bones of dogs

Members help members on grammar, vocab, pronunciation...

Moderator: EC

Post Reply
azz
Top
Top
Posts: 299
Joined: February 6th, 2004, 12:50 pm

bones of dogs

Post by azz »

a. Buried in the cave there were the bones of dogs.

b. Buried in the cave there were bones of dogs.


What is the difference between the meanings of these sentences?

Many thanks
User avatar
Josef Essberger
Admin/Teacher
Admin/Teacher
Posts: 1936
Joined: December 18th, 2003, 6:56 am

Re: bones of dogs

Post by Josef Essberger »

azz wrote: January 14th, 2021, 8:30 am a. Buried in the cave there were the bones of dogs.

b. Buried in the cave there were bones of dogs.


What is the difference between the meanings of these sentences?

Many thanks
Frankly, in this case there seems to be little or no difference. The first is a touch more formal.

On the other hand, if it read:

- Buried in the cave there were the bones of the dogs.

then it would refer to certain specific dogs that we have already been discussing - and their bones.
English Prepositions List by Josef Essberger
Extremely useful ebook full of examples and visual aids to learn prepositions :ok: Inés Barbero
User avatar
mdogsw
New
New
Posts: 1
Joined: May 21st, 2024, 9:51 am

Re: bones of dogs

Post by mdogsw »

I love dogs
Post Reply