English grammar questions, answered by Alan

Moderator: Alan

Platinum Member
Posts: 501
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 1:19 pm


Post by navi » Tue Sep 17, 2013 7:32 am

1-That was his first movie with Sidney Poitier.
2-That was his first movie, with Sidney Poitier.

In 1 it is clear that 'his first movie with Sidney Poitier' forms a single noun phrase. (It was not his first movie. It was his first movie with Sidney Poitier.)

Does the comma in 2 make 'with Sidney Poitier' non-restrictive?
Does 2 correspond to"

3-That was his first movie, in which Sidney Poitier had a role.


User avatar
EC Teacher
EC Teacher
Posts: 12886
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 7:56 pm
Status: English Teacher
Location: Japan

Re: restrictive/non-restrictive

Post by Alan » Thu Sep 19, 2013 3:36 am

Essentially yes (to both questions), with the caveat that sentence 2 is stylistically poor to the point of being structurally dubious. It really ought to read 'first movie, which was with...'.