATO.

I absolutely agree with you,anytime,anywhere,to conserve your chaste soul,your sovereignty is always up to the first.

jackfook
Member
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:00 am
Location: Malaysia

Postby jackfook » Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:37 am

in fact,USA is controlling the world.Although she is not rich as Arabic countries which have plenty of petroleum,USA is leader of the world.She has advance technology which can fulfill her dream of creating nuclear and exploring the universe.She has a strength economy which guarantees jobs for her people.Her enthusiasm of loving science and respecting freedom encourages her people to learn from others in order to improve their life.She has strong politic influence who can affect the world.Am I right?

User avatar
luckygirl9
Silver Member
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 6:10 am
Status: English Learner
Location: Shanghai,China
Contact:

Postby luckygirl9 » Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:26 am

jackfook wrote:She has a strength economy which guarantees jobs for her people.Her enthusiasm of loving science and respecting freedom encourages her people to learn from others in order to improve their life.She has strong politic influence who can affect the world.Am I right?

Apparently what you said is a fact.I've asked the same quesiton to my American teacher and he admitted that US is now very strong but it may sometime be replaced by China.I just deem that he was prasing us,at least I'm absolutely demur his idea.
Well if a country is too powerful that no one could control it,it can just keep still but not to invade others,otherwise,it will lead to boycotts.The history has showed us.

Guest

Postby Guest » Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:33 am

luckygirl9 wrote:
jackfook wrote:She has a strength economy which guarantees jobs for her people.Her enthusiasm of loving science and respecting freedom encourages her people to learn from others in order to improve their life.She has strong politic influence who can affect the world.Am I right?

Apparently what you said is a fact.I've asked the same quesiton to my American teacher and he admitted that US is now very strong but it may sometime be replaced by China.I just deem that he was prasing us,at least I'm absolutely demur his idea.
Well if a country is too powerful that no one could control it,it can just keep still but not to invade others,otherwise,it will lead to boycotts.The history has showed us.

Yeah, if the Americans don't be careful, they will be replaced in the international marketing by China in another fifty years. China and Singapore are like two hidden tigers that are waiting for their turns. Quite scary for those American bussiness people.


Return to “Current News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests