Hi all,
Could you please suggest whether the sentence highlighted in bold (from E. H. Gombrich's A Little History of the World) is grammatically correct?
“[During the Stone Age,] [s]now lay deep throughout the year, not only on mountain tops, but down in the valleys as well, and glaciers, which were immense in those days, spread far out into the plains. This is why we say that the Stone Age began before the last Ice Age had ended.”
Shouldn't it be "the Stone Age HAD BEGAN before the last Ice Age ENDED" — instead of "the Stone Age BEGAN before the last Ice Age HAD ENDED", given that 'had' must be used with a verb that indicates that something takes place prior to something else, in this case 'something else' being the end of the last Ice Age?
Kind regards and thanks a lot for your help!
The use of past perfect tense in the following sentence
Moderator: EC
-
- Member
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2019 6:05 pm
- Status: Learner of English
- Joe
- Admin/Teacher
- Posts: 1789
- Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2003 6:56 am
- Status: Teacher of English
- Location: England
Re: The use of past perfect tense in the following sentence
E. H. Gombrich writes correctly.
https://www.englishclub.com/grammar/ver ... erfect.htm
Note that if you use begin in past perfect it should be "had begun", not "had began".
https://www.englishclub.com/grammar/ver ... erfect.htm
Note that if you use begin in past perfect it should be "had begun", not "had began".
"We are not wholly bad or good, who live our lives under Milk Wood :-| " — Dylan Thomas, Under Milk Wood
eBooks: English Prepositions List | Essential Business Words | Learn English in Seven
eBooks: English Prepositions List | Essential Business Words | Learn English in Seven
-
- Member
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2019 6:05 pm
- Status: Learner of English
Re: The use of past perfect tense in the following sentence
Dear Joe,
Many thanks for your reply. I, however, still don't see how it is correct, given that Gombrich uses past perfect vis-a-vis something that happened AFTER another event in the past, and not before it. But if it is indeed correct, can I kindly ask you to explain how?
Regarding "had began", yes, of course, that was a typo.
Kind regards,
Ivan
Many thanks for your reply. I, however, still don't see how it is correct, given that Gombrich uses past perfect vis-a-vis something that happened AFTER another event in the past, and not before it. But if it is indeed correct, can I kindly ask you to explain how?
Regarding "had began", yes, of course, that was a typo.
Kind regards,
Ivan