Michael Jackson= Innocent?????

Let others know the latest news, or discuss it with them.

Moderators: Vega, EC

Guest

Michael Jackson= Innocent?????

Postby Guest » Wed Mar 09, 2005 12:13 pm

Are you following his recent news? If yes, what do you think of it?

User avatar
Ms.A.Z
Gold Member
Posts: 316
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 11:23 am
Status: Other
Contact:

Postby Ms.A.Z » Sun Mar 13, 2005 7:45 am

HI

I saw Micheal Jackson's news on a program called 20/20 in MBC 4 and I really feel like he is guilty. Every evidence is against him but Im sure he will win this time too and set free.

Guest

Postby Guest » Wed Mar 16, 2005 12:37 am

Ms.A.Z wrote:HI

I saw Micheal Jackson's news on a program called 20/20 in MBC 4 and I really feel like he is guilty. Every evidence is against him but Im sure he will win this time too and set free.

You think so? I think those evidences didn't do him justice. They were just for the prosecutors who wanted some fame and families who wanted a pinch of Jackson's money. Most of the boy who had to testify told the court that they did not sleep with Michael. Also, they were free in Neverland. To me, he's a celebrity to has mental problems, but not a child molestor.

User avatar
Shazzam
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1201
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 4:40 am
Location: Australia

Postby Shazzam » Tue Apr 12, 2005 12:49 am

I'm a massive fan of Michael Jacksons talent. During the 70's and 80's he was definately KING of the music industry. I don't think anyone would deny that. I have watched and waited as all the events of the last several years have unfolded against him. Everyone around me believed he was guilty :twisted: but not me. I must admit my opinion is starting to change. I feel so sorry for him he has some pretty heavy demons in his wardrobe. It seems strange to me that his family hasn't been there during the course of his life (much) and they are there now. It all seems to be a little too late. I really won't be surprised at all if a GUILTY verdict is found in this case. There have been too many payoffs; not this time.

I really don't think the issue here is about sexual intercourse (or sleeping with children). He is into the masterbation side of things ; which is really worrying. Most of the testamonies given (present and past) have related to feeling, touching, oral sex etc. From what I have read on these sorts of topics that is usually the way the offenders work. It also seems that most of the victims have come from unstable family backgrounds (another sure fire sign). These are usually easier targets; as they are looking for attention and love.

Its all really sad. He has not only ruined his life but taken so many young soles with him.
:evil: :twisted:

Guest

Postby Guest » Tue Apr 12, 2005 2:06 am

shazzam1452 wrote: I'm a massive fan of Michael Jacksons talent. During the 70's and 80's he was definately KING of the music industry. I don't think anyone would deny that.

Yes! I've watched his biography movie. Up till now I don't think anyone in the music industry could achieve what he has had. I could be wrong, though. But to me, no one could.

shazzam1452 wrote: I have watched and waited as all the events of the last several years have unfolded against him. Everyone around me believed he was guilty :twisted: but not me. I must admit my opinion is starting to change.

Really? It's different for me. At first, I believed he was guilty because the case was strange and semi-sexual. But it has been too strange that I've been starting to doubt myself. I'm starting to think if the whole case has been what the media want me to see or there are more to it.
I belive he's psycho, but not that psycho. He's been through a lot; therefore, he'll be a hard work of any psychotherapist. I think what he needs is not going to the court or deal with those people who are like parasite sucking his fortune to be famous. Instead, he should have gone to therapy to solve his inner problems. A lot of things have added that lead to his weird behaviors now. *Sigh* what a loss! What a loss!
shazzam1452 wrote: I really don't think the issue here is about sexual intercourse (or sleeping with children). He is into the masterbation side of things ; which is really worrying. Most of the testamonies given (present and past) have related to feeling, touching, oral sex etc. From what I have read on these sorts of topics that is usually the way the offenders work.

If it's not about that, they wouldn't try to nail him. Trying to prove he's slept with those kids is all they have. If they could prove it, he could face years in jail, pay the fines and register as a sex offender for the rest of his life. Proving that he's masturbated and kept pornos wouldn't do much for the case. They're just examples that those might be reasons why he is interested in kids, but they're not proves that he's slept with them. The prosecutors have been working really hard to find the way to convince the Judge; however, there is still some doubt since the lawyer who sues him has been on his back for years. He's failed once and now he's trying again. If he won this case, he would have million of dollars and fame. In addition, the families who sue him are poor. Most of them need money badly and as we know money is the source of all evil and good. They can lie to get the money or they're telling the truth, we don't know. I seriously don't know and think which side I should believe.

shazzam1452 wrote:It also seems that most of the victims have come from unstable family backgrounds (another sure fire sign). These are usually easier targets; as they are looking for attention and love.

Its all really sad. He has not only ruined his life but taken so many young soles with him.
:evil: :twisted:

It's funny that those families knew he was psycho and all, but they still let their kids stay at Neverland. The boys, at first, denied they were sexually harrassed. Now, they've changed their words--they were sexually harrassed. What made them change their words? What? What? Please, tell us the truth. :?

User avatar
Shazzam
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1201
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 4:40 am
Location: Australia

Postby Shazzam » Tue Apr 12, 2005 2:40 am

I can agree with some of your thoughts for sure. The only confusion is from what I have gathered about the case it isn't that he masturbates on his own; he does it in front of minors and then he assists them with masturbation. Those actions are criminal and you can be prosecuted for that; you don't have to have sexual intercourse to be prosecuted under the Crime Act. There seems that there is a long history of this type of behaviour. I think that is why the prosectution is going after him with such vigor. If these people are all lying god help them :twisted: :evil:

The problem also is that Michael Jackson has told so many lies that most of the general public doesn't know what to believe when it comes out of his mouth. I mean for god sake he got on national tv and told Oprah that he had only had a couple of plastic surgery procedures, that he suffers from a skin disease that has made his skin turn white; I mean really. How dumb does he think people are. I mean his nose nearly fell off from all the procedures he has had. There are a couple of plastic surgery web-sites that detail the procedures he has done and also give photographic evidence. You should check them out.

He was such a handsome guy. He must hate his father something shocking that he has put himself through this amount of pain to totally change his face. Listen to "Man in the Mirror". I think that song sums it up!

The world will stay tuned with interest!!

Guest

Postby Guest » Tue Apr 12, 2005 2:56 am

shazzam1452 wrote:I can agree with some of your thoughts for sure. The only confusion is from what I have gathered about the case it isn't that he masturbates on his own; he does it in front of minors and then he assists them with masturbation. Those actions are criminal and you can be prosecuted for that; you don't have to have sexual intercourse to be prosecuted under the Crime Act. There seems that there is a long history of this type of behaviour. I think that is why the prosectution is going after him with such vigor. If these people are all lying god help them :twisted: :evil:

I know what you mean but the thing is are those video tapes they say they have real? :? It's hard to say.

User avatar
Shazzam
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1201
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 4:40 am
Location: Australia

Michael Jackson - Innocent or Guilty?

Postby Shazzam » Wed Apr 13, 2005 9:39 am

What Video tapes? Any info? I haven't heard about any videos; we only get very limited daily coverage (not a big issue here). Tell me more? ;) [/list][/quote]

Guest

Re: Michael Jackson - Innocent or Guilty?

Postby Guest » Sat Apr 16, 2005 5:53 pm

shazzam1452 wrote:What Video tapes? Any info? I haven't heard about any videos; we only get very limited daily coverage (not a big issue here). Tell me more? ;)

Sorry, I forgot to answer your post :oops: . Here is the link,
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050415/ap_en_mu/michael_jackson_13
This is what I'm talking about.

RedRose

Postby RedRose » Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:43 am

Michael Jacksons is a HUGE pervert. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

User avatar
Dixie
Miss EnglishClub.com 2006
Miss EnglishClub.com 2006
Posts: 6336
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 2:08 pm
Status: English Teacher
Location: Catalunya
Contact:

Postby Dixie » Fri Jun 10, 2005 8:44 am

Let's wait for the results, although I don't care about them at all. If he's guilty, he should go to prison (although if the American system is like the Spanish one, he might be freed immediately).

User avatar
Lalee
Platinum Member
Posts: 708
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 2:53 am
Location: Peru

Postby Lalee » Fri Jun 10, 2005 6:12 pm

Dixie wrote:Let's wait for the results, although I don't care about them at all. If he's guilty, he should go to prison (although if the American system is like the Spanish one, he might be freed immediately).


How's that, Dix? A person like him might be freed in your country? :roll:

User avatar
Dixie
Miss EnglishClub.com 2006
Miss EnglishClub.com 2006
Posts: 6336
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 2:08 pm
Status: English Teacher
Location: Catalunya
Contact:

Postby Dixie » Sat Jun 11, 2005 8:30 pm

I mean that our law system is so bad that criminals are freed after some years in prison "for good behavior". Penoso, verdad?

User avatar
MissLT
Ethereal Member
Posts: 3939
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
Status: Other

Postby MissLT » Sat Jun 11, 2005 8:30 pm

seal wrote:Quiet honestly I don't know what to do think about him. The whole thing is very confusing me. I wonder how the jury will decide.

The case has been going for too long. One of the jurors got kicked out of the team, Jacko is selling his Beatle collection ( I think), etc.
http://news.findlaw.com/ap/o/51/05-30-2005/e6a90017f6ea7b5c.html
If he's found guilty, he could face up to 20 years in prison. *sigh*.......

User avatar
Lalee
Platinum Member
Posts: 708
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 2:53 am
Location: Peru

Postby Lalee » Sun Jun 12, 2005 5:26 am

Dixie wrote:I mean that our law system is so bad that criminals are freed after some years in prison "for good behavior". Penoso, verdad?


Oh, I get it now. :)

manrat
Silver Member
Posts: 78
Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 6:06 pm
Status: English Learner
Location: Germany/USA

Postby manrat » Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:30 pm

The jury just found him not guilty on all charges.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/13/jackson.trial/

User avatar
Shazzam
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1201
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 4:40 am
Location: Australia

Postby Shazzam » Mon Jun 13, 2005 10:36 pm

Now that he has been found NOT GUILTY on ALL Charges. I hope the media and the police will leave him alone. No matter what anyone thinks this should be the end of it now. I think he will just totally disappear out of view now.

User avatar
Shazzam
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1201
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 4:40 am
Location: Australia

Postby Shazzam » Tue Jun 14, 2005 11:46 pm

I think the parents of the children involved in this case should be on trial, for too many reasons to list! Firstly and foremost explotation. I mean really who in their right mind (as a parent) would allow their children to share a bed with a grown man...it is neglect on their part. Putting the prosecutors etc in the middle doesn't help the case. They are just doing their jobs.

Just my opinion.

User avatar
MissLT
Ethereal Member
Posts: 3939
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
Status: Other

Postby MissLT » Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:22 pm

shazzam1452 wrote:I think the parents of the children involved in this case should be on trial, for too many reasons to list! Firstly and foremost explotation. I mean really who in their right mind (as a parent) would allow their children to share a bed with a grown man...it is neglect on their part. Putting the prosecutors etc in the middle doesn't help the case. They are just doing their jobs.

Just my opinion.

Agree with you totally. I mean, what kinda loudsy parents are they? Letting their kids stay at Neverland, letting them sleep in the same bed with a psycho and sueing the guy for sleeping the same bed with their children--what the hell?!!?!?!?!?
My family never allows us to have a sleep-over at my friends' houses. The US is too sick with many sex-maniacs. You never know if your childrent might get raped by a friend's parent in a sleeping-over night. Whatcha gonna do after it's happened? Sue the guy? Too late, your kids already got raped. Overall, trust your friends, but sleep at home.


Return to “Current News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests