I have a student that wants me to explain the difference between:
could have been -and- could have become
The example he gave me:
" He could have been someone great, if he had only worked harder at his goals"
"He could have become someone great, if he had only worked harder at his goals"
Is there a difference? How would I explain this to the student? Is there a rule?
Thanks
could have been vs. could have become
Moderator: Joe
- preissmurphy
- Member
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2015 7:50 am
- Status: Other
- cerealkillah
- Prolific Member
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 10:28 am
- Status: Teacher
Re: could have been vs. could have become
In my opinion there is no significant difference, apart from the one between "be" and "become". However, in this case (unreal past, or hypothetical event in the past) it doesn't matter if we refer to a certain point in time (become) or some broader time (be). What matters is that "he isn't anyone great today".
Re: could have been vs. could have become
I agree with cerealkillah
Take a look at Lucy Pollard's Guide to Teaching English