shokin wrote: I a for the diversity, for the small countries and towns. Not for the madness of bigness.
Shokin
Well, this is a communist ideal to me, my dear. However, classification and ranking are one of our things. If we didn't classify one another, how would we know what something should be? And if we didn't rank one another, how would we know who or which would be better or richer?
shokin wrote: Communism did not work because it was imposed.
To me communism never works. In my view, a country that is following communist system will end up being a capitalist country at some point.
shokin wrote:Where is the necessity to play the conquistador ? only money (benefits and sales) by delocalizations ?
I am not for killing (socially, biologically or psychologically) the human being like me.
Let us have a global vision. Let us see nature and what we do with... heu... let us stop playing too much with nature.
Shokin
Are you living on a tree? Just kidding. Well yeah, this is a nice thought, but don't you think either it's a poor or rich country, at some point, each will help one another out???
I think Somalians will dominate the world. They are already everywhere. They even dominate the taxi-cab driving business! They can take anyone anywhere. Yes, they are the certainly the ones to watch out for in this topsy turvy world.
danyet wrote:I think Somalians will dominate the world. They are already everywhere. They even dominate the taxi-cab driving business! They can take anyone anywhere. Yes, they are the certainly the ones to watch out for in this topsy turvy world.
Were you peeping outside the windows when I and my cousins were having a joke about this? You're not supposed to do that, you know.
