2nd conditional tense semantics :D

Active teacher (and student) topics are at ESL Forums

Moderator: Joe

TutorT
Prolific Member
Prolific Member
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 11:22 am

2nd conditional tense semantics :D

Unread post by TutorT »

Hey Everybody,
Is it grammatically ok to say -
1. If I told you that "I love you", would you say that you are mine?
If so must I have the quotation marks around " I love you"?
or must I lose the "that"-
2. If I told you " I love you", would you say that you are mine?
And if using "that" -
3. If I told you that I loved you, would you say that you are mine.
For me all 3 are fine but my natural way to say it is 1 but I feel this is the most questionable grammatically given the mixed tense.
I'm interested to hear what you think... ; )
ta
Grainger
User avatar
Joe
Admin
Admin
Posts: 61
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 5:38 pm
Status: Teacher

Re: 2nd conditional tense semantics :D

Unread post by Joe »

tell someone that something
say to someone "something"

Hope this answers part of your question. :D
TutorT
Prolific Member
Prolific Member
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 11:22 am

Re: 2nd conditional tense semantics :D

Unread post by TutorT »

yes thanks, I guess I was using the quotes with "that" to justify using love in the present tense. Maybe the only truly correct way to express the meaning I want is to change'told' to 'said' - If I said "I love you" would you say that you are mine.
Because these are lyrics to a song the original "if I told you that I love you, would you say that you are mine", I think, sounds better poetically.
To me using loved allows for the interpretation that the love is not current but in the past sometime, so the line doesn't make sense - if I said I loved you sometime in the past, why would you say you are mine now? :D
tis a tangled web I weave :D
User avatar
Joe
Admin
Admin
Posts: 61
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 5:38 pm
Status: Teacher

Re: 2nd conditional tense semantics :D

Unread post by Joe »

Tangled web indeed :)

Perhaps the confusion arises because English tenses don't necessarily correlate to time:

"If I won a million euro" (past tense) refers to the future. ;-)

Why try to reinvent the wheel?
- If I said that I loved you would you say that you were mine? (both actions in present)
- If I had said that I loved you would you have said that you were mine? (both actions in past)
TutorT
Prolific Member
Prolific Member
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 11:22 am

Re: 2nd conditional tense semantics :D

Unread post by TutorT »

YES! Thank you for that supreme effort, that's it. That sounds much more natural to me. I's was gettin' me ares and me weres mixed up :D
User avatar
natedigby
Member
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 3:10 am
Status: Other

Re: 2nd conditional tense semantics :D

Unread post by natedigby »

EC wrote:Tangled web indeed :)

Perhaps the confusion arises because English tenses don't necessarily correlate to time:

"If I won a million euro" (past tense) refers to the future. ;-)

Why try to reinvent the wheel?
- If I said that I loved you would you say that you were mine? (both actions in present)
- If I had said that I loved you would you have said that you were mine? (both actions in past)

This was the perfect answer for the topic. Very clear and very precise.

Thanks!

Nate
TutorT
Prolific Member
Prolific Member
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 11:22 am

Re: 2nd conditional tense semantics :D

Unread post by TutorT »

Hey I finished the 2nd conditional song. Thank you for your help :)
If you're interested you can see a sample here - http://tutortunes.net/tutortunes/2010/0 ... nditional/
Post Reply