Discussions about policy and worldly news should be objective, so I'm not arguing with you, I hope you could get it.
This is what you wrote,
Admiral wrote: 3 Danyet is American = 4 Danyet supports at least one terrorist.
The reason why I jumped into this topic because of this. You insulted not only him (your business with him), but you also insulted ALL Americans who didn't vote and support Bush, which meant you insulted ME, a Vietnamese-American who did not vote nor support him along with that group.
You replied to Danyet as a personal attack, using his own way to "work" on him. In fact, this is what you said in your other post. Is this "objective" to you to generalize like this? I guess this is your definition of objective.
Admiral wrote:And do you always stick to the topic? Don't come with rules like "stick to the topic", do you stick to the topic?
No, I don't, but I try my best in Current News. I don't try to generalize or give biased information like "Japanese Buddhist soldiers died for their religion in WWII"
Ha, still laughing at this!
Admiral wrote:Sometimes you bully other members, and last time you mentioned Redrose, maybe that should be an attack to me...
Yes, it was. I do not like you.
You think someone bullies another because you, like many others, hate to be corrected. I correct people; I don't bully.
You were asking ME
See above, I don't have time fooling around with you, I speak to everybody who reads this thread. I hope it's clear now.
Admiral wrote:Let's imagine a society like esl club. If somebody goes and spreads anger through the whole society, like what danyet does, don't you want him to stop? If yes, don't you want to tell him what is true?
The post was directly for me, but the "YOU" was to everyone. Should I teach you to write as well?
You CAN'T get your sources correct or stay with the topic to persuade others to believe you. Not only that you tried to changed history with your biased personal opinion article that some lame person wrote it. Then you expect me to believe it.
Of course I can get my sources correct. I always post the German article on which my post is based on at the beginning of political discussions.
You mean all Muslims? Of course, you guys love to hang people who talk about your prophet. What else is new?
Mr.Love means all esl club users. Is Mr.Love a muslim?
Sure, he's not. When did you change your faith, Mr_Love? How come this kid didn't know you were a Muslim?
Admiral wrote:Listen, we are not racist. I hope you are not racist, too. Why not thinking about it: Do you really want to become racist only because your boyfriend is racist? You don't belong to him.
I doubt your definition of racism; therefore, I'm not gonna waste my time to defend to a person who thinks it's not an attack or childish to call Danyet my "boyfriend" or "cute boyfriend" in his every post.