Under another topic I said
It's been foggy for me for a long time actually.
Should I've said
It's been foggy to me for a long time actually.
Now I prefer the second sentence.
Thanks
for me /to me
Moderator: EC
- Tukanja
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 535
- Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 3:47 pm
- Status: Learner of English
- Tukanja
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 535
- Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 3:47 pm
- Status: Learner of English
Re: for me /to me
Ah, now I've seen I forgot to ask the question.
Which sentence is the correct one?
Which sentence is the correct one?
-
- Rising Star
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:43 pm
- Status: Teacher of English
Re: for me /to me
The second one sounds a bit better. However, either one could be correct, depending on what “it” is. Here are some suggestions on how to say it:
Its actually been foggy to me for a long time.
Its actually been foggy for me for a long time.
The view has been foggy for me.
Those ideas are foggy to me.
I hope this helps.
Its actually been foggy to me for a long time.
Its actually been foggy for me for a long time.
The view has been foggy for me.
Those ideas are foggy to me.
I hope this helps.
- Tukanja
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 535
- Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 3:47 pm
- Status: Learner of English
Re: for me /to me
Of course it does. Thank You!
I think I've made a mistake again. I should have said Should have I said instead of Should I've said, should I, in here quoted sentence?Tukanja wrote:Should I've said
It's been foggy to me for a long time actually.Thanks