Lenny this is a different guy. His name is Jesse Lee Petersen (NOT JACKSON). :?LennyeTran wrote:Funny, this is the same person who spoke about this guy in other topic,danyet wrote: I am not saying anything different that some Black spokesmen themselves have already said such as the Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson.
Read this:
http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=46440
"Rev. Jesse Jackson is a controversial figure in the USA. He does not speak for all Blacks. Many Americans of African herritage think that he has done a disservice to the Minority cause in America on countless issues. He, for a Reverand, has shown himself to be hypocritical in his personal life especially in the treatment of his own wife. He is not a good role model for the people he professes to stand for. Personally I think that he just like to be a "celebrity"."
Now you're taking his words or posting his words? What really is your intention behind all this, huh? I'm sensing something fishy here.
HURRICANE KATRINA - Destroys New Orleans
Moderator: EC
- Shazzam
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 738
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 4:40 am
- Location: Australia
- MissLT
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 2530
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
- Status: Other
Oh yeah, just reading the article and checking the names. I saw Jess and i thought they were the same guy. I didn't pay attention to the last names. Okay, I'm taking whatever I said earlier back. Sorry Danyet for my mistake. Sorry. Sorry guys for the confusing. Heheheheh... how embarrassing! Heheheheheh... And thanks Shazzam to point out my mistake, by the way. I owe you one.shazzam1452 wrote: Lenny this is a different guy. His name is Jesse Lee Petersen (NOT JACKSON). :?
- Shazzam
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 738
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 4:40 am
- Location: Australia
I thought it was better I tell you than Danyet.LennyeTran wrote:Oh yeah, just reading the article and checking the names. I saw Jess and i thought they were the same guy. I didn't pay attention to the last names. Okay, I'm taking whatever I said earlier back. Sorry Danyet for my mistake. Sorry. Sorry guys for the confusing. Heheheheh... how embarrassing! Heheheheheh... And thanks Shazzam to point out my mistake, by the way. I owe you one.shazzam1452 wrote: Lenny this is a different guy. His name is Jesse Lee Petersen (NOT JACKSON). :?
- MissLT
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 2530
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
- Status: Other
- Danyet
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 2:29 am
- Status: Teacher of English
- Location: USA
No I wouldn't. I knew that some would confuse the two. Peterson is not popular amongst Liberal Democrat crowd and therefore media does not cover him as much as Jackson.
Peterson is amongst a growing minority of Black speakers. I like this guy. He is from the "roots". He is not as articulate or slick as Jackson. His message is not well received by those who expect things to "fall into their lap" . He says that Black Americans must build strong families again and that Jackson has set bad examples, by his treatment towards his own wife.
Peterson is amongst a growing minority of Black speakers. I like this guy. He is from the "roots". He is not as articulate or slick as Jackson. His message is not well received by those who expect things to "fall into their lap" . He says that Black Americans must build strong families again and that Jackson has set bad examples, by his treatment towards his own wife.
- Danyet
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 2:29 am
- Status: Teacher of English
- Location: USA
This is an old tradition of the English language. It goes along with referring to ships in the feminine and such. A few years back some women complained about the tradition of storms being given feminine names that they started to name some storms with mens names. I find storms with mens names to be irritating.LennyeTran wrote:No. Still the same old "donation for victims of Katrina." One thing really annoys me is why they have to name all the frigging storms and hurricanes as girl's names? :x
- Shazzam
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 738
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 4:40 am
- Location: Australia
I would say that the storms themselves are more irritating than there names.danyet wrote:This is an old tradition of the English language. It goes along with referring to ships in the feminine and such. A few years back some women complained about the tradition of storms being given feminine names that they started to name some storms with mens names. I find storms with mens names to be irritating.LennyeTran wrote:No. Still the same old "donation for victims of Katrina." One thing really annoys me is why they have to name all the frigging storms and hurricanes as girl's names? :x
- Shazzam
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 738
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 4:40 am
- Location: Australia
- Shazzam
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 738
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 4:40 am
- Location: Australia
Praying is great; but i'm sorry I don't believe that it is the best thing we can do for them. These people need, food, clothes, medical supplies and money to assist in the clean up and rebuilding of their homes. We need to help with these things.hedwig14 wrote:the best thing to do is pray for them... its the biggest help we could ever give.
- Shazzam
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 738
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 4:40 am
- Location: Australia
- Shazzam
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 738
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 4:40 am
- Location: Australia
I have just finished watching a program called 'Frontline' on television. They had a documentary on the situation with Hurricane Katrina (late response).
What a mess. The Clinton administration set a new director into FEMA after the "OLD BUSH" administration had totally failed (by giving jobs to mates). With the new director in place (who had specialised in emergency/disaster relief) Fema was doing well and was able to handle many large scale emergencies.
It would appear that under "JNR BUSH" Fema has been taken back to 'Daddy's' ideal (jobs for the boys, no qualifications required).
FEMA has now lost all rights and Bush has set up a larger scale department that includes HOMELAND SECURITY, FEMA etc. etc. There were just so many departments that I couldn't grab all of their names.
It was a very interesting program, I really think at the end of the day the BUSH administration has totally stuffed up! AGAIN!
What a mess. The Clinton administration set a new director into FEMA after the "OLD BUSH" administration had totally failed (by giving jobs to mates). With the new director in place (who had specialised in emergency/disaster relief) Fema was doing well and was able to handle many large scale emergencies.
It would appear that under "JNR BUSH" Fema has been taken back to 'Daddy's' ideal (jobs for the boys, no qualifications required).
FEMA has now lost all rights and Bush has set up a larger scale department that includes HOMELAND SECURITY, FEMA etc. etc. There were just so many departments that I couldn't grab all of their names.
It was a very interesting program, I really think at the end of the day the BUSH administration has totally stuffed up! AGAIN!
- Shazzam
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 738
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 4:40 am
- Location: Australia
Yes I do understand that happens everywhere in the world (media sensationalism) however, most past and present members of Fema were interviewed together with the footage from the media coverage during the Katrina crisis. You just can't deny that no one knew what they were doing. :? Locals say that they asked for defined help; FEMA says that they didn't. Why should you have to define the help that you require if this is an organisation set up to deal with disaster relief. :? In addition tabled reports with setup disaster situations were never completed as the White House withdrew funding. The project name was HURRICANE PAM.danyet wrote:But you have to understand that Frontline is a television program produced by Bush and Republican haters in the first place. They do their job well!
The other obvious fact is that FEMA was run so well under the Clinton administration and has collapsed under the Bush administration. The obvious reason is staff placement.
- Danyet
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 2:29 am
- Status: Teacher of English
- Location: USA
- Shazzam
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 738
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 4:40 am
- Location: Australia
At the end of the day I just don't think political preference should enter into a debate about an organisation setup to help American people with disaster relief. It doesn't matter who is in government; what matters is that the funding is kept up to these organisations to provide the services that they were designed for. America has large populations living in areas that are prone to, earthquake, flood, tornados, etc. You would have to be a foolish person to think that all these natural disasters are just going to go away; so that you no longer have to look at the fiscal issues.danyet wrote:I think that part of the problem is that FEMA is looked at by many as a prelude to "Big Brother" organizion and is feared by the far Right. This may have something to do with Clinton funding the program so well since the Democratic Party is the party of Big Brother.
-
- Member
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 2:36 pm
- Location: China
Bush is athority or u are athurity?danyet wrote:That is not true. People are taking whatever they need. They are not being shot. However, the situation is made worse by another element that I have no explanation for. The people are being kept against their will in that superdome that is on the news. They want to get out and go to safety outside the city but they have been LOCKED INSIDE by so-called athorities. There is only one road that now leads out of the city BUT a check point or road block has been set up there to prevent anyone from escaping.Arale wrote:More terrible, all people who gather what's left are shot immediately.
_Arale_
A group of tourists who had to leave their hotels tried to walk out of the city but police fired warning shots over their heads to make them turn around. Those police are lucky that I was not there..... because I would have shot back.
This is very disturbing. Why is government taken citizen rights off these people? On whos' athority? Who is in charge? I want his name.
I know u are a kind-hearted person.
- Shazzam
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 738
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 4:40 am
- Location: Australia
- MissLT
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 2530
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
- Status: Other
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060302/ap_ ... rina_videoShazzam wrote:I really don't believe the BUSH is a racist! I don't believe that he sat back and did nothing in the hope that black-americans would die. I just think he has poor organisational skills and makes bad choices. I mean lets face it the guy can hardly string a sentence together without help. :(
He was warned about this, but he refused to acknowledge it.
- Shazzam
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 738
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 4:40 am
- Location: Australia
I don't know if I agree with that. A natural disaster is a very hard thing to assess.LennyeTran wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060302/ap_ ... rina_videoShazzam wrote:I really don't believe the BUSH is a racist! I don't believe that he sat back and did nothing in the hope that black-americans would die. I just think he has poor organisational skills and makes bad choices. I mean lets face it the guy can hardly string a sentence together without help. :(
He was warned about this, but he refused to acknowledge it.
- Danyet
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 2:29 am
- Status: Teacher of English
- Location: USA
- Dixie
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 3836
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 2:08 pm
- Status: Teacher of English
- Location: Catalunya
- Unknownsu
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 721
- Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 3:10 am
- Status: Other
- Location: Canada
Danyet is lying. It was me! I went out to the Caribbean and started stirring the ocean with my trusty spoon!danyet wrote:Stop! I can't take it anymore! ......It was me . I did it. I was the one resposible for Katrina! I knew there was a big storm comming. I saw all the weather reports but I did nothing. Sorry!
- MissLT
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 2530
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
- Status: Other
He was supposed to respond, but he did not. This is what the whole video is about. And when he actually did, thousands people had died. Even the whole thing was a natural disaster, the U.S was one of the nations that can detect this kinda thing coming. If the government had responded with proper care, the loss of deaths could have been less.Shazzam wrote:I don't know if I agree with that. A natural disaster is a very hard thing to assess.LennyeTran wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060302/ap_ ... rina_videoShazzam wrote:I really don't believe the BUSH is a racist! I don't believe that he sat back and did nothing in the hope that black-americans would die. I just think he has poor organisational skills and makes bad choices. I mean lets face it the guy can hardly string a sentence together without help. :(
He was warned about this, but he refused to acknowledge it.
- MissLT
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 2530
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
- Status: Other
Baby, are you still trying to defend for Bush? Because if you are, we're gonna have a big fight about that idiot.danyet wrote:Stop! I can't take it anymore! ......It was me . I did it. I was the one resposible for Katrina! I knew there was a big storm comming. I saw all the weather reports but I did nothing. Sorry!
- Danyet
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 2:29 am
- Status: Teacher of English
- Location: USA
- MissLT
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 2530
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
- Status: Other
How can you assure that Kerry wouldn't be a better man than Bush for the position? To me, if a president tried to disable the best diplomacy system, it would be the end of his presidency. Bush had done it in his last term. I thought it was the moment Americans should wake up and stop putting their heads in their pants. Obviously, I was wrong; he won the second term. The whole night I had my TV on and was praying for his loss. Too bad too many idiotic people in the mid-western states.danyet wrote:Bush's biggest problem is himself and the way he is unable to keep that silly grin off his face when delivering a perfectly good idea. He is not a leader, I'll admit but neither was John Kerry.
- Danyet
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 2:29 am
- Status: Teacher of English
- Location: USA
It's a "guy thing". A real man, such as say....me, can tell these things.LennyeTran wrote:How can you assure that Kerry wouldn't be a better man than Bush for the position?danyet wrote:Bush's biggest problem is himself and the way he is unable to keep that silly grin off his face when delivering a perfectly good idea. He is not a leader, I'll admit but neither was John Kerry.
-
- Member
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 1:06 pm
- Location: CHINA
bush...so badly....actually he didn't any power to become a president...he's the worse president in the americans ....sometime I hard to know why american' s people would choose him ....I don't know if right or wrong for americans...Shazzam wrote:I really don't believe the BUSH is a racist! I don't believe that he sat back and did nothing in the hope that black-americans would die. I just think he has poor organisational skills and makes bad choices. I mean lets face it the guy can hardly string a sentence together without help. :(
- MissLT
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 2530
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
- Status: Other
- MissLT
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 2530
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
- Status: Other
Why Jessica Simpson? It's because she loves Bush, but she's officially turned down his invitation to the White House???danyet wrote:I think should have Jessica Simson for president .......and Britany Spears for vice P. ..........They're both a couple of airheads!
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/03/ ... 9127.shtml
Why Britney? It's because she always shows her stomach even when she's pregnant or not? And right now she's pregnant again...
- MissLT
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 2530
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
- Status: Other
Yeah, she is again with that useless husband of her. Actually, not husband since they're separating. I don't understand why she spent money to fix her bosom and not her brain.Dixie wrote:Really?LennyeTran wrote: Why Britney? It's because she always shows her stomach even when she's pregnant or not? And right now she's pregnant again...