Page 1 of 2

Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:54 pm
by vince90
I like him because he isn’t a liberal, he is a true terrorist fighter and he talks what he means. What I don’t like him because he does not have ability to resolve the issue quick enough, not withdraw troops after WMD investigating ended and he does not have a clear plan what he is doing. Yeah! It’s worse when he speaks in public. :D

Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 4:49 pm
by essie
In todays society, it doesn't matter who you vote for. If the governing people (the deadly rich) need someone like Bush they'll make it so, if they needed Al Gore then he would have been president. There's no good and bad for them, it's all about who can help them get what they need.

I have faith that this will change one day...

Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 5:22 pm
by MissLT
It's all about who's better at lying in this whole game. I guess baby Bush won that lying competition fair and square. My gramma and mother believed in him, for crying out loud :roll: .

Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 5:30 pm
by zaman
i'm so bored froml your response LennyeTran

Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:01 pm
by MissLT
zaman wrote:i'm so bored froml your response LennyeTran
You're welcome! Since I'm giving credits to Muslims like you who say they believe in peace I'm taking this talk as a thank you.

Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:13 pm
by Admiral
It's all about religion and history.

The early spanish settlers of the "American" continent had to settle the whole continent. Through the adventure in combating Indians AND in making a wilderness into a civilised village, the American value came up. Then the settlers weren't spanish any more, but American. That's why Americans like to combat, it's already in the history.

And how did the spanish come on the idea to settle a whole continent? Because the early spanish settlers were very catholic. (We learned in school that Catholic religion demands a lot of self-will and solving problems by their own) To my mind that's why they succeeded in populating a whole continent.

And now many Americans still have that feeling to do everything by their own, and to fight the ones who challenges them.

Religion amd history, used as reasons for war, are the real causes of war. Religion should be modernised, and history should be seen as something which is over.

Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 11:55 pm
by Danyet
Wrong again!!
The Spanish did not settle the whole continent. They settled only the south west part of America and even then their supply lines were stretched.

Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 12:03 am
by Rach
Yeah, it really is a strange thing in the history of the catholicism, this awful attitude everyone who believes in something else is "barbarian" and has to be "evangelized". Just awful.. But I don't think it's a matter of a specific religion, this way of thinking (our religion is the best, our way of living is the best, and everyone should live like we do!) can be found all over the world. Sadly enough...

Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 4:33 pm
by zaman
yes i do not believe in the peace with hypocrite people i am just believe in it with people faithfuls.

Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 10:57 pm
by MissLT
Define "hypocrite"!!!!!!! :roll:

Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 11:19 pm
by Shazzam
LennyeTran wrote:Define "hypocrite"!!!!!!! :roll:
Yeh me too; I can't understand that last post at all. :roll: I mean people of faithful Hope you get an answer Lenny then I might be able to work it out too! :?

Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 4:33 am
by jeffcox
essie, I love your style, yeah!

You say so much and yet you say nothing.

Cool, really!

You're angry, but you're not really angry!

You're a hypocrite, but then again, you're not!

Provoke by shock, it works, but then again, it doesn't.

You're really F****ed up, but then again, you make total sense!

In other words, you're just like the vast majority of people. The problem is... you know it!

You come over as a fanatic... and all your shock and f***ing just don't work.

What do you want of us? Don't say "nothing" because you're here of your own accord. Do you really know? Are you brave enough to reaveal it?

And that's the question!

Why are you here?
Is it worth it?
To be or not to be?

Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 4:38 am
by MissLT
jeffcox wrote:
You're a hypocrite, but then again, you're not!
:lol: :lol: :lol: I wonder how he takes it!

Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 6:02 am
by jeffcox
Ah, he'll probably love it or hate it, or neither!

Is he here to shock... or provoke... or let off steam... does he know he's here... does he know where 'here' is... and does he even care?

All these questions and more will be answered in the next episode of SOAP... a little crushing music, if you please, maestro.

Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 6:17 am
by MissLT
I don't believe he's that deep. Don't overestimate him! :twisted:

Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 2:01 pm
by zaman
so you want from me to define hypocrite ,for example HYPOCRITE the person who pretending he loves children and hate anyone bit them and on the other hand like the country it is do that , as some people here in this forum

Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 4:26 am
by jeffcox
Hi Zaman.

Could you explain this part of your sentence. I couldn't quite understand it.

"...hate anyone bit them and on the other hand like the country it is do that..."

Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 3:42 pm
by zaman
with all my pleasure :
yes you are right i did a mistake thanks for you to observe that .
on the other hand i mean person who hate children and deleterious them and in the same time fight anyone do that, do you get the point?

Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 2:54 pm
by martinyao
essie wrote:But f*** Buddhism to.
wow~good dick, can ~ anything...