let (in passive) + bare infinitive

English grammar questions, answered by Alan

Moderator: Alan

Gold Member
Posts: 115
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 10:34 am
Status: English Learner

let (in passive) + bare infinitive

Post by Rustamsher » Sun Apr 14, 2013 5:36 pm

I have come across the following sentence in a dictionary recently:

I was not let see him.

Is this grammatically correct? Or should it be TO SEE after the verb LET
in the passive voice?

User avatar
EC Teacher
EC Teacher
Posts: 12886
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 7:56 pm
Status: English Teacher
Location: Japan

Re: let (in passive) + bare infinitive

Post by Alan » Mon Apr 15, 2013 7:45 am

Unacceptable as contemporary usage, in my view, either with or without 'to'!

--> I was not allowed to see him.

I suggest you purchase a new dictionary!