"Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Monthly topics for discussion

Moderators: Vega, Krisi, TalkingPoint

kalery
New Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 3:46 am
Location: China

Post by kalery » Thu Apr 13, 2006 4:40 am

Why do such couple must face to the problem of children?They can live together without a child.I think Their life style may be harmful to a child. When the child grow up,he(she)may also be a Gay or a Les.

gjsgjs
New Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 3:35 pm
Location: midwest

Post by gjsgjs » Thu Apr 13, 2006 3:51 pm

maybe in thinking about this question, it is helpful to think: can you imagine being told, you could never find someone to love for some reason: that, you have to live alone your whole life? Or for that matter, that, yes, you can Never Ever have sex? It is very human to want to be with someone else. And, not all couples have children. Not all couples with children take care of them. Some things, people have to decide, and some things they need other people to stand up for them. There was a time, when slavery was how people believed. There is still slavery, but now usually, it is considered unjust to treat people this way. Should people be persecuted for wanting affection and companionship?

gjsgjs
New Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 3:35 pm
Location: midwest

two moms

Post by gjsgjs » Thu Apr 13, 2006 4:01 pm

I forgot to say, my best friend had Two Moms. He now has three children, two girls from his wife's other marriage which the man was very mean to her, and a son from his wife, and he is a very very good father.

User avatar
MissLT
Ethereal Member
Posts: 3925
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
Status: Other

Post by MissLT » Wed Apr 26, 2006 1:02 am

cmcole wrote: This is so succinctly put, and sweet in its simplicity. 8)

As Lennye Tran has been saying throughout this discussion, as have others, we as humans want to label everything, and this can divide and separate us into limited beings, not allowing us to reach our full potential because we might believe these labels. One example is here in Thailand where people believe that if they have dark skin they are ugly and not accepted by society. They even air commericals having people get embarrassed because their skin is too dark. The result is that kids ride/walk around in 35 degree heat covered from head to toe because they are afraid they will get dark. They would rather have a heat stroke then to have people make fun of them or think they are peasants.
I know exactly what you're talking about. And the bold is so true.

cmcole wrote:So in closing my 2 baht worth of thoughts,
LOL you're funny.
cmcole wrote: Love knows no boundaries! Only adult humans make them! Even children do not see them until adults teach them how to see prejudice. We as teachers have an obligation to teach all aspects and then let our students make up their own minds. Afterall, they really are our future, and they aren't stupid.
Exactly. Small children are free of prejudice, discrimination, stereotypes and all sorts of ~. Unfortunately, they'll pick the ideas up from the grownups as they grow older.

User avatar
zaman
Gold Member
Posts: 201
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 11:20 am
Status: Other
Location: libya
Contact:

Post by zaman » Wed May 03, 2006 4:59 pm

in my opinion i am still contend all what did you say it is folish we are human not animal to something such that .

User avatar
Dixie
Miss EnglishClub.com 2006
Miss EnglishClub.com 2006
Posts: 6341
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 2:08 pm
Status: English Teacher
Location: Catalunya

Post by Dixie » Wed May 03, 2006 8:19 pm

cmcole wrote: So in closing my 2 baht worth of thoughts, Love knows no boundaries! Only adult humans make them! Even children do not see them until adults teach them how to see prejudice. We as teachers have an obligation to teach all aspects and then let our students make up their own minds. Afterall, they really are our future, and they aren't stupid.
100% agree :!: I loved that.

tikay
Gold Member
Posts: 448
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: Lancaster, CA. U.S.

Post by tikay » Wed May 03, 2006 8:26 pm

IMHO WE ARE HUMAN/ANIMAL...depends upon the actions which catagory you fit best within.
For instance:
Serial murderer=Animal
Concious Person=Human

this is what i see :)

tikay
Gold Member
Posts: 448
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: Lancaster, CA. U.S.

Post by tikay » Thu May 04, 2006 10:10 am

WOW I was just reading about marriage last night and i have something to input to you dear new member...
This is a book i have studied for a long time that i was reading and it was brought to my attention again most recently:
Paper 82
The evolution of marriage.
Marriage - mating - grows out of bisexuality. Marriage is man's reactional adjustment to such bisexuality, while the family life is the sum total resulting from all such evolutionary and adaptative adjustments. Marriage is enduring; it is not inherent in biologic evolution, but it is the basis of all social evolution, and is therefore certain of continued existance in some form. Marriage has given mankind the home, and the home is the crowning glory of the whole long and arduous evolutionary struggle.
While religious, social and educational institutions are all essential to the survival of the cultural civilization, the family is the master civilizer. A child learns most of the essentials of his life from his family and the neighbors.
The humans of olden times did not possess a very rich social civilization but such as they had they faithfully and effectively passed on to the next generation. And you should recognise that most of these civilazations of the past continued to evolve with a bare minimum of institutional influences because the home was effectively functioning. Today the human races posess a rich social, and cultural heritage and it should be wisely and effectively passed on to succeeding generations. The family as an educational institution must be maintained.

Now this is just the beginning of a long a windy trail of thought on the institution of marriage so i will leave this for all to ponder and i am off to sleep... for I have stayed up long past my normal, early 12 or 1 o' clock bedtime.
Be well and if you like that check out: The Urantia Book, sometimes, perhaps. This book, it is amazing to me.
nighty night :wink:
shoulders are crying...

User avatar
samento
Member
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 1:02 am
Location: Thailand

Post by samento » Wed May 10, 2006 5:36 am

In my opinion, I think what are the effects of this. What is the word we should think seriously. Becuase if we think about moral or religious, represent "what," our view or answer is based on our religious and may be not accept this idea. And we can go beyond this what. But if we think about freedom or human right, our answer is yes. We should legislate for this marriage, for these people. After we think of "what" in vary aspects, then we will consider whether this marriage is suitable.
Do you agree with me? If it's not necessary to have only one answer, the answer's always yes for the question (I mean it should "marriages" between people of the same sex be permitted.)
So I agree that it should have the law for this marriage. Even though I have many disageement.

PARTYLAND
New Member
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 12:09 pm
Location: PARTYLAND

Post by PARTYLAND » Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:50 pm

my standpoint is person have the right to be a gay,for law,it should not be prohibited,and should not be permit legally

User avatar
zaman
Gold Member
Posts: 201
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 11:20 am
Status: Other
Location: libya
Contact:

Post by zaman » Tue Jul 04, 2006 10:46 am

hello friends
until now I can insisting my opinion it is forbidden ,if anyone read any holys books he will find this easily , anyhow i am really happy cause in my country that is unlegal, I thank
ALLAh for that .

TURKOGLU
New Member
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 8:44 am
Location: TURKIYE//Istanbul

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by TURKOGLU » Fri Jul 14, 2006 8:51 am

TP wrote:Should "marriages" between people of the same sex be permitted?
To me, it must not be allowed as some of the friends in the thread have mentioned the reasons..and in a simple way I want to take the mathematical concern into consideration and the world consists of male and female ones in more or less equal rates so the order is or must be our priority and for the sake of the order of the world it sould not be allowed..as also it can create a potential homosexual population in the world especially among the youngs and teen as they have tendency to any interesting or eccentric phenomena..

for now these are sufficent I think..

meo
Member
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 7:32 am
Location: china

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by meo » Sun Aug 20, 2006 6:10 am

my god ,what are you talking about?

User avatar
Nawas
Member
Posts: 21
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:05 pm

Post by Nawas » Sun Aug 20, 2006 8:30 pm

The god distingush the people from another creature by brain and we by thinking in the marriage between the same sex should be legal,we will be less than animal.
ask your self what is the results of this weird marriage???
Is it healthy and ethical??
In my opinion it is very dirty things.

User avatar
MissLT
Ethereal Member
Posts: 3925
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
Status: Other

Post by MissLT » Mon Aug 21, 2006 5:25 am

Nawas wrote:The god distingush the people from another creature by brain and we by thinking in the marriage between the same sex should be legal,we will be less than animal.
ask your self what is the results of this weird marriage???
Is it healthy and ethical??
In my opinion it is very dirty things.
Are you saying that animals have no brain? And humans are not animals?

Jaime
Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 8:01 am
Location: Spain
Contact:

Post by Jaime » Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:47 am

Nawas wrote:The god distingush the people from another creature by brain and we by thinking in the marriage between the same sex should be legal,we will be less than animal.
ask your self what is the results of this weird marriage???
Is it healthy and ethical??
In my opinion it is very dirty things.
One of the differences between "people" and "animals" is that "animals" don't know what "dirty" really means. And when you say "less than animal" I found you quite offensive. By the way, have you ever been into an orgy making love with women and men all mixed together. Me neither, but I think it more "human" than just having intercourse to procreate, like every "animal" always does.

GJG
Member
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 12:05 am
Location: Shanghai, China

Post by GJG » Sun Sep 03, 2006 5:10 am

it is not acceptable, otherwise, there will be no more human being.
some people want to do it, that is ok, but I believe most people do not like it. :evil:

jeffcox
Gold Member
Posts: 411
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 4:54 am
Location: England - Brazil

Post by jeffcox » Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:58 pm

I have some gay friends. They are more 'human' than the majority of heterosexuals I've met. They make better friends, are more sensitive, more critical thinking, more tollerant to differences and therefore have less -isms, and they are really happy people. This is what I have noticed.

Marriage is a social concept and homosexuality has existed since the beginning of humanity. Such activity in animals shows that it is a natural phenomenon and not social. This means, to me, that most people who are against such same-sex marriages are unable to see beyond their own social or religious education and prejudices to see what is more 'human'. Try reading the Cavern metaphor by Plato.

What exactly is a marriage? A union between a man and a woman? If that is all it is, there is no need to get married, just live together. Is it a promise between two people to live together in love and respect? If so, then two people can do that, whatever their sexual preference.

For me, marriage is a state of harmony between two people; full of love, respect, understanding and tollerance. I find that homosexuals usually have these qualities in abundance.

User avatar
mali
Gold Member
Posts: 116
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 10:03 am
Location: Pakistan
Contact:

Post by mali » Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:29 pm

It is not good because marriage is the other topic you can not say these type of sex marriage
HI, I AM M. ALI, 30 YEARS OLD, HOLDING MASTER AND LLB DEGREE, WORKING AN INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, VISITED AROUND 25 COUNTRIES. LOOKING GOOD FRIEND

snowecho
Member
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 6:32 am

Post by snowecho » Wed Sep 20, 2006 11:45 am

oh no.It can't be legal. if two girls married there are too many boys will be single

User avatar
mali
Gold Member
Posts: 116
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 10:03 am
Location: Pakistan
Contact:

Post by mali » Wed Sep 20, 2006 12:01 pm

snowecho wrote:oh no.It can't be legal. if two girls married there are too many boys will be single
correct
HI, I AM M. ALI, 30 YEARS OLD, HOLDING MASTER AND LLB DEGREE, WORKING AN INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, VISITED AROUND 25 COUNTRIES. LOOKING GOOD FRIEND

Rach
Silver Member
Posts: 81
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Switzerland

Post by Rach » Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:35 pm

GJG wrote:it is not acceptable, otherwise, there will be no more human being.
There are actually over 6 billion human beings on this planet, the possibility of extinction because of homosexuality is most unlikely.

Marriage probably means to a lot of people something completely different, in my country a lot of young couples don't want to get married because it means nothing to them. They say, they don't need any religious nor governmental approvement for their love. It's their decision to live like that.

On the other hand, for a lot of other people marriage is a very precious thing which they want to share with that special someone they love. It's their decision, too, and isn't it kind of a natural human right to live the way we want to live? How can any state or religion dare to say what person we should love and how we should pass our lifes together with them? It's the private issue of two human beings which way of living they choose for themselves.

tmnscc
New Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 8:14 am
Location: vietnam

Post by tmnscc » Thu Sep 28, 2006 9:01 am

In my opinion,it should be permited because Law and we can not ban ''Love''. We usually say that '' love is no frontier''. So I think it is no sex discrimination in love. The Law can ban ''marriage'' but ''love'' between sex diffrences, therefore no need to ban. All gays have right to enjoy their owned happiness by get married with their lover. We will be selfish if approving any law on ban. We can not ban only because we have our owned husbands who are sex different. Please put yourself under their situation. We also can not accept or agree a marriage with a partner who we don't love and can live with them in the remaining life.

User avatar
Alfabeto
Member
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 10:58 am
Location: Spain

Post by Alfabeto » Wed Oct 25, 2006 9:59 am

First, marriage is not "natural", it is cultural. Animals don't get married. We are a special kind of animal because there is no "human nature" apart from culture and history. The problem is that there have been many ideas in different cultures about what marriage is for or should be for. In some cultures polygamy is OK. In others it is an abomination. The reasons for marrying another person have also changed over the centuries and vary across cultural boundaries. So nobody can say that one type of marriage is or has always been "the natural one". So far I agree with the people who have defended same-sex marriage. Their position is logically consistent, I will not deny that.
However...(here comes the other side)I think the laws of a country should be inspired by prudence rather than logic. And for many reasons I think it is not prudent to legislate more than one family model per society (homosexual marriages want to be regarded as families, not just marriages). I am not against giving same sex couples some rights, but equating them with heterosexual families is, IMHO, a mistake. In my country gay marriages have recently been legalized. It all seemed very logical at first, but now a same sex couple has filed a complaint because current laws only permit one of them to be a biological parent, and they want both to be recognized as biological parents, which is absurd. So it all starts out very logically but we end up with absurd situations.

juanalex
Member
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 10:13 pm

Get rid of the word "marriage"

Post by juanalex » Wed Dec 06, 2006 9:11 pm

Call them civil unions instead. Whether it is a man and a woman or 2 men or 2 women. Make things level. :lol:

wllsp
Gold Member
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 7:54 am
Location: Russia, Saint-Petersburg

Post by wllsp » Fri Dec 08, 2006 7:37 pm

Should marriages between people of the same sex be permitted?

OK, let's think. Wow, it seems that we already have sort of unions between people of the same sex. So the bottom line is that we have a wrong question. We can't permit or not permit one adult person to live and to have sex with another adult person. It's their private live, not a crime (however the same sex marriage was even prosecuted in the USSR).

So the real question is whether to acknowledge this sort of unions as legal. A few countries have alreasy admitted this type of marriages. I think that in the USA it's going to be legal in future (if I'm wrong correct me, please). It seems like a crazy idea to many Amercan people right now but it's going to be perceived differently. For example, slavery was a nutural thing in the USA back in eighteenth century, but right now it's illegal. So it's just a shift in how our mind that is required.

And finally just one more point. I want to underline that if it is legal it's not going to change our sexual preferences. It's very important. A man who is sexually aroused wnen he sees a naked woman will not feel the same towards another naked man even if the same sex unions are legal. Our own sexuality dictates that we do, not laws.

cuongviet
Member
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 4:49 pm
Location: vietnam

Post by cuongviet » Sat Dec 09, 2006 6:42 am

I agree with many people in the forum. It should be legal. They still live together whether the goverment allow it or not. Why don't give them oppotunities to be recognised by society. :?:

wllsp
Gold Member
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 7:54 am
Location: Russia, Saint-Petersburg

Post by wllsp » Mon Dec 11, 2006 4:21 pm

I just want to add couple more points to my post.

Well, there are some issues related to this questions that aren't quite obvious and some which are more or less simple.

A simple thing is rights on real estate. If a same sex couple have bought a property together they must have the same rights on this property as an ordinary couple has. I'm talking abount inheriting it and so on.

A quite complicated issue is the right to adopt children who live without parents. Personally, I'm not sure that it is a good idea to let them do this.

So probably there might be some restrictions with regard to the rights of the same sex couples. However some legal rights have to be granted them.

juanalex
Member
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 10:13 pm

Adoptive gay parents as opposed to what?

Post by juanalex » Mon Dec 11, 2006 4:56 pm

Foster homes orphanages? I say if children don´t have a good home and there are gay parents looking for children then by all means let them adopt. There have been studies done that prove that gay parents are just as capable as a a hetero couple. There are too many children on the streets with nothing specially here in Mexico.

wllsp
Gold Member
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 7:54 am
Location: Russia, Saint-Petersburg

Re: Adoptive gay parents as opposed to what?

Post by wllsp » Tue Dec 12, 2006 8:35 am

juanalex wrote:There have been studies done that prove that gay parents are just as capable as a a hetero couple.
I wonder if you could provide me with some links? And I wanna be sure these reports have not been sponsored by gay organizations.
juanalex wrote: There are too many children on the streets with nothing specially here in Mexico.
Look, it's likely to be OK in Mexico, but it might be a complicated issue in some other contries due to religion and current attitude in a society towards gays. Besides, as far as understand there is no extensive experience with regard to upbringing children in this sort of families. Am I right? At least, in Russia it's very uncommon to see it.

Finally, my point was not specifically about upbringing children by gays. It was broader. I was talking about a set of difficult problems that might or might not arise from legal acknoledging gay marriages.

vahid
New Member
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 2:07 pm
Location: Iran

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by vahid » Tue Dec 19, 2006 1:28 pm

hello everybody :
In my opinion this question has been answered before . if you look at animate (live stocke)in the whole world you will see just two different sex (which are opposite). what do you undrestant of this creation ? if we could marry with the same sex then god wouldnot create two genders . would he ?

waleed
New Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 9:52 am
Location: sudan
Contact:

Post by waleed » Thu Dec 28, 2006 8:07 am

ahmedtaha wrote:of coursre not ,in my own point of view i think the marrige concept is much bigger than just making sex , letus ask why people married? the answer would be :-
firstly : to reserve the humanity this a bilogical answer
secondy : to make sex
may be there is another answers but the logical question will be : what life going to be if every body married from his/her sex??
ur tottatly right about this marrige not meaning only having a sex ,

User avatar
crystalfrogw
Member
Posts: 23
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 1:30 pm
Location: Tianjin,China

Post by crystalfrogw » Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:55 am

I don't understand why people of same sex love each other but i agree people should make their own choices. so if the homosexual people don't influence my life why should i mind?

javzm
Silver Member
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 8:13 pm
Location: Costa Rica

Post by javzm » Tue May 22, 2007 5:31 am

Well to be honest I don´t like it, and in my opinion it is not correct, it is not how nature was create. Men are ment to be with women, but well everyone is free to do what they want to do and make any decision they want to make. :D

I would just want to ask something to the gay people, well, gay men people, How is it that with the amount of pretty ladies that we have all around the world they preffer to be with a men????? :shock:

User avatar
Bambang
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1930
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 3:26 am
Location: Jakarta Indonesia

Post by Bambang » Tue May 29, 2007 4:41 am

javzm wrote:Well to be honest I don´t like it, and in my opinion it is not correct, it is not how nature was create. Men are ment to be with women, but well everyone is free to do what they want to do and make any decision they want to make. :D

I would just want to ask something to the gay people, well, gay men people, How is it that with the amount of pretty ladies that we have all around the world they preffer to be with a men????? :shock:

People can do anything what they wanna do.
But... doesnt mean they can break the law of nature.
Men for women, not for men or for animals.
It goes against the nature of human being.

javzm
Silver Member
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 8:13 pm
Location: Costa Rica

Post by javzm » Sat Jun 02, 2007 6:04 am

I completly agree with you. You could not have said it better. Is the law of nature, men for women and no for men or animals (bisversa).

ahmedxzxz
Silver Member
Posts: 50
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 7:03 pm
Location: Anywhere

May be

Post by ahmedxzxz » Sat Jun 02, 2007 8:34 pm

I think that marriage is something that forms a relation between a man and a woman in a legal way that is acceptable by all regardless of race or sex.

User avatar
Dixie
Miss EnglishClub.com 2006
Miss EnglishClub.com 2006
Posts: 6341
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 2:08 pm
Status: English Teacher
Location: Catalunya

Re: May be

Post by Dixie » Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:21 am

ahmedxzxz wrote:I think that marriage is something that forms a relation between a man and a woman in a legal way that is acceptable by all regardless of race or sex.
Sorry this statement is ambiguous :?

ahmedxzxz
Silver Member
Posts: 50
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 7:03 pm
Location: Anywhere

Post by ahmedxzxz » Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:02 pm

I mean that marriage is only between a male and a female according to their religions and talking about same sex(man to man)or(woman to woman)is totally a wrong behaviour .And is not accepted at all.We also have other backgrounds on who follow this and why?...It's a hard subject and I cannot imagine how those persons act in that way....

User avatar
Bambang
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1930
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 3:26 am
Location: Jakarta Indonesia

Post by Bambang » Mon Jun 04, 2007 1:55 pm

I just wanna give a concrete suggestion to all gays all over this planet.

Nobody was born as a gay.
Everybody was born either as a boy or a girl.
Then their parents named them in line with their genital. A male name for a boy babyborn and a female name for a girl babyborn. No name for a gay babyborn, because of course nobody was born as a gay.

In my opinion, there are two main factors that make somebody become a gay.

First, the environment.
Second, their choice.

Let's discuss the first main factor, the environment.
Environment has strong influence in somebody's life.
Environment can make somebody become either good or bad. It also can make somebody become a gay or not. The environment that I mean is the environment in wider scoop, including family, neighbours, friends and society. Because environment can make somebody become a gay, then it can also make somebody not become a gay.

So in short, to avoid us become a gay, just select our environment especially friends and society that we are interacting and socializing with.

Now, let's move on to the second one, the choice.
To be a gay is a choice. Not to be a gay is a choice too.
It's not a destiny. We can choose it and we can also control our choice. You can choose to be a gay or to be a normal person. So why not choose to be a normal one.

Being a gay is a choice. it's a basic human right to choose anything they want. But unfortunately, the choice to be a gay is wrong, and it absolutely goes against human nature, goes against the law of nature. What will happen in the future if men are married to men and women are married to women. What will happen to the family institution? What will happen to the society? And what will happen to the world? The answer is simple and clear, DISASTER !!! :evil: :cry:

javzm
Silver Member
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 8:13 pm
Location: Costa Rica

Post by javzm » Tue Jun 05, 2007 3:32 pm

I do agree with you, the envirment have a huge influence in how a person is going to behave and to what is that person going to react.
I would said that I don´t agree with you on the parts of the choice. Sometime is not even the person choice, what would happened if you are 4 or 5 years old and you play with your friend games that are not normal. That child will grow with that image and you know that our psycological part of the child will play a big part in his/her life. So, I would said that it is not always people choice. I am not sure if i explain my self well.

User avatar
Bambang
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1930
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 3:26 am
Location: Jakarta Indonesia

Post by Bambang » Fri Jun 08, 2007 2:05 pm

Environment has a very strong influence to someone. But when they are grown up, brain is very important. I mean when we are grown up enough, we can use our brain to select if something is right or wrong. We can choose to do right or wrong doings. So finally, it's up to the person to choose what he wants to do or what he wants to be. So buddy, please use your smart brain not to choose yourself to be a gay. Because if you ask your brain whether it is good or not to be a gay, then the brain will answer NO. It's no good at all.

User avatar
Snowy*
Silver Member
Posts: 81
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:18 am

Post by Snowy* » Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:51 am

Hi every body

I can't imagine that!!
Can any body imagine that??????
I feel so disgusting when I hear about that...


It's really a stupid Question..
But you are very smart!!
You know that subject will attract everybody...


:wink:

mita
New Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 4:49 am
Location: viet nam

Post by mita » Wed Jun 27, 2007 5:25 am

i think people live in the world just want to be happy, if they think they marry with their same sex it's make them happy, so why we judge their action. this case is just minority, the mass of people want to marry with their contrary sex, it's instinct

User avatar
Bambang
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1930
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 3:26 am
Location: Jakarta Indonesia

Post by Bambang » Sat Jun 30, 2007 4:00 pm

mita wrote:i think people live in the world just want to be happy, if they think they marry with their same sex it's make them happy, so why we judge their action.
My friend, life is choices. You are right buddy.
To live happily is a choice. To live unhappily is a choice too. Being a gay is a choice and not being a gay is also a choice. The question is which choice is better.

To me, there are some criteria to determine whether a choice is good or not.

First. It doesn't go against our religions.
As far as I know, no religions in this planet that allow its people to get married to the same sex. So, getting married to the same sex is not allowed by all religions.

Second. It doesn't go against the law of nature.
Getting married to the same sex is against the law of nature. Because naturally, men get married to women, women get married to men. Even animals which have no good brain as human beings never "marry" their same sex. He animals have intercourse with she animals. They never make a single mistake on this. They know exactly that he with she. There is no he with he in their dictionary. :cry:

nightwish
Silver Member
Posts: 62
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 11:00 am
Location: Venus

Post by nightwish » Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:21 am

We all know that this thing is not normal in our societies and not legal, but everyone of us have the choice to live his/her life as he/she wants it to be, and to do what he/she thinks that makes him/her happy and content, but not to forget that everything have limits and in order not to hurt other people.
As I can see by doing this thing no one get hurt, and it's not that big deal or problem.
So I'm not against this thing.

User avatar
Krisi
Keeper of the Board
Keeper of the Board
Posts: 4133
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 9:48 am
Status: English Learner

Post by Krisi » Fri Jul 20, 2007 2:15 pm

:arrow: It's there life. :wink:

User avatar
Bambang
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1930
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 3:26 am
Location: Jakarta Indonesia

Post by Bambang » Fri Jul 20, 2007 3:23 pm

nightwish wrote:We all know that this thing is not normal in our societies and not legal, but everyone of us have the choice to live his/her life as he/she wants it to be, and to do what he/she thinks that makes him/her happy and content, but not to forget that everything have limits and in order not to hurt other people.
As I can see by doing this thing no one get hurt, and it's not that big deal or problem.
So I'm not against this thing.
krisi wrote:It's there life.
Supernaturally speaking, dear Nightwise and Krisi could get married.

Uncle Bambang supports that idea !

User avatar
Krisi
Keeper of the Board
Keeper of the Board
Posts: 4133
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 9:48 am
Status: English Learner

Post by Krisi » Sun Jul 22, 2007 5:10 am

:D :arrow: Honestly, this is comical. But it's their life we're out of this.

maksoora
Silver Member
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 1:52 pm
Location: Dubai
Contact:

Must U look to the problem

Post by maksoora » Thu Aug 02, 2007 2:24 pm

Should "marriages" between people of the same sex be permitted
I think this is madness . really it is not freedom as some said. I wonder who these people love the same sex. I believe the truth loved between two different sex. i consider such situation as a problem must all world take action coz they corrupt the legal rule.
as all said am against marrgies of the same sex

while am reading this subject raised question in my mind which is what is the main problem of marriages of the same sex?I hope all look to the problem
Thank u

User avatar
Bambang
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1930
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 3:26 am
Location: Jakarta Indonesia

This is also our problem.

Post by Bambang » Fri Aug 03, 2007 3:44 pm

krisi wrote::D :arrow: Honestly, this is comical. But it's their life we're out of this.
Dear Krisi,

We're not out of this.

This is also our problem.

What would happen if 50 % of this world population got married to the same sex?

What a mess :!:

nightwish
Silver Member
Posts: 62
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 11:00 am
Location: Venus

Post by nightwish » Sat Aug 04, 2007 11:23 am

What a mess :!:
what kind of a mess?...

it might sounds like an unusul or an extraordinary thing. But, we can't change anyone's conceptions and perspectives, just by saying: "this thing that you do is wrong, and an illegal thing". Briefly, we can't prevent him/her of doing what makes him/her feel happy. In the end, its his/her own life we can disagree with him/her but we can't just come and prevent him/her of doing such a thing.

that's my opinion :!:

User avatar
Bambang
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1930
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 3:26 am
Location: Jakarta Indonesia

We need balances

Post by Bambang » Sat Aug 04, 2007 1:12 pm

"Keep your balance or you'll fall"

Moody
Silver Member
Posts: 54
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 11:41 am
Contact:

Post by Moody » Mon Aug 06, 2007 8:34 am

First of all we need to see that word,"marriage" or "marry" originates from where? It originate from religion. And all religions unanomously describes it as spirtual binding between man and women only. And all Abrahimic religions disapprove gay or lesbian relationships or binding. So, if somebody wants to bind them self in the same sex relationship, then WHY insist on word marriage (or in other words seek religious approval)??? If you can choose to live your way, then why ask religions to change their meanings or ways according to your rules! If you have the legal right, YOU CAN MAKE A CHOICE, BUT IT DOESN'T MEAN THAT THE RELIGIONS ARE ALSO LEGALLY BOUND TO CHANGE THEIR MEANINGS TOO!!

lady
Member
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 10:48 am

Post by lady » Wed Aug 15, 2007 11:05 am

in my opinion think it different namely this exchangeable according to people[/u][/i]

Moody
Silver Member
Posts: 54
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 11:41 am
Contact:

Post by Moody » Sat Sep 08, 2007 3:09 pm

lady wrote:in my opinion think it different namely this exchangeable according to people[/u][/i]
What do you mean by that?
Are you asking, to read the minds or to change the meaning of words?

I'm sorry but for me gay relation means going in toooo deeeep s.h.i.t....no offense but you know what I mean, I just can't imagine!!

User avatar
Alfabeto
Member
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 10:58 am
Location: Spain

Post by Alfabeto » Thu Nov 22, 2007 8:42 pm

"Same-sex marriage" is an oxymoron. It's impossible because the concept of marriage or "matrimony" (from Latin "mater" = mother)necessarily involves a man and a woman. It's possible however to create a similar institution just for gay people and call it something else.

quangson
Silver Member
Posts: 29
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 8:57 am
Location: Vietnam

Post by quangson » Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:46 am

i'm afraid of the gaymen

ANAS
Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 1:30 pm
Contact:

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by ANAS » Sun Dec 30, 2007 8:25 pm

in fact, this is nats.

I can't believe that happen in somewhere on the earth. As you know that is unusual and against the natural. The people who do it must treat him self form this ill before miss his life.

User avatar
MissLT
Ethereal Member
Posts: 3925
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
Status: Other

Re:

Post by MissLT » Mon Dec 31, 2007 3:49 am

[quote="Moody"]First of all we need to see that word,"marriage" or "marry" originates from where? It originate from religion. And all religions unanomously describes it as spirtual binding between man and women only. And all Abrahimic religions disapprove gay or lesbian relationships or binding. So, if somebody wants to bind them self in the same sex relationship, then WHY insist on word marriage (or in other words seek religious approval)??? If you can choose to live your way, then why ask religions to change their meanings or ways according to your rules! If you have the legal right, YOU CAN MAKE A CHOICE, BUT IT DOESN'T MEAN THAT THE RELIGIONS ARE ALSO LEGALLY BOUND TO CHANGE THEIR MEANINGS TOO!![/quote]


May I ask you what a religion usually teaches you? Does love, the basic and power of all things on earth, involve? Or is it merely a foundation that you can grab on to escape your fear of different beliefs? This world has so much hate because of fear of the unknowns. Life is too short to even love, so why must you spend your time to hate and forbid people to do things that bound to pure love?

User avatar
Bambang
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1930
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 3:26 am
Location: Jakarta Indonesia

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Bambang » Mon Dec 31, 2007 5:24 pm

The kids will say. "ME and my fathers will go for a swim tomorrow", or

A : "My moms asked me to go to school next year".
B: Which mom?
A: The one who has bigger butt.
B: Oh I see. My moms asked me to go to the ballet scholl next week.
A: Which mom?
B : The fussier one.

User avatar
MissLT
Ethereal Member
Posts: 3925
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
Status: Other

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by MissLT » Thu Jan 03, 2008 5:22 pm

[quote="Rasheed"]http://www.funnyjunkz.com/wp-content/up ... rriage.jpg

human of the same sex, animal, things…

what's more??!!!!!!!!!!!

My congratulations to them, their children will be very beautiful and happy, They should be proud of their father.

they terminate themselves step by step.

Praise and gratitude to Allah, we still normal people.[/quote]
Yeah, go ahead and pray. It's not like you don't, anyway, You pray for everything, so I don't see why this is an exception. And please, the next time you pray, ask your Allah to give you a heart also.

User avatar
Bambang
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1930
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 3:26 am
Location: Jakarta Indonesia

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Bambang » Fri Jan 04, 2008 10:25 am

[quote="LennyeTran"]
Yeah, go ahead and pray. It's not like you don't, anyway, You pray for everything, so I don't see why this is an exception. And please, the next time you pray, ask your Allah to give you a heart also.[/quote]

You are so beautiful, my lady. May I come to your house tonight? Please dress up first to welcome this old great man. Gimme your heart and welcome me with your big, best smiles.
Cya.

vince90
Gold Member
Posts: 378
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 8:31 pm

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by vince90 » Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:39 pm

[quote="Rasheed"][quote="LennyeTran"]please, the next time you pray, ask your Allah to give you a heart also.[/quote]

If my god will grant me a heart like yours (full of hating and lies), I don't want it.
I will ask him to convert me into a dog, this will be better to me and to this world, there is many people have hearts like your heart.[/quote]


Hey don’t throw your stinky puke to others. I have read your posts and they are full of hatred. Peace never comes until you’re ready to accept it man. Good luck!

User avatar
MissLT
Ethereal Member
Posts: 3925
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
Status: Other

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by MissLT » Fri Jan 04, 2008 5:37 pm

[quote="Rasheed"][quote="LennyeTran"]please, the next time you pray, ask your Allah to give you a heart also.[/quote]

If my god will grant me a heart like yours (full of hating and lies), I don't want it. [/quote]

You cannot have a heart like mine as long as you keep praying ten times a day or have your prejudice towards homosexuals. I never deny the fact that I do hate and lie. Nonetheless, there is one thing differentiates me from you is that I know in my heart my hatred and lies are wrong. I know I should not hate people because hate is a waste of emotion and time. And I know hate does not bring peace. Instead, I should focus on the beauties that lie in each person. Also, I know whatever reason I do my lying is still not acceptable.

What about you? Do you know in your heart that discriminating homosexuals is wrong?


[quote="Rasheed"]I will ask him to convert me into a dog, this will be better to me and to this world, [/quote]

Please do since considering the fact that there are dogs that do useful things to humanity. Guide dogs, rescue dogs, police dogs, and so on go out of their way to do wonderful to help humans. I don't see them praying daily to a religion that is supposed to teach others to love ALL beings, yet its followers tend to do otherwise. Also, I don't see them dogs have their prejudice towards homosexuals. They only go after criminals or people who intend to bring bad things to this world. Before wanting to be a dog, why don't you try to compare yourself to one? Have you done something like those dogs have? If not, please at least have an open-minded soul.


[quote="Rasheed"]there is many people have hearts like your heart.[/quote]
And how would the world turn out with people who had hearts like mine instead of yours? If you check history, it would definitely remind you what kinda hearts that wanted to killed others based on what they believed in. Go, please, go check. This is for your own good and other people who discriminate homosexuals also.

Don't ya'll sit in front of your computers and give me a load of b.s that you're not a hater and stuff; ya'll just disagree with the lifestyle homosexuals have. Why don't you try to substitute skin color for homosexuality and see what you'll get. It's the same as being racist when you're being hostile to homosexuals. Why don't you stop being a coward and admit that you're a hater and whatsoever. If you have the guts to do this, I'll shut my mouth. Otherwise, don't stink up EC with your ~, or I'll spit on it.

User avatar
MissLT
Ethereal Member
Posts: 3925
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
Status: Other

Re:

Post by MissLT » Fri Jan 04, 2008 5:46 pm

[quote="bambang"]
As far as I know, no religions in this planet that allow its people to get married to the same sex. So, [color=red][b]getting married to the same sex is not allowed by all religions[/b][/color].
[/quote]
Do your checking again before you wanted to use your absolute word, all.

User avatar
MissLT
Ethereal Member
Posts: 3925
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
Status: Other

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by MissLT » Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:23 pm

[quote="Rasheed"]

Are you angry little Vietnamese?
when you know what does mean "hate + lies"? , then you know why I respect dogs, And why I favorite to be a dog.

رحم الله من كتب : فضل الكلاب على كثير ممن لبس الثياب.
I can't translate into english.[/quote]
Is this all you can do, attack my ethnicity and give me something I don't understand? This is how you're taught to behave? I pity you and people like you. The next time someone gives you ~ about hating you as a Muslim or your ethnicity, don't forget that hate is reciprocity. There's no justice in hate. If you can think of homosexuals as abnormal people, then others have all their rights to dislike your belief or your skin.

User avatar
Bambang
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1930
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 3:26 am
Location: Jakarta Indonesia

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Bambang » Sat Jan 05, 2008 7:56 am

1. The quote icon is not working, why?

2. Don’t lie unless you want to poop or pee. Do everything including lying in this emergency situation. When “nature (poop and/ or pee)” calls, no one can hold or stop it.

3. Hate the behavior, not the people. Everybody was born innocent.

4. Let’s forget about dogs. I don’t even have one. Do you have any?

5. Lenny, does “b.s.” stand for “bull_shi_t”?

6. Lenny, don’t shut your mouth. Keep posting. We need you and your English skills.

7. “The next time someone gives you ~ … Lenny, what does “~” mean?

8. Here is a fresh joke about a gay’s dick.



Ten year old Timmy comes home from daycare and tells his mom that he thinks his babysitter is gay.

“Whatever makes you think THAT?!!?”, says mom.

Timmy replies, “Because his dick tasted like shi_t!”




9. Another one is about the possibility of homosexuality becomes compulsory someday if we don’t stop them spreading this social disease.


A long time resident of San Fransisco is packing all his stuff into boxes. His roommate comes in and asks what he’s doing. “I’m leaving!”, he replies. “They just made homosexuality legal!”

His roommate says, “Yeah, I know. I’m getting the hell out of here too before the damn fools make it compulsory.




10. Another one is about a gay’s sperms.


Ask : What did one gay sperm say to the other?

Answer : I can’t find my way through all this shi_t.



11. Don’t discriminate homosexuals. All we have to do is to bring them back to the right track.



PEACE

User avatar
MissLT
Ethereal Member
Posts: 3925
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
Status: Other

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by MissLT » Sat Jan 05, 2008 6:29 pm

[quote="bambang"]

11. Don’t discriminate homosexuals. All we have to do is to bring them back to the right track.



PEACE[/quote]
Just because they're different than you, they're not on the "right track"?

User avatar
Bambang
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1930
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 3:26 am
Location: Jakarta Indonesia

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Bambang » Sun Jan 06, 2008 5:25 am

[quote="LennyeTran"][quote="bambang"]

11. Don’t discriminate homosexuals. All we have to do is to bring them back to the right track.



PEACE[/quote]
Just because they're different than you, they're not on the "right track"?[/quote]

They're not different from us. They're just walking on the wrong track.

User avatar
MissLT
Ethereal Member
Posts: 3925
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
Status: Other

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by MissLT » Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:07 am

If you don't think they're different than you, then how can they be walking on the wrong track? Whatever "track" they're walking on should be accepted by you since they're not different from you. How can you say they're walking on the wrong track, for they're not walking on your track yet you don't think they're different? This concept is just wrong on many levels.

User avatar
mr_Love
Platinum Member
Posts: 729
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 10:43 am

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by mr_Love » Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:41 am

" eeewwwwww........"

User avatar
Bambang
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1930
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 3:26 am
Location: Jakarta Indonesia

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Bambang » Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:18 pm

A joke for Rasheed.


Ask : How do you make a gay baby cry?

Answer : Take the pacifier out of his ... a s s.



A joke for Lenny.


Ask : What's the definition of AIDS?

Answer : Anally Injected Death Sentence.




And a joke for me.

A man walks into a bar ... once inside, he realizes it's a gay bar, but he decides, "What the heck, I really want a drink."

So he sits down at the bar, and the gay bartender says to him, "What's the name of your penis?"

The man says, "Look, I'm not into any of that. All I want is a drink."

The gay bartender says, "I'm sorry, but I can't serve you until you tell me the name of your penis."

So the man looks at the man sitting to his left who is sipping on a beer and asks, "Hey bud, what's the name of your penis?"

The gay proudly exclaims, "FORD, because quality is very important, he then ads, "Have you driven a Ford lately?"

"No", said the man.

Then the man turns to the bartender and exclaims, "The name of my penis is SECRET. Now give me my beer."

The bartender begins to pour the man a beer, but with a puzzled look asks, "Why secret?"

The man says, "because it's strong enough for a man but made for a woman!"



Moral of the joke: a penis is made for women.

User avatar
Dixie
Miss EnglishClub.com 2006
Miss EnglishClub.com 2006
Posts: 6341
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 2:08 pm
Status: English Teacher
Location: Catalunya

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Dixie » Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:25 pm

You guys should be ashamed of yourselves. You know there's a word for this, it's homophobia.

User avatar
MissLT
Ethereal Member
Posts: 3925
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
Status: Other

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by MissLT » Mon Jan 07, 2008 4:53 pm

[quote="Dixie"]You guys should be ashamed of yourselves. You know there's a word for this, it's homophobia.[/quote]
Actually, I pity those who admit they're homophobic, but I'm offended beyond words when they don't admit they are. Those people should not go near me and tell me homosexuals are on the wrong track, ewww, what the heck they're thinking, it's against God's will, blah blah blah, yet they don't have the guts to admit they're prejudiced.

It's sad how most of those homophobic people normally have their prejudice towards race and religions also. They either don't like others because of their skin color or religion or both. If you observe those people, it'll amaze you.

User avatar
Dixie
Miss EnglishClub.com 2006
Miss EnglishClub.com 2006
Posts: 6341
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 2:08 pm
Status: English Teacher
Location: Catalunya

Re:

Post by Dixie » Mon Jan 07, 2008 5:00 pm

[quote="bambang"]
Even animals which have no good brain as human beings never "marry" their same sex. He animals have intercourse with she animals. They never make a single mistake on this. They know exactly that he with she. [i][b][size=150]There is no he with he in their dictionary. [/size][/b][/i] :cry:[/quote]

Where did you get that? As far as I know, animals DO have homosexual behaviours. And, according to Wikipedia:"Homosexual behavior occurs among numerous animals other than humans, particularly among social animals".

And it goes on:

"Homosexual sexual behavior occurs in the animal kingdom, especially in social species, particularly in marine birds and mammals, monkeys, and the great apes. Homosexual behavior has been observed among 1,500 species, and in 500 of those it is well documented.[128] [4]. This discovery constitutes a major argument against those calling into question the biological legitimacy or naturalness of homosexuality, or those regarding it as a meditated social decision. For example, male penguin couples have been documented to mate for life, build nests together, and to use a stone as a surrogate egg in nesting and brooding. In a well-publicized story from 2004, the Central Park Zoo in the United States replaced one male couple's stone with a fertile egg, which the couple then raised as their own offspring.[129]

The genetic basis of animal homosexuality has been studied in the fly Drosophila melanogaster.[130] Here, multiple genes have been identified that can cause homosexual courtship and mating.[79] These genes are thought to control behavior through pheromones as well as altering the structure of the animal's brains.[131][132] These studies have also investigated the influence of environment on the likelihood of flies displaying homosexual behavior.[133][134]

Georgetown University professor Janet Mann has specifically theorized that homosexual behavior, at least in dolphins, is an evolutionary advantage that minimizes intraspecies aggression, especially among males.[135] Studies indicating prenatal homosexuality in certain animal species have had social and political implications surrounding the gay rights debate.[136]"

If you want more: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_animals
and also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_an ... l_behavior

User avatar
Bambang
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1930
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 3:26 am
Location: Jakarta Indonesia

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Bambang » Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:49 am

Lennye, I am not homophobic. Just take pity on them. That's all.

Thanks for the link, Dixie. Hope we're not gonna copy the animals' behaviors. The animal do that "thing" for the sake of their generation continuity. But we, human beings, should do the opposite. To have generations, we must marry to the opposite sex. Marriages between people of the same sex never produce generations.

User avatar
Dixie
Miss EnglishClub.com 2006
Miss EnglishClub.com 2006
Posts: 6341
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 2:08 pm
Status: English Teacher
Location: Catalunya

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Dixie » Tue Jan 08, 2008 12:16 pm

Rasheed wrote:Dixie

I respect your opinion, because I believe that you say the truth (maybe not always).
:shock: What does that mean? What does truth mean to you? How do you know whether I always tell the truth or not? I guess it depends on what you understand by truth (=statements with which you agree).

No I am not going to discuss such a basic thing as homosexuality with you. It's a natural thing, either if you want to believe it or not. I don't want to blame you, but the society you were raised in. Anyway like I said I don't like discussing basic things with somebody that doesn't want to even try to understand. It's a waste of time.

User avatar
MissLT
Ethereal Member
Posts: 3925
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
Status: Other

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by MissLT » Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:00 pm

Dixie wrote:
Rasheed wrote:Dixie

I respect your opinion, because I believe that you say the truth (maybe not always).
:shock: What does that mean? What does truth mean to you? How do you know whether I always tell the truth or not? I guess it depends on what you understand by truth (=statements with which you agree).
:lol: I'm the "poisonous" one, Dixie. Anyone who stands next to me is a saint, so you'd be like God if you were standing next to me. Ain't that the truth? :mrgreen: :mrgreen: Anyway, we see what we wanted to see, and it's the truth to us, isn't that right?

User avatar
MissLT
Ethereal Member
Posts: 3925
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
Status: Other

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by MissLT » Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:05 pm

bambang wrote:Lennye, I am not homophobic. Just take pity on them. That's all.
I don't understand you. You said you're neither homophobic nor you think they're different, yet you take pity on them and think they're on the wrong track. How can you have all that emotions when you see them as indifferent? They're not criminals, drug dealers, or anything like that. They just choose their mates in a different way than you do. If you think they're not different, how could they live a wrong life? If you're not homophobic, why would you take pity on them? What is the crime that they have done to the humanity? Please enlighten me. :?

User avatar
Dixie
Miss EnglishClub.com 2006
Miss EnglishClub.com 2006
Posts: 6341
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 2:08 pm
Status: English Teacher
Location: Catalunya

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Dixie » Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:14 pm

LennyeTran wrote: we see what we wanted to see, and it's the truth to us, isn't that right?
That's the point!

User avatar
Bambang
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1930
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 3:26 am
Location: Jakarta Indonesia

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Bambang » Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:33 pm

Rasheed wrote: Then this behaviour "Homosexual",
is it a disease or normal situation?
Is it a rule or personal behavior (depend on acceptance of the two persons to do this)?
What's the purpose of marriage?
What's the futuristic results, if this behaviour become common?
We don't need children, right?
We don't need any children. We don't need any generations. Thus, homosexsuality should be supported. Let's gayanize and lesbianize this world so that the population of this world will be decreasing pretty soon. I think this strategy is much more effective than the Chinese government's policy to limit the number of people by imposing a regulation for parents to have only one kid. :lol:
We're all friends, right?

User avatar
Bambang
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1930
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 3:26 am
Location: Jakarta Indonesia

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Bambang » Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:42 pm

LennyeTran wrote: :lol: I'm the "poisonous" one, Dixie. Anyone who stands next to me is a saint, so you'd be like God if you were standing next to me. Ain't that the truth? :mrgreen: :mrgreen: Anyway, we see what we wanted to see, and it's the truth to us, isn't that right?
When I stand next to you, you'll realize that I myself am the real poison. I am far more poisonous than you, my dear. My poison is dead poisonous. :mrgreen:
We're all friends, right?

User avatar
MissLT
Ethereal Member
Posts: 3925
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
Status: Other

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by MissLT » Thu Jan 10, 2008 2:17 am

bambang wrote:
LennyeTran wrote: :lol: I'm the "poisonous" one, Dixie. Anyone who stands next to me is a saint, so you'd be like God if you were standing next to me. Ain't that the truth? :mrgreen: :mrgreen: Anyway, we see what we wanted to see, and it's the truth to us, isn't that right?
When I stand next to you, you'll realize that I myself am the real poison. I am far more poisonous than you, my dear. My poison is dead poisonous. :mrgreen:
I'm sorry. I wasn't really trying to be funny. I was using my "satire" to speak out Rasheed's hypocrisy. He called people liars and don't know what the truth is while he is the one who wants to believe things based on what he sees. Because he sees that I've corrected him, he denies to see the truth in my words. What Dixie said wasn't new, for it was what I said in page 3. Did he see it? Of course, not. I'm glad Dixie didn't wanna discuss it further with him since it'd be a waste of time anyway. This is the reason why people called her smart. :wink:

Hardi
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1219
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 7:44 pm
Status: Other
Location: European Union

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Hardi » Thu Jan 10, 2008 12:43 pm

Until the self reproduction is guaranteed, homosexuals are sure good for society.. They work as well as others.. Only their consumption habits might be different.. so baby-food companies might complain.

User avatar
MissLT
Ethereal Member
Posts: 3925
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
Status: Other

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by MissLT » Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:09 am

Rasheed wrote: If they confirm the homosexual as a normal behavior, so they should be accept the sex relation between the family's members,
:roll: (mumbling... what a load of ~)

:roll: I hope you didn't get this logic from school. Homosexuals don't sleep with their family members. Being a homosexual and choose the same gender mate has nothing to do with incest. Incest gives you retarded kids; homosexuality doesn't. :roll: :roll: :roll:

User avatar
MissLT
Ethereal Member
Posts: 3925
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
Status: Other

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by MissLT » Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:13 am

Rasheed wrote: So they are scared of this discussion.
Of course, we are scared. Did you even read your logic? It's a bunch of whack similar like keep your legs close during sex or you'll be a slut, don't moan; only sluts do, be sexually available for your husband even when he's already had four wives, pray; only infidels don't pray, etc. :roll: :roll:

User avatar
Dixie
Miss EnglishClub.com 2006
Miss EnglishClub.com 2006
Posts: 6341
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 2:08 pm
Status: English Teacher
Location: Catalunya

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Dixie » Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:31 am

Rasheed wrote:
I don't know who refused the truth, that who search for her or who elude of it.
If they confirm the homosexual as a normal behavior, so they should be accept the sex relation between the family's members, Maybe they are, I don't know. then should to confess many illogical things.
So they are scared of this discussion.
It's not a big problem if they use the lie to prove their views.
Some of them use some reports have no scientific bases, they vilified the wikipedia before, but now it's great, and we can trust it and depend on it.
Anyway, the future will uncover the truth, but till this moment they have a half of world's problem, and they are the creators of second half of problems.
It's clear that the sun shined from the east but it'll die in the west.
What a bunch of c***! Have you even attended school? How can you "reason" like that? And what does homosexuality have to do with incest?

EDIT: I just read Lennye's post above. Sorry they sound the same.

Hardi
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1219
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 7:44 pm
Status: Other
Location: European Union

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Hardi » Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:39 am

Technically can't sex between husband and wife, be also called sex between family members? :roll:

User avatar
Bambang
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1930
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 3:26 am
Location: Jakarta Indonesia

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Bambang » Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:27 pm

LennyeTran wrote: ...Incest gives you retarded kids; homosexuality doesn't. :roll: :roll: :roll:
Well then, incest is still better that homosexuality?
I agree as incets gives kids. :lol: :lol: :lol: and the homos will never. :D :D :D
We're all friends, right?

User avatar
Bambang
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1930
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 3:26 am
Location: Jakarta Indonesia

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Bambang » Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:31 pm

LennyeTran wrote: ...It's a bunch of whack similar like keep your legs close during sex or you'll be a slut, ...
Ha ha ha... 100X

I can's stop laughing! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
We're all friends, right?

User avatar
Bambang
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1930
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 3:26 am
Location: Jakarta Indonesia

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Bambang » Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:34 pm

Hardi wrote:Technically can't sex between husband and wife, be also called sex between family members? :roll:
Yes, you are dead right. :mrgreen:
We're all friends, right?

User avatar
MissLT
Ethereal Member
Posts: 3925
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
Status: Other

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by MissLT » Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:41 am

bambang wrote:
LennyeTran wrote: ...Incest gives you retarded kids; homosexuality doesn't. :roll: :roll: :roll:
Well then, incest is still better that homosexuality?
I agree as incets gives kids. :lol: :lol: :lol: and the homos will never. :D :D :D
Adopt if you want kids and can't have one. Some straight people don't want kids. That's why we have a lot of orphans. Those kids have done nothing to deserve the neglect. What's the point of reproduction when one doesn't wanna take care of the result? :roll:

Moody
Silver Member
Posts: 54
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 11:41 am
Contact:

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Moody » Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:37 am

Let’s analyze Gay Union (physical relation).

It consist of two parts
1- Emotional part that is LOVE which alone without physical part doesn’t fall in the category of Gay relation.
2- Physical part ONLY that defines if the relation is Gay or not. OR you can say that if two men are sexually involved ONLY THEN IT IS GAY REALTION.
So basically this relation is based on SEXUAL NATURE only!

Now lets analyze its MAIN ASPECT that is physical sexual relation.

1- From male satisfaction and sensation point, the best and natural a man get is from women. Question : Is it normal and hygienic or SICK behavior to get it by hitting a s.h.i.t hole??
2- And from the point view of person who is allowing the unnatural intercourse through his s.h.i.t hole. Question : Is in love he force the other to hit his s.h.i.t.? Is it normal or extremely unhygienic insane behavior??

Now the last question does love really demand such unhygienic and UNNATURAL behavior??

Are we so lost that don’t know countless other ways of showing our love and compassion like caring, helping and protecting each other rights etc? Rights doesn’t mean s.h.i.t bashing or adopting insane activities. Insanity is a DESEASE and not the normal course or nature of life. BAD HABITS ARE NOT NATURE, YOU ARE ONLY SO AROGANT NOT WILLING TO LEAVE THEM!!!!!!!!!

Stanley
New Member
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 11:18 am
Status: Other

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Stanley » Wed Jan 30, 2008 11:55 am

I don't want to discus the sexual side although it does play an important part.
Friendship is what it is all about. Gay boys are some of the nicest and most helpful you could meet, that is why such a lot of them work in the services industry. Hairdressers, cabin crew, catering, waiters, etc etc.
What is so wrong in having a same sex friend?
What is wrong if they like to cuddle, kiss, and hold hands?
And yes! they should be allowed to make vows to each other.

User avatar
MissLT
Ethereal Member
Posts: 3925
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
Status: Other

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by MissLT » Sat Feb 02, 2008 3:52 am

Moody wrote:Let’s analyze Gay Union (physical relation).

It consist of two parts
1- Emotional part that is LOVE which alone without physical part doesn’t fall in the category of Gay relation.
2- Physical part ONLY that defines if the relation is Gay or not. OR you can say that if two men are sexually involved ONLY THEN IT IS GAY REALTION.
So basically this relation is based on SEXUAL NATURE only!

Now lets analyze its MAIN ASPECT that is physical sexual relation.

1- From male satisfaction and sensation point, the best and natural a man get is from women. Question : Is it normal and hygienic or SICK behavior to get it by hitting a s.h.i.t hole??
2- And from the point view of person who is allowing the unnatural intercourse through his s.h.i.t hole. Question : Is in love he force the other to hit his s.h.i.t.? Is it normal or extremely unhygienic insane behavior??

Now the last question does love really demand such unhygienic and UNNATURAL behavior??

Are we so lost that don’t know countless other ways of showing our love and compassion like caring, helping and protecting each other rights etc? Rights doesn’t mean s.h.i.t bashing or adopting insane activities. Insanity is a DESEASE and not the normal course or nature of life. BAD HABITS ARE NOT NATURE, YOU ARE ONLY SO AROGANT NOT WILLING TO LEAVE THEM!!!!!!!!!
I can assure that you know nothing about sex based on your post. Please don't embarrass yourself by saying that you know something about sex. You wouldn't have made those statements if you knew something about it. I would shut my mouth and learn more about sex if I were you. :roll:

cosmo
New Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 2:38 pm
Status: English Learner

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by cosmo » Mon Feb 04, 2008 3:22 pm

It is matter of individuals' choice! but my worry is what will happend to the boys (e.g.me) who looks for another kind of body? I hope there were girls too who would not like have relation with same sex and that hope keep alive my business

User avatar
Bambang
Rough Diamond Member
Posts: 1930
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 3:26 am
Location: Jakarta Indonesia

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Bambang » Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:14 am

LennyeTran wrote:
Moody wrote:Let’s analyze Gay Union (physical relation).

It consist of two parts
1- Emotional part that is LOVE which alone without physical part doesn’t fall in the category of Gay relation.
2- Physical part ONLY that defines if the relation is Gay or not. OR you can say that if two men are sexually involved ONLY THEN IT IS GAY REALTION.
So basically this relation is based on SEXUAL NATURE only!

Now lets analyze its MAIN ASPECT that is physical sexual relation.

1- From male satisfaction and sensation point, the best and natural a man get is from women. Question : Is it normal and hygienic or SICK behavior to get it by hitting a s.h.i.t hole??
2- And from the point view of person who is allowing the unnatural intercourse through his s.h.i.t hole. Question : Is in love he force the other to hit his s.h.i.t.? Is it normal or extremely unhygienic insane behavior??

Now the last question does love really demand such unhygienic and UNNATURAL behavior??

Are we so lost that don’t know countless other ways of showing our love and compassion like caring, helping and protecting each other rights etc? Rights doesn’t mean s.h.i.t bashing or adopting insane activities. Insanity is a DESEASE and not the normal course or nature of life. BAD HABITS ARE NOT NATURE, YOU ARE ONLY SO AROGANT NOT WILLING TO LEAVE THEM!!!!!!!!!
I can assure that you know nothing about sex based on your post. Please don't embarrass yourself by saying that you know something about sex. You wouldn't have made those statements if you knew something about it. I would shut my mouth and learn more about sex if I were you. :roll:
Lenny is the sex expert. Don't argue with her! :wink:
We're all friends, right?

Moody
Silver Member
Posts: 54
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 11:41 am
Contact:

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by Moody » Tue Feb 05, 2008 8:58 am

L O L

User avatar
MissLT
Ethereal Member
Posts: 3925
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:05 pm
Status: Other

Re: "Marriages" between people of the same sex?

Post by MissLT » Thu Feb 07, 2008 4:33 am

I'm sorry, there's no such thing as a sex expert in my world; I just didn't doze off in my anatomy and physiology class. Human bodies have always been a curiosity for me.

Post Reply